I need to start having children.
Definitely not a request, fate
really don't know what to do with these damn chemicals iv got coming just really regret buying them now not looking forward to it stupid £60 just chucked away fucking idiot
really don't know what to do with these damn chemicals iv got coming just really regret buying them now not looking forward to it stupid £60 just chucked away fucking idiot
yeah i do mate its the same guilt i always get just got the usual mpa and 3fmp and 3 g of noids plus i forgot the is 5 of them new etzi coming as well
just disgusted with my lack of self control and ive let some one down when i promised him i would do it again
You could always not open the package and write return to sender on the envelope
Ugh they're all wanting to build more houses I'm ashamed of this country.
Evey
Ugh they're all wanting to build more houses I'm ashamed of this country.
If you are referring to the e-liquid you mention in a recent prior post... at the risk of raising a sore yet obvious point... how is it any different from all the other chemicals with unknown longterm effects - some known already to be almost certainly highly iffy to say the least? As far as I can see the only real difference is that you are taking the Heil's word for it with the less "exciting" ones and saying "fuck it" with the ones you enjoy even in the full and certain knowledge they can be harmful.
I'm guessing this is another tabloid e-cig formaldehyde story you are referring to? If so then it's worth noting that formaldehyde is one of several thousand "poisonous" (aka "more undeniably toxic due to decades of evidence) chemicals present in tobacco smoke. You don't even know what chemicals are present in half the shit you've smoked over the years - and nor do any of the rest of us including myself - so it seems kinda strange to suddenly be taking such strong umbrage to a random tabloid story you'd pay no attention to - or outright deny - if about one of your more favoured substances. And quite possibly rightly so cos I'd be pretty sure the "science" is equally as good in both cases.
I'd suggest you don't read all you beliieve in the papers and don't go with the "just so long as it fills the hole and/or feels good" approach to deciding what is and is not likely to be harmful.
Having said that we all do and I'm more guiilty than most on that score so have no place to be lecturing and is not my intent with this post. Just pointing out internal consistency issues is all. Is something I'm trying to work on myself so absolutely will appreciate anybody doing the same for me.
EDIT: In the light of the above I'm gonna assume you were meaning the RC stuff you posted some time earlier is what you were meaning so feel free to ignore the above.
Don't be too hard on ya self mate. It aint helpin anything. Just try to cope with it. Whats done is done, if u can flush BIG UP but if u can't thats allso OK. we have (or most of us) been there![]()
Photosynthesis n killing our beautiful, natual surroundings. There'll be no worry about homelessness in a few years. We'll all be dead!
Evey