• 🇬🇧󠁿 🇸🇪 🇿🇦 🇮🇪 🇬🇭 🇩🇪 🇪🇺
    European & African
    Drug Discussion


    Welcome Guest!
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
  • EADD Moderators: Pissed_and_messed | Shinji Ikari

Gibberings CLXXIV - Cock Piss Partridge

Status
Not open for further replies.
I didn't say you needed to be an expert. I merely suggested that if someone is going to have a definitive opinion on a scientific matter it should probably be based on some grounding in fact, rather than being picked out of thin air. Otherwise it's just pubtalk really.

Right. Look where we're having this discussion. In a thread titled 'Gibberings CLXXIV - Cock Piss Partridge'. I thought the "it's just pubtalk really" was a given.

Has this touched some sort of nerve? I've never seen you react this way to a discussion before.
 
Probably because I said I have one. Yes there's no definitive proof either way - I'm with Owen on that one - but, in my opinion, I feel that I have one because since I was 3, I've never had interests I've had "obsessions," n I tend to fixate on one thing or I feel complete emptiness, like an endless void. I feel it's a curse.

But nonetheless , thinking of The Four Agreement "Dont take it Personally," so I won't.

As I said to SHM - let's agree to disagree?

Edit: i love Google scholar but you need a uni for any more than the abstract.

Evey
 
Right. Look where we're having this discussion. In a thread titled 'Gibberings CLXXIV - Cock Piss Partridge'. I thought the "it's just pubtalk really" was a given.

Has this touched some sort of nerve? I've never seen you react this way to a discussion before.

Yeah it has touched a nerve, I find it really irritating when people present their own opinion as fact, irrespective of what it may be.

Frankly on the one hand I find it amusing that people are getting so defensive behind their own beliefs on this particular subject because there really is little to no evidence pointing in either direction (if anything it points away from your position but I don't know enough to actually make a statement). On the other hand, it's kind of sad because this is supposed to be a hub of useful information and discussion and well.......
 
I remember a time when I enjoyed reading this forum, I think it was around september 2013 when things changed

That is when MDB got off the phenazepam makes me remember Cornish again and that I miss reading his posts
 
I remember a time when I enjoyed reading this forum, I think it was around september 2013 when things changed

When September 2013? Sorry to hear you don't enjoy it no more. I've actually started to like it here again now. And this Gibz has nearly ran out so it's filling up again with people n some interesting debates.

Plus we've some new mids now ( not that there was anything wrong before as i loved them) just nice to have chatative n allein as mods, don't you think?

Evey
 
Yeah it has touched a nerve, I find it really irritating when people present their own opinion as fact, irrespective of what it may be.

Frankly on the one hand I find it amusing that people are getting so defensive behind their own beliefs on this particular subject because there really is little to no evidence pointing in either direction (if anything it points away from your position but I don't know enough to actually make a statement). On the other hand, it's kind of sad because this is supposed to be a hub of useful information and discussion and well.......

In other words "I have an addictive personality and it's fucking me off that people are claiming it's not real".

this is supposed to be a hub of useful information and discussion and well.......

Where was that attitude when these threads were created? (& this is the Gibberings, ie talking shite, thread)

Post a Funny GIF
Girl sucks 24 cocks for a free drink in Magaluf
Saying Stupid Things on MMA
Football, acid, wanking


Fair enough if it's a touchy subject man, but don't dress it up as "This place is supposed to be better than this".
 
Ah, but the thing is, we live in a culture where doing almost anything for the enjoyment of it is frowned upon, yet it's legitimate to do certain things if you have something wrong with you. Therefore, we rationalise and legitimise our decisions by painting them as the consequences of illness. When actually, the only thing wrong with most people is that they think they have something wrong with themselves.

Do people really ease the guilt of a night at the pub by saying - oh, it's fine: it's my Generalised Anxiety Disorder? Doubt it.

When applied to rationalising drug use through 'self-medication' of self-diagnosed 'illnesses', then yes, I agree.
 
Right. Look were[spelling?] we're[who?] having this discussion. In a thread titled 'Gibberings CLXXIV - Cock Piss Partridge' [citation needed]. I thought the "it's just pubtalk really" was a given. [examples needed] [neutrality is disputed]

This post contains wording that promotes the subject in a subjective manner without imparting real information. Please remove or replace such wording and instead of making proclamations about a subject's importance, use facts and attribution to demonstrate that importance.
 
Last edited:
In other words "I have an addictive personality and it's fucking me off that people are claiming it's not real".



Where was that attitude when these threads were created? (& this is the Gibberings, ie talking shite, thread)

Post a Funny GIF
Girl sucks 24 cocks for a free drink in Magaluf
Saying Stupid Things on MMA
Football, acid, wanking


Fair enough if it's a touchy subject man, but don't dress it up as "This place is supposed to be better than this".

It's really not a touchy subject, addiction is one subject I've spent enough of my life discussing to not be offended by any particular opinion, I'm unlikely to hear anything I haven't heard before (and actually, that's the stuff that I would really like to hear). Like I said, I don't fall down on either side of the fence in this discussion, I don't think there's enough evidence in either direction to claim either the existence of or lack of an 'addictive personality'.

If I say something like 'peer-reviewed academic research', it's because I'm interested in accessing the information that presumably someone espousing a particular opinion must have to be espousing said opinion if it's not a clear cut subject. I'm always interested in learning more on certain subjects especially if it's something that is either a definitive statement on something where I have a differing opinion or no opinion as of yet. For instance, a study showing a clear link would between OCD and addiction would be an interesting thing to read because as far as I'm aware they have nothing to do with each other.

As for the threads......well it's not me that decided to turn this into a social forum.

Why the need to be so defensive just because someone has challenged you on your belief?
 
Research into the DRD2 and ANKK1 gene

But even the scientists researching here say addiction is to do with environment

"Genes are certainly not sufficient to produce disease by themselves. The individual must be exposed to alcohol, which, in common with any chemical encountered in the world, is explicitly environmental "
 
I'm not being defensive at all. I wouldn't even say I was "challenged on a belief". I hit out with a half formed opinion in the middle of making my breakfast. I don't have any solid "beliefs" on this particular subject.

Just seems a bit weird how you've went off on one over this particular subject, when you're usually totally fine with people's bullshit opinions. That's all.

Phil Mitchell though...
 
Bhd31MjIIAAHwIU.jpg:small
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top