Suploris
Bluelighter
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2013
- Messages
- 51
So since entering the 'MDMA-scene' I have heard many people talk about all the different pills they tried and what they were like. On pillreports for example, many people state some pills containing MDMA being 'the best pill ever' and others being slightly more 'average'.
Obviously I know that pills that contain bunk will not be as good as pills that contain clean MDMA. However, I also see many people comparing different pills to one another even though all of them contain roughly the same amount of MDMA and nothing else. Isn't this completely useless? All pills contain the same compound: MDMA. Therefore the difference in experience will depend on setting/amount ingested/people you're with/time since last roll and not on the pill itself. It's basically like saying 'I get way more drunk when drinking whiskey than when I drink vodka'.
Am I right to assume that any topics discussing which clean MDMA pill is best are completely useless or is there really a difference between pills that cannot be explained?
Obviously I know that pills that contain bunk will not be as good as pills that contain clean MDMA. However, I also see many people comparing different pills to one another even though all of them contain roughly the same amount of MDMA and nothing else. Isn't this completely useless? All pills contain the same compound: MDMA. Therefore the difference in experience will depend on setting/amount ingested/people you're with/time since last roll and not on the pill itself. It's basically like saying 'I get way more drunk when drinking whiskey than when I drink vodka'.
Am I right to assume that any topics discussing which clean MDMA pill is best are completely useless or is there really a difference between pills that cannot be explained?
