bit_pattern
Ex-Bluelighter
- Joined
- Oct 17, 2008
- Messages
- 8,127
Yeah noone could spend that much time arguing a cause if they weren't being compensated for their time 

Ah Rachamim...his raw verbosity suggested to me that either that's just what happens when you take massive amounts of morphine all day and sit at the keyboard or he really was getting paid to post (if not at bluelight, then elsewhere). At least he could write coherently and provide facts (if often misleadingly so).
ebola
I have to say that the government is really basically just a group of rich people trying to make money. They essentially just get voted in only because there is nobody else to choose from and fuck people over pretty badly.
This isn't really a trip report, but I need this to be heard by anybody who is on here. I have to say that the government is really basically just a group of rich people trying to make money. They essentially just get voted in only because there is nobody else to choose from and fuck people over pretty badly. I cannot stand the government and if they come after me and beat me to death for saying this I honestly don't give a fuck. I got no drugs on me and all my posts were fake, I don't do drugs, never have and never will so you CIA people got nothing to arrest me for then. No drugs at my place, no weed, nothing. I just have an important message to get out there to everyone.
I have several problems with the American oligarchy. One is that the people have little say. I believe that George Bush only got elected due to rigging of the elections in both 2000 and 2004. He is a fraud and sucks cock. Bush sucks cock end of story. Bush is a fag, somebody told me that he sucks dick and is a fag. Fuck George Bush, seriously, he's a homo I heard from this guy who said he knew somebody who knew somebody who knew somebody who knew somebody who knew somebody that Bush and Cheney were butt buddies or so I heard from Bush's friend of a friend of a friend of a friend of a friendLike a game of political telephone
Anyways, for the solid evidence of this. The 2000 election was determined by the supreme court. That says it all right there. Gore won by a couple thousand votes but the supreme court decided otherwise on a technicality. In 2004, there was voter intimidation where people were told if they voted they would get arrested. http://www.nytimes.com/2004/08/16/opinion/16herbert.html
Also, the incidents on 9/11 I believe were actually done by George Bush and not even Osama Bin Laden although I hope Bin laden gets ass raped by satan because I still hate the fucker. He probably is being sodomized by satan as we speak. Fuck bin laden! But also, George Bush is a cocksucker as well and he actually was responsible for 9/11 I believe and have solid proof of this. There was molten fucking steel found in the towers months later. This is proof to me that it was an inside job. Also, the towers collapsed due to "fire" yet no building has in the history of mankind. Sure, buildings got burned out but never did a steel tower fucking collapse! Also, there was no plane at the pentagon it was a missile, clearly. The pentagon had no debris of a large aircraft. Also, the plane at the towers was a government aircraft and slow motion films show this. Do your research, the government did 9/11, Bush rigged the election and the government is fucked up as hell. The CIA can suck my cock. I can say whatever I want, freedom of speech motherfuckers
i never understood the hypothesis that any elite would want a reduction in population, could someone explain that? the elite, by the very nature of being elite, won't have to worry about competing for resources of space or materials, so why would they want less people? If anything, i'd think that they'd benefit from more people, as the higher you are in an economic food-chain, the more benefits you get from those beneath you.
i never understood the hypothesis that any elite would want a reduction in population, could someone explain that? the elite, by the very nature of being elite, won't have to worry about competing for resources of space or materials, so why would they want less people? If anything, i'd think that they'd benefit from more people, as the higher you are in an economic food-chain, the more benefits you get from those beneath you.
The elite want there to be less people and may decide at some point to "depopulate" because all the other non elite people are using resources that they could have.
With less people, the elite could consume all the oil and resources they wanted.
The ruling class is the ruling class because the rest of us make it possible.
What are the "elites" (ruling class) going to do with the Earth's resources without a huge population to extract, process, manufacture, distribute and most importantly, buy them?
The elite want there to be less people and may decide at some point to "depopulate" because all the other non elite people are using resources that they could have. With less people, the elite could consume all the oil and resources they wanted. I think one day they might go underground and possibly kill off everyone, including their own citizens using nuclear devices. The rich will hide in underground caves while nuclear bombs go off above.
The shrugging Atlas concept is nonsense, really.
It was the IMF or world bank that said something on a very similar theme to your point there, if i'm reading you correctly. will try to find it.Well, we have seen a variety of economies (and sub-economies) within a variety of major modes of production (some capitalist) where demand for finished products is rooted in luxury goods and services consumed by those elites who control the means of production and laboring process. One can look to colonial economies where local elites and metropolitan rulers consume at extremely elevated rates, employing numerous servants, etc. I would expect such configurations to be more unstable than economies tempered by Keynsian stimuli aimed at wide consumer-classes, as such stimuli tend to stave revolt, ideologically and materially.
ebola