• Philosophy and Spirituality
    Welcome Guest
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
    Threads of Note Socialize
  • P&S Moderators: JackARoe | Cheshire_Kat

Einstien on Religion

To all those that felt my comments against Einstein were negative read a few of his writting, and books. His theories were close, yes. It's not totally correct, and he himself admited to it. He made the first step to eliminate the ether based theories, and go onto work with Heisenberg on the Quantum Mechanics problems.

However, not to be mistaken as pure arrogance on my part, I doubt many of you could even begin to understand some of his work. Soon, you guys will be reading some of my papers, here first. I need to have more time to finish them :p. I hope you boys, and girls can keep up though. =D

Don't take this personally please. I get hit on by ladies every day, but I have absolutely no idea where to take it. I try to be myself, but I'm generally a very cold, and indifferent person. People seem offended by this, when they finally realized that what I show them ,truelly, is how I am. Confident, yes. Intelligent, I'm not fully sure on that one (the debate is still open). Shy, I'm positive of this.
I wish I had the social skills at times to speak to these ladies, but I must keep working, for my path is chosen by genetic shift, and simple timing of events that forced me to take this direction.

I would gladly have stayed in the millitary for the next 20 years, but I didn't go along with the new re-structuring of the millitary into this total!tar!an, empire building machine it is turning into. :p
 
^^^^^^^^^^^^ Look up one please.

Leg said:
i agree with the original poster's post (or einstein's views, if that's really what they are ;))

and...einstein was a genius...the theory of relativity is a hella smart theory, i will say that much...i studied it last semester

it just says "everything is relative" in physics/math terms

and there has been some proof done
the bending of light from distant suns in the gravitational field of the earth was verified
as einstein predicted

the difference in wristwatch time of a guy on earth and a guy launched into orbit was also shown as predicted, i think

man...i'm stoned, too :) cheers
Click to expand...


Everything is relative to the "rate of it's acceleration". That's something everybody seems to either leave out, or forget. :\

Light bending wasn't fully Einstein. That was also Heisenberg.

Einstein wasn't write on everything, though. His static universe, wasn't even close. Inflation was wrong, and he thesis on dark matter is still open. Some people say there's proof, but it's merely a coincidence, until someone else finds the same results.

I can't remember the watch thing, but I know it was in the seventies that is was worked out. I need to read up, or that acid fried me...:p


The thing on the scientists being all Jewish is for the most part true. The Jewish community was the first to denounce the exsistence of a supreme being.
 
Last edited:
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ LooK up two first please.

kittyinthedark said:
Just a little addendum: the US is currently doing an experiment trying to completely prove the theory of relativity. Most aspects of it have been proven, but this one little part hasn't been proven yet. This experiment has been in the works for fifty years, but due to lots of stupid complications it wasn't carried out til now. If it goes as planned, it will conclusively demonstrate that the theory of relativity is correct.

The gist of the experiment is this: they launched a satellite up that has inside of it five perfectly spherical quartz balls (well, DAMN close to perfect, they are the closest to perfectly spherical objects that have EVER been created on earth) Now that the satellite is in space, a mechanism has made the balls start spinning on an axis, much like the earth does. Delicate equipment inside the machine is measuring the distortment occuring in the spinning and position of the spheres, with the intent of showing the effects of a space-time warp. For more details just look up "einstein," "crystal," "satellite," and "relativity." There are quite a few articles about this experiment out there.
Click to expand...


Few people are aware that this is also the base testing of the guidance system for the new "$tar War$" project. The main obstacle is guiding a laser, or missile accurately enough to hit a moving target the size of a Civic Hatchback. How else to do this other , than rebuilding the GP$ network, and using a guidance system that takes in account the effects of gravitational shift. The GP$ network got a major rework, just last fall. The next gen receiver/transmiters are out. Why don't they sell just plain receivers like they used to sell?

