Higherfocus420
Bluelighter
Lately I prefer the high from synthetic cannabanoids much more than natural cannabis. It's not as enjoyable to smoke but I prefer the high its more euphoric I'm aware its much more addictive and dangerous.
Interesting. So, it's not just partial vs full agonist.Just a personal preference, but I’ve never tried synthetic Cannabinoids and never will. Reason:unknown binding affinities at CB1 and CB2 receptors. The potential danger imo lies in the fact that CB2 receptors all over the body. For example I think JWH-25(?) had an affinity for mitral valve CB2 receptors 10x that of Cannabis.
After many years of Cannabis consumption, I know how goodly and badly it can affect me. Not wanting to experiment on an unknown with serious risk potential I just decline the synths.
Tom
Yea some synthetic cannabanoids wear off quick and have no linger after affects like with weed even after I'm not high I will still feel monged out and stone over throughout the day with these I just feel completely normal probably due to other cannabanoids in weedWhat gets me is how different JWH-210 was from JWH-018. Here is the thing. Cannabis has a big mix of cannabinoids. Yet some of these synthetics were single substance that locked in receptors a little different from each other. JWH-210 was total couch lock, no head snappiness. JWH-018 was a mixture of head snappiness and couch lock. A few others I tried had no couch lock and wore off in half an hour. 5F-UR-144 was total head snappiness, for 20 minutes then wore off like you had nothing. No couch lock. JWH-210 lasted 3-4 hours.
So the study that can be done with some of these synthetics and how the receptors work should have been important. Instead they just get banned and now we have this whole area of study just sitting.
Honestly I only had a few of these when they first came out. I really thought they were fascinating. But even on a board like this they get demonized and labelled as bad. Sure I agree we do not have to ingest it to study it. But now no one can study it.
Do the newer blends of these synthetic cannabinoids resemble cannabis at all? I remember I had a gram and a half (or so) of JWH-018, a nice white powder. Lasted about 2 years. Measured it in a solution to get about 50 mgs in a gram of parsley and that was strong enough to where one hit felt like 2 or 3 hits of good cannabis. I had a couple of small amounts of others after that but then stopped. I did really like JWH-018. Kept it light enough to not see anything sinister. However I did OD once trying to get it right. Had the most terrifying high, seconds felt like minutes. I had to hold on. After that I was cautious.
Thankfully cannabis is legal where I am. Have not had a synthetic in over 10 years. But when I see videos of people smoking the new spice it does not look like a cannabis high but a strong drug high.
^ Whoa CC. I remember reading about such extreme use with people. That is an awful lot of full spectrum use. I always wondered how people go through gram of that in a week. That’s probably like smoking 2 pounds of weed in that time probably more, probably much more.
Hopefully you’re able to smoke a little weed these days CC, I suspect CHS can remedy itself if people take care. In fact, I had been reading about people that continue smoking, and eventually it goes away for some people so hopefully you didn’t wreck that whole cannabinoid system. Fascinating.
I always thought it was stupid that they scheduled some of these cannabinoids because there was a lot to learn from them.
Yeah, that sounds like a nightmare, maybe cannabinoid receptors finally say fuck you, who knows. In an autoimmune type of way. I know drugs do turn on people at times, just never really heard it too much with weed until CHS. We know lots of other drugs can turn on people in a bad way. With CHS it seems the experiences are all over the board, I’m always looking for a reason why something like that would happen.My CHS is a nightmare and i cannot smoke Weed at all without rolling the dice ill get hit with a flareup and then vomit for a week straight.
Interesting. So, it's not just partial vs full agonist.
∆8 has more affinity for CB2 and thus makes your tolerance shoot up, but it's a partial agonist.
CB1 and CB2 are a thing with the smoke shop cannabinoids. I did not know about subtypes of CB2.
Are ther subtypes of CB1?
Late to the game answering this. No, not synths as you are likely thinking of them.I don’t know about smoke shop cannabinoids (synths, right?); but there just are CB2 receptors all over the body, except not in the brain where the CB1 receptors sit. The best way I have of explaining it is that there is a body/organism wide endocannabinoid signalling network using the body’s natural cannabinoids. Here is a link from the University of South Carolina
![]()
People produce endocannabinoids – similar to compounds found in marijuana – that are critical to many bodily functions
Professors of pathology, microbiology and immunology Prakash Nagarkatti and Mitzi Nagarkatti write for The Conversation on endocannabinoids, compounds found in humans that are similar to those found in marijuana.sc.edu
Two natural endocannabinoids in people are anandamide, or AEA, and 2-arachidonoyl glycerol, known as 2-AG.
Some people call Cannabis the ‘tree of life’ or a ‘gift from God’. Maybe certain branches of human evolution have prospered (or died out) b/c of an ability or inability to respond to this plant. The reason I’m scared (honestly and literally) of synths is that they have different abilities to bind to different receptors all over the body. I just don’t know if scientists have isolated, purified and sequenced CB2 receptors…..and found or not differences.
Tom
Late to the game answering this. No, not synths as you are likely thinking of them.
∆8THC was the first and is the most common. It hits CB2 receptors harder than CB1. As you likely know, ∆9THC hits the CB1 harder than the CB2.
Well, the thing that is definitely an issue is that people take larger doses of ∆8 to get the same CB1 effects. Then tolerance skyrockets due to the large CB2 effect.Ah, and CB2 receptors are found all over the body. I didn't know that about delta 8 and it MAY explain toxicity. Dosage is also key. A light dose of delta 8 felt very mild but these were sold in The Netherlands as being 'the legal ones' although the PSA bans everything and anything that's mind-altering 'if consumed' but seems crazy because isopropanol is freely available....
UK law would struggle with anything 'dual use', Starter fluid has ether in it, doesn't it? But that's not banned. In Africa people huff petrol (gasoline) and I don't see Shell in court.