-
MDMA &
Empathogenic
Drugs
Welcome Guest! -
MDMA Moderators: Esperighanto
chemically insane is a nazi vs. lets not get ahead of ourselves
- Thread starter the toad
- Start date
- Status
Tripman
Bluelight Crew
People like to post opinion as fact.
Teenagers generally.
CI is not a fool - school most definitely is cool.
*prepares for denigratory remarks*
Teenagers generally.
CI is not a fool - school most definitely is cool.
*prepares for denigratory remarks*
i don't mean total imprints - i mean how many pills total were consumed in that area in that time? 1000? 10,000? 100,000?
alasdair
Now how am I supposed to know that number? What does it matter if there all eating the same presses that's listed on pr?
NeighborhoodThreat
Bluelight Crew
^If you don't know that number, then how could you know how many of those pills contain MDMA?
Pillreports doesn't even claim to know (or estimate) the actual amount of total pills out there that do or do not contain MDMA. There's a reason for that. Because they don't know.
Pillreports doesn't even claim to know (or estimate) the actual amount of total pills out there that do or do not contain MDMA. There's a reason for that. Because they don't know.
Huh? That make no.sense. if u take the average off of pr and put it with the pills that aren't listed however many more that are u would get the same percentages. What does how many pills actually consumed have to do with how many contain mdma? 110 presses is a large enough sample to be able to determine the percentages of real/bunk.
NeighborhoodThreat
Bluelight Crew
How do you know that the pills submitted to PR are a complete sample of all the pills around?
Answer: You don't.
Answer: You don't.
Ur just grabbing for air now. 110 samples is more then enough to come up w a percentage. Unless ur claiming there's 1000 other presses circulating that region then ur argument holds no water. And let me remind u were talking bout domestic pills not imported molly or Dutch pills.
NeighborhoodThreat
Bluelight Crew
Do you understand the concept of sampling?
I'm not trying to bust your balls here man, but there are some simple statistics concepts that you are blatantly ignoring.
I'm not trying to bust your balls here man, but there are some simple statistics concepts that you are blatantly ignoring.
Blanch
Bluelighter
- Joined
- Jul 24, 2011
- Messages
- 255
im so glad this has its own thread now. Before reading however, everyone should play this in the background:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UMf40daefsI
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UMf40daefsI
the toad
Bluelighter
This reasoning only works if there are the exact same number of pills made of each different press...
Ive also seen lots of pills that arent on edata or pillreports...
Last edited:
Tripman
Bluelight Crew
It is enough to come up with a percentage of pills listed on PR containing MDMA.
It is not enough to come up with a percentage of all pills in any geographical area containing MDMA.
Not everyone uses PR. I would say there are more people that dont use it, than those that do.
NeighborhoodThreat
Bluelight Crew
^Exactly.
You guys need to take a basic statistics course.
You guys need to take a basic statistics course.
Folley
Bluelighter
No one claims to know the EXACT number of fake pills going around, who the fuck cares anyways. The point is the overwhelming majority of pills being sold contain no MDMA.
That is the only thing that matters, to argue for anything else is pointless and derails any thread.
That is the only thing that matters, to argue for anything else is pointless and derails any thread.
Tripman
Bluelight Crew
the toad
Bluelighter
You did pick a number, four different ones actually from 60% to 90%...
I care, your missing the point, if you say "the majority of pills contain no mdma", THAT IS A FACT... if you say "90% of pills contain no mdma", THAT IS SPECULATION...
Tripman
Bluelight Crew
I think this poll needs a third option:
"People presenting speculation as fact should go back to school"
"People presenting speculation as fact should go back to school"
Folley
Bluelighter
I care, your missing the point, if you say "the majority of pills contain no mdma", THAT IS A FACT... if you say "90% of pills contain no mdma", THAT IS SPECULATION...
I think you're missing the point, none of this would have happened if you would have just left it alone. I didn't even IMPLY that it was EVER an exact number, in the beginning I even used a speculatory phrase.
Tripman
Bluelight Crew
It's comments such as this that are rather unsatisfactory Folley:
Contradiction much?
Contradiction much?
Folley
Bluelighter
Why don't you go ahead and link to the thread I said that in as well? Then tell me he didn't take pipes.
It might not be 100% but there was no doubt in my mind.
It might not be 100% but there was no doubt in my mind.
- Status