BTW the aspect of the theory this going to prove, has already being proven with lasers in a lab about 15 years ago, and with a guy, and a watch in the $R-71. This was just another ploy to get people to open, and perceptive to positive aspects of this launch. Mind you, a launch paid for by the US state department. Where did that 87 billion+ go again? I think it was up to 275 billion at last look, and they just asked fo another 20 billion. :p :p

I hate myself at times, I think too much.
 
How did they prove the dragging of space-time with a guy and a watch?
 
"I can't remember the watch thing, but I know it was in the seventies that is was worked out."

That's because you're thinking of Hawking Radiation. Einstein was dead for 20 years before Hawking and Penrose starting thinging about equalizing emissions of "dark matter" from intense gravitational fields.
 
I'm sure countless people have denounced the existance of a supreme god. I don't think jewish people as a community ever did that though.
 
The Jewish community would no longer exist if they denounced belief in YHWH.. the whole basis on which they have lived their lives for 5000 years would be null and void.
 
Is it just me, or does this seem to be the case in many threads... Every time I try to get involved in a conversation, it winds up being a policing activity. The worst offenders are those who believe they have some alternative theory to some reasonably well observed theory... relativity for instance...

Anyway - let's take a quick poll (if you all would be nice enough to participate) about the overall ratio of fact to fiction on this board... Give it up, 50-50 style.

/wondering if this'll get anything(?)
 
Really depends on the subject at hand. People on average know about certain things more than others. That's the whole point of having a forum, bring our knowledge and opinions together to build a more concrete picture of whatever it is that is being discussed.
 
The Jewish community has more people in it that are mainly atheist than you'd think. Especially in Israel itself. I've had this convo with a few Rabbi's myself. Our company deals with people in Israel quite a bit.



Cpt. Pink Pants. I could post page after page proving to you how wrong "General Relativity" can be. "Ideal Relativity" is accurate if you take into the context it was deseigned to be used for. Relativity is only used on a case by case basis, and if you really read my posts, you'd see that the main reason that satellite was launched wasn't for research.

Here's what I was talking about BTW -
Einstein's Special Theory of Relativity predicted that time does not flow at a fixed rate: moving clocks appear to tick more slowly relative to their stationary counterparts. But this effect only becomes really significant at very high velocities that app roach the speed of light.
When "generalized" to include gravitation, the equations of relativity predict that gravity, or the curvature of spacetime by matter, not only stretches or shrinks distances (depending on their direction with respect to the gravitational field) but also will appear to slow down or "dilate" the flow of time
Click to expand...

The watch in the satellite, and the one used in the SR-71 proved this already.


Light bending was research done with Heisenberg working on the "Probabilities" theories. Of course this could be attributed to the wave like effect light appears to present.

How in hell did you assume I was thinking of Hawking Radiation? I wouldn't even consider that, as being close to this topic. "Dark Matter" another unproven theory.:p Don't get me started on this sloppy math.
 
Last edited:
Examples of? I'll assume of proving GR incorrect... I will when I get time to post my work. Sorry to hold carrots like that, but it's not done. :\
 
I think I have to partially agree with highlife on this one. Einstein was a genius, but people do get extremely carried away with even something as simple as just his name.

Yes, he was a very smart man. Yes, he deserves credit for his work. Do we need to idolize him and take his word as 100% absolute truth on everything just because he came up with some good theories? Fuck no... but yet, I see people doing it all the time.... I've seen people here use him to back up their positions, by saying shit along the lines of.. ohhh well einstien agreed with me and thought this too... so it must be right!!!!! pfftt...lol...

Anyway, my point is basically this... He deserves credit for his math, but he is not an omni-scient being and I'm sure if he was here today and he saw some of the shit people say about him, he would put them in their place and explain to them that his opinion on a particular topic, something such as religion, is no more right or wrong then anybody elses. Opinion is opinion... Thats the end of it...
 
He was a genius when it came to classical physics, but he wouldn't accept the data and implications of quantum physics and thought it was an error.
 
Last edited:
^^^ Very true, and the simple fact he failed his college entrance exam just furthers the fact, that he was brilliant, yet still an idiot.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top