Medicine should not be kept from kids just because it makes them feel better, that's absolutely absurd.
Good on the Mother.
Good on the Mother.
GlassGurl;11082901 said:As a mother I would way rather have my child taking something natural for pain, rather than an opiate.
Yeah. The dude is an idiot, if leukemia is not considered a terminal disease, then I don't know what is.Ho-Chi-Minh;11083762 said:I feel like that dad may be just trying to get back at the mother
ro4eva;11115649 said:I think you probably meant to say 'opioid' rather than 'opiate' as opiates normally refer to the alkaloids found in the opium poppy plant/flower, such as morphine and codeine which are in fact natural and have been cultivated/used for thousands of years (documented use by the ancient Egyptians).
-----------------------------
Re. the article - I don't think any parent wants to see their child being fed psychotropic drugs, regardless of the controversy surrounding this case. I just, like others, believe that this made headlines because the drug in question is one which has been vilified by exaggerated and/or false propaganda since the early 30s and more so by the Nixon war on drugs.
To put things into perspective - for every child in the U.S. being given THC therapeutically, I'm guessing there must be untold thousands being fed Ritalin for ADHD/ADD. As some of you know, methylphenidate (the active ingredient in Ritalin), a potent stimulant which apparently works in the brain the same way as cocaine, can have some rather serious side effects when being given to a child, such as:
- stunted growth
- abnormal heartbeat (possibly leading to heart failure and death)
- hypertension
- abnormal loss of hair
- psychosis (or other psychiatric disorders such as depression)
- suicidal thoughts
Also, there have been several reports of sudden death in children who were given Ritalin.
Even so, I don't recall ever reading an article in the newspaper (or viewing anything on TV) regarding the aforementioned possible dangers of said drug. I've literally had to google 'ritalin deaths' before I was finally able to find any information.
It is indeed a sad and somewhat pathetic state many of us are living in when these corporate drug dealers - sorry, I meant pharmaceutical companies - seem to be able to somehow, literally gag the marjority of the media, public and government from panicking after, for example, a child suddenly dies from Ritalin use - in stark contrast to the way we seem to freak out every time it so happens that the drug in question is a controversial one.
Crankinit;11082893 said:If someone has cancer and is undergoing chemo, I'd say a little marijuana is the least of their worries.
S'wayne;11140890 said:I'm sorry but everyone seems so bloody biased I have to wonder if anyone truly read the article? And I mean like without formulating preconceived notions that prevented almost all of you folks from noticing key pieces of information in the article?
The father has some very valid concerns. Whether her condition is fatal or dire is not certain, we don't have access to her medical information just the words of her parents, including information that she is receiving chemotherapy. One thing that is certain is that her father seems confident that she is not on death's door, which he mentions.....he also implies this when he expressed concern over his child's brain development, not something that would matter if she was ready to go any day now. And as we all know it is a legitimate concern that pot use before the brain is done developing can potentially cause issues further on down the road.
So the little girl is receiving chemotherapy, perhaps her father is right. If he noticed the medicine has the girl blasted out of her mind, that probably isn't good, especially if she isn't in severe pain. after all, not every 8 year old kid on chemo gets weed, and chances are there are a degrees of suffering amongst kids warranting it more than in her case. So yeah if it isn't truly necessary, and is affecting this little girl maybe it is an issue. Maybe the little girl doesn't mind being blasted out of her mind all the time...does that make it ok? Maybe the dad just wants her to be playing with friends and living as much of a normal little girl life as possible. Maybe he wouldn't be making an issue of it if it wasn't so excessive and was used sparingly, such as before/after treatments....not every day.....will the father have a valid point when she is in remission and still wants to get high, or starts smoking weed heavy at the age of 12?