Thanks for the further explanation. I had my concerns about querying your initial post in that you might inadvertently undermine my faith and positive regard for stoicism with any further replies. But I'm glad that has not been the case.
I understand where you are coming from now, although I can't say that I've witnessed any of the types who make stoicism their entire personality.
It does sound a bit much, to say the least. I see it as something worth learning more about, as it's one of the most practical approaches to kind of 'going with the flow' and being at peace with it, that I have encountered so far. In some ways it doesn't exactly seem like a philosophy, although it has many central concepts , but much more of a practical and grounded approach and mindset to adopt (at least when it suits) to life.
I fully admit to having nothing but the vaguest knowledge of other philosophies. From my limited knowledge of other philosophies, many of them seem so much more abstract, (which tends to turn me off straight away) and would require a hell of a lot of studying and digestion, in order to be able to apply the teachings. But perhaps Budhism is similar to Stoicism in some ways, in what I gather is another kind of kind of 'acceptance of what is' based philosophy and religion. Also similar to the Muslim belief systems in that regard, that seem to surrender fate and destiny to the will of Alah, and the conviction that everything that happens is the will of Alah, and is therefor good and right and proper, and not to be worried about. Not sure I agree with that, but that's going off on a bit of a tangent.
I can't say I've ever seen any example of people making their entire personality based on Stoicism. Maybe I should just search for 'extreme stoic living' etc to find such examples. Otherwise, I guess the original Stoic thinkers could have been regarded in the same light. Marcus Aurelius's 'Meditations' were never intended for publication, they were his private journals, of his own thoughts and practices. But they seem to have ended up being one of the central tenets of the whole philosophy.
The type of people I mean tend to be Bros. Usually tech bros, almost exclusively alpha male bros, wake up and grind bros…
In all cases they miss the entire point of stoicism which is far closer to (as you point out) “go with the flow,” “it is what it is,” “acceptance over desire” school of thought than the “more tough = more good” bastardisation of stoicism the aforementioned folk always seem to go by.
I’d strongly recommend branching out into other philosophy though. I’ve posted several accessible philosophy channels in this thread previously and they’re all worth trying to see what fits imo. I would suggest Nietzsche is perhaps closest to stoicism in more modern philosophy, but he’s obviously massively controversial due to certain groups taking totally the wrong lessons
Aurelius was actually very lenient and forgiving by stoic standards. They got pretty hardcore in previous centuries. As did the cynics which inspired them. All of which is briefly explained in this here video - along with stoic stew

