How do you work that out, Tromps? I can understand creationism (not young earth creationism), whereby God set the parameter / started life, but young earth creationism and intelligent design simply cannot go hand in hand with science.. they contradict each other.. unless I am misunderstanding what intelligent design is?
Meth.. The fact you still think that species or evolution thinks it needs to do something in order to survive (akin to Lemarcks theory of evolution) proves you still have no idea what Dawins theory of evolution is..
How do you expect to debunk something you don't understand? Your arguments are nothing more that copy paste jobs from uneducated, ignorant, misinformed idiots.. as highlighted by your copy and paste job:
"They found that the appendix seems to make several appearances and a few disappearances throughout the supposed evolutionary history of mammals. Indeed, they found at least 32 events (and possibly as many as 38 events) in which the appendix evolved independently. This means that among the 50 species which currently have a recognizable appendix, most of them evolved it completely independently of the others. Thus, the appendix is not only functional, its function in mammals is so important that it had to evolve independently most of the time! They also found as many as six times when the appendix had to disappear as a result of evolution. The authors conclude
Referring to this study:
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1631068312001960 which says no such thing.
The people that wrote your copy paste job can't even comprehend what a simple study like that says let alone what it implies yet you think these people know more about evolutionary biology than evolution biologists.
Instead of looking for answers to your questions (which are easily found) you come here with the creationist HOW THEN DID THIS HAPPEN? and then ignore every bit of explanation with evidence to back it up.. only to randomly pick another question.. and repeat.
I have answered SO many of your questions, provided evidence and links and not once have you acknowledged the evidence, much less responded coherently and not once formed a rebuttal. Posting another, unrelated question is not a rebuttal.
If there is a gap in our understanding of evolutionary history (to which there are many) this does not negate what we know, this does not negate the evidence that we have, it does not mean that we will not come to understand it and it definitely doesn't imply "God did it".
Why not spend some times reading over the site I've posted many times
http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrary/article/evo_01 properly.. then, if you have more questions why not look for the answer in science, either a journal, article or get your ass to a museum, instead of looking for an argument on a creationist website.
I know you won't read it and if you do, understand it.. but the answer to your current question:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1594990/pdf/joa_1991_0153.pdf
Also.. you haven't answered one of my questions about creationism.. "I don't know what perfect is" is fckin pathetic.
See where I post 8 verses where God orders rape? And your response is one where rape is wrong when the woman is set to be wed? And then you bring up teeth? Where is the logic?