edgarshade
Bluelighter
The pro-drugs lobby never sleeps. Can we trust wobbly Dave to silence fresh demands for legalisation?
By Kathy Gyngell
PUBLISHED: 17:12, 24 April 2012 | UPDATED: 17:12, 24 April 2012
With reader comments
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/a...h-demands-legalisation.html?ito=feeds-newsxml
By Kathy Gyngell
PUBLISHED: 17:12, 24 April 2012 | UPDATED: 17:12, 24 April 2012
With reader comments
You might think that with a Conservative-led government there would be no prospect of decriminalising drugs, let alone of legalising them. Well think again. Crazy as this idea might seem, it is not off the agenda. The obsessive pro-drugs lobbies have not given up.
In fact, backed by the coffers of the cannabis 'toking' Sir Richard Branson and the multi billionaire George Soros, they have been making some headway.
Last year their latest drugs-legalising public relations offensive, fronted by the important sounding but self styled ‘Global Commission on Drug Policy’, succeeded in its first objective. This body’s report and its massively exaggerated claims of spiraling drug use captured the headlines. So too did the thesis that the ‘war on drugs’ has failed, and that, therefore, drugs must be decriminalised if not legalised. The Commission advocates surrender rather than stepping up the fight.
Today Russell Brand’s ‘evidence’ was sought too. He argued that his previous arrests for drugs possession had wasted police time. He thought that the mitigating circumstance of his addiction ‘illness’ should put him and other drug users above the law.
So far Keith Vaz appears to be holding the line. He is on record as saying the case for decriminalisation has not yet been made. He assured me that they had not been influenced by pro decriminalisation drug lobbies.
It is sad that his instinct was not strong enough to stop him setting out on this crazy and extravagant inquiry into the ‘merits’ of decriminalisation in the first place.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/a...h-demands-legalisation.html?ito=feeds-newsxml
