• Philosophy and Spirituality
    Welcome Guest
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
    Threads of Note Socialize
  • P&S Moderators: JackARoe

Does believing in Evolution say a lot about you

Status
Not open for further replies.
My comments offend you I am sorry. However the atrocities committed all over the world in the name of god offend me as well. Good day.
 
Ignorance doesn't offend me.

If you said all religious people were child molesters, that wouldn't offend me either.

While inarguably offensive to some, from my perspective it just makes you look bad.
 
So, you deleted the link after I responded to it and now you're reposting it on the next page of the same thread?

Punctuated equilibrium?
Can it solve the mystery?

Ideas are valid

You sound like Brody Stevens.
 
You can find supporting evidence of practically any theory on the internet, even theories that are bat shit insane.
 
Methmaniac: You will have success finding anomalies in the fossil record. They exist, because this isn't a recording system we are referring to, this is a random clustering of physical matter that we happen to be able to roughly interpret. If you find a piece of evidence that is counter to one thousand other pieces of evidence, this doesn't discount either side.


Living fossils do not discredit evolution. You are clearly not understanding that evolution is not a wilful process. There is no intent and no plan behind it. To have an expectation that all species will change dramatically is a misconception- mutation is random, though it can be anticipated. This does not mean it HAS to happen. And because it HASN'T happened in a few species does not override the fact that it HAS happened in many, many, many more.

Stop pretending this debate is about PE. You are moving the goalposts which is unfair and dishonest. If you choose to not see the truth, please leave the affairs of the world to those who do.

Why you focus on the few anomaies of the fossil record and yet overlook the zillion logical, historical and factual errors of the bible just confounds me. But I think its because you choose to be obscured.

The rejection of knowledge is a sign of insecurity, and all tyrannical regimes in history have tried to manipulate and control knowledge. Thank 'god', that time is largely over with :) <3 You cannot stop this from happening; at some point soon, humans will have grown up enough to accept our place in the universe and stop fucking everything up because we don't understand what is happening here. You are the product of millions of years of brutal and remorseless shaping by the planet; there can be no running from this. YOU are all the evidence for evolution ever required, and all the evidence to bury the scary god forever :)
 
Last edited:
*How Fish Evolved Out* ~An Ironic Tale,NOTHING Sc…: http://youtu.be/HZIHsqpRXvA

Willfully blind to 300 million years of no complex fossils
AS well willfully blind to a dragon fly not changing at all for millions and millions and millions of years.
Punctuated equilibrium, yeah that's what evolution predicts
Guess you got no problem seeing how a fish makes its way to land
maybe this funny illustration might help
somehow I dont think so
 
What that I have posted makes you think I think a mammal such as a whale for example, was some type of four legged creature that decided
to give up his advantages to go back in the water to get back the advantages the dumbass gave up in the first place.
Never mind the millions of millions of steps that would take from one mutation at a time?
 
Whale like ancestor giving way to a hippo as well as explaining modern day wales?
To clarify is this your rough flow
 
How do you explain animals that migrated back into (water)?

...

What that I have posted makes you think I think a mammal such as a whale for example, was some type of four legged creature that decided to give up his advantages to go back in the water to get back the advantages the dumbass gave up in the first place. Never mind the millions of millions of steps that would take from one mutation at a time?

...

Consider the hippopotamus.

...

No clarification is necessary.

If we have to decipher your posts, you can do a bit of work too.
 
Considered it
it didnt evolve from whale
I thought you wanted me to explain why I dont thinks so
 
IF memory serves me I believe there was some debate whether or not hippo had more in common with pig.
A yes or no wouldn't have killed u
 
^^
Thanks bro, hope you are well.

I am familiar with idea of supposed whale evolution.
Just trying to figure out what Einstein wanted to know.
A hippo dont convince me.
Nor do I believe my ancestors were whales.

You just dont come out of water and evolve lungs, just to go back in water where the gills you lost would come in much handy,
Just to come out the dam water again to gain back the legs you lost
Not logical
Certainly not from mutations, errors in coppying
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top