GeorgeJung
Ex-Bluelighter
- Joined
- May 19, 2006
- Messages
- 225
LiquidMethod said:All 3 of the movies needed Gambit. Not sure why he wasn't included, but yea, that's wack.
they couldn't afford someone pimp enough to play him
LiquidMethod said:All 3 of the movies needed Gambit. Not sure why he wasn't included, but yea, that's wack.
L2R said:XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX SLIGHT SPOILER XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
This was not a good scene. It completely compromised Xavier's leadership, wisdom and patience. Saying something arrogant like "i don't need to explain myself to you." is a total cop out, and cannot be uttered by anyone but really flawed characters.
Patrick Stewart has played an equally strong character in a similar situation where he was forced to break down in another movie fanchise, but that was done without comprimising the character's strength. See Star Trek: First Contact, for the scene where his command decision is challenged by the "girl from the past".
.
if you're going to criticize someone's syntax/spelling use propper grammer. "trustworthy"? you meant to say "trusting"i would take your critique on board, but am highly untrustworthy of someone who spells "two" as "too"
DigitalDuality said:lol funnily enough... i drew that exact same conclusion...the girl from the past was named Lily by the way.![]()
Psychedelic Gleam said:horrid horrid movie when compared to the first too...
Brett Radner took an interesting and exciting comic book series (and first too movies) and turned it into trite drama, boring and melodramatic with typical hollywood big explositions and such...
Hugely disappointed.
Agreed. I was really annoyed at this also.This was not a good scene. It completely compromised Xavier's leadership, wisdom and patience. Saying something arrogant like "i don't need to explain myself to you." is a total cop out, and cannot be uttered by anyone but really flawed characters.
What an elegant metaphor! Absolutely fitting too. I love it.Film is like poetry - it has to convey huge concepts with relatively little time and material...
L2R said:i was wrong: chick
![]()
albeit a very manly faced chick.