We are on the same page. I don't wan't home chemists either, but if you could buy the drug at lets saw wallymart......whatever would you be compelled to synth for? If I understood you right. Im guessing walmart would find the cheapest synth possible and be able to outprice your homemade bathtub drug? I feel like im missin somethin but maybe not. Also would prefer 'drugs' being made by folk with chemistry degrees.....a whole team of em preferably. Nope not for you makin meth in the garage. If we are going to do things let us do them professionally. God bless reagent tests.
Correct, I most certainly want my "stuff" (basically all controlled/scheduled substances/chemicals & analogues)
to be synthesized by a man/woman with a PhD in Medicinal Research Chemistry (at the very least).
I probably should add here without giving away too many identifiers, you know, the kind that could bite your ass later, that while by the legal definition and technical wording of a certain licensing board, my friend typing this just will not be able to refer to himself as either a Medicinal Chemist or Research Pharmacologist. Rather or not those titles were ever in play is something my friend asked that we all just move on from. If however you feel strongly that I've stereotyped certain professions or have actually told something simply not true, then my friend ask that you feel more than free to go back and either research what's being said in a broader sense, or actually go bring it up with your current medical "professional". My friend recommends for the closest to honesty or truth you'd like to get from them, time has shown they are more open to discussion after hours, not while they're running an EKG on another patient. This is simply my friends experience and it has served him well.
At this point I want to bring up, who knows what, how do they know this, why does public perseption think otherwise?
Finally, no matter what it may seem, absolutely no research, clinical trials, studies, new medications or surgical techniques. are honestly be developed, or researched for you, and to make the world a better place. Before you bark at me, I adknowledge, yea, there are medical personal who truly care about the wellbeing of others. That being said, it takes money, so much fucking money to even get a research project off the ground, that lets say even in roughly ten years they have proven the treatment effeective, now they need to get that money back, not only that money, as much money as they can possible take, in the end, from you, the patients. Why, because in this shit for care health industry of ours, the company that's already developed a new drug, will basically do "WHATEVER BECOMES NECESSARY" to ensure FDA APPROVAL for as many indications as possible for the new medication.
I need to drive home a point here. There are more than just one reason a medication is considered addictive. It may be because of the euphoria induced, sexual stimulation. disinhibition, need to compulsivly redose, etc. But there is one SINGLE OVER ARCHING FACT ABOUT ALL CONTROLLED MEDICATIONS: THEY DO EXACTLY WHAT THEY SAY THEYLL DO, EACH AND EVERY TIME. TRANSLATION: FOR MOST OF THE POPULATION, >75-80%, if a person takes an amphetamine, their energy will increase, focus will sharpen, etc. Moving on, Concerning Opiate Based Pain Medications: Again, >80-85% that take the medication will have a marked reduction in pain, a calming sense for most, even some euphoria. Again Benzodiazepines: >70-75% of patients receiving diazepam (used in hospitals mainly for prep-op), nearly 3/4's felt reduction in anxiety, muscle relaxation, some sedation, and some a slight euphoria.
The reason these numbers: *Medication rate of effectiveness (%) in population prescribed* Compared to medications in other classes, the other medications, such as SSRI's, SNRI's, DNRI's, tricyclic-antidepressants, typical & atypical antipsychotics, 1st or 2nd Generation antihistamines, muscles relaxers-Robaxin, Flexeril, etc,-have yet to meet anyone that says those med relax any damn thing. Later in this post, I will get to the "Percentage level of effectiveness" the fda will okay as acceptable and you all can tell my friend whether they seem acceptable or basically useless, and that more-likely-than-not, the placebo effect is coming into play for anyone taking a medicine longer than say a day, and hasn't noticed shit, much less the usual bullshit the doctor will tell you, "You need to give it about 4-6 weeks" then well see where your at...Now my friend and all you reader know how we can boots serotonin, dopamine levels quite easily and effectively. (No not always Amphetamines, but correctly used they'll do it to, in about an hour
Let's say, for example, we know things least more effective than Celexa's and Lexapro's 26-30% "improvement in symptoms starting around week four".......i Promise you all will enjoy the rest of this unnecessarily long ass, yet informative post reply.
If this turns out not to be so true, I highly recommend the hundreds of thousands of other post waiting for your time.
I'll be back to finish this post tomorrow evening.