Does believing in Evolution say a lot about you

[rickolasnice]

You've been cheeky throughout
I dont think you are serious, just looking for laugh. But joke is you're getting clowned.

See?

Convergent evolution?
How about you a dress that first, and I may take your questions seriously

.

What about convergent evolution? I did address it. I'm just not sure what you are getting at.

On cambrian explosion,
Yes forever after,

What?.

He doesn't see evidence doesn't really help him and actually hurts theory.
Dont know if he seriously doesn't see this or is just pretending

It helps the theory of evolution in the way that there are transitional fossils within it, and that it is a collection of fossils we know are from a certain, datable time, and that the fossils before that time and after that time and after that time would be the kind we could predict..

How it harms it i still can't work out.

Here's the links you didn't read, explaining the answers to your questions about the Cambrian explosion

http://untemperedintellect.blogspot.co.uk/2014/06/creationists-and-cambrian-explosion.html

and

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cambrian_explosion

The cave paintings you are referring to were hoaxes, btw.

AND as for you foreverafter

There's a correlation between religion and everything. Over 90% of the world is religious, so how could there not be? But

Over 90% of the world is religious? Source please.

As for the correlation comment you are trying to imply.. I think you are misunderstanding how correlations work..

 

[methamaniac]

Wow you really don't investigate.
Do you just ask other evos for talking points

Hoaxes happen, do I need to bring up pilthdown man, Nebraska man, Heckel hoax etc.

The stegasaurus carving for example, is not even challenged as credible. As well as many others such as Sumerian carving.
Others such as man and dinosaur tracks are debateable but not debunked
Moreover it is the interpretation that's argued.

IT is took serious enough that many evos will say it is a possibility tbat some dinosaur could have survived to modern times.
They save themselves an out.
Kinda like with dino DNA

 

[rickolasnice]

The dinosaur prints with man has been debunked.. Although they resemble human footprints, they're not..

The stegosaurus carving, although vaguely resembling one, probably isn't one. It doesn't even look like one.. the only thing making it resemble one is the shapes along it's back..

http://paleo.cc/paluxy/stegosaur-claim.htm (read it)

Also found within the temple are a variety of creatures from mythological stories.

Can't find anything on the Samaritan carving.. link?

I addressed the dino DNA earlier and directed you to a link explaining it..

Ignoring the cambodian links again?

 

[methamaniac]

Ha, there are many look them up.
Seems you are at least searching now.

I will not do your work for you, as I am just keeping you lazy.

Hint for one:
Epic of Gilgamesh
ignore my links about cambrian layer?
edit: Sumerian
auto correct has mind of own

 

[rickolasnice]

Keeping me lazy? Huh?

I'm constantly searching

What are you saying the Epic of Gilgamesh and Sumerian tablets mean / imply?

Are you familiar with ancient astronaut theory? (Tis one i enjoy flirting with the idea it's true)

 

[sekio]

This thread keeps dragging on, and on, and on, and it's going nowhere.

By the time the 20th page has rolled around and everyone is acting like muppets, it's time to close the bar.

Closed