• Current Events & Politics
    Welcome Guest
    Please read before posting:
    Forum Guidelines Bluelight Rules
  • Current Events & Politics Moderators: deficiT | tryptakid | Foreigner

CEPS Well Hung Parliament (CEPS Social/Off Topic)

Yeah noone could spend that much time arguing a cause if they weren't being compensated for their time 8o
 
Ah Rachamim...his raw verbosity suggested to me that either that's just what happens when you take massive amounts of morphine all day and sit at the keyboard or he really was getting paid to post (if not at bluelight, then elsewhere). At least he could write coherently and provide facts (if often misleadingly so).

ebola

Take it back! The man was a Saint. He never cited anything...You know how much research tunnels I had to go through to prove that stubborn bastard wrong? My God the knowledge I've gained just out of him calling me an anti-semite repeatedly. I fucking loved him, I would pay him to post again. He used to be so adorable when attacking posters, he would etch out his argument in roman numerals! May God bring him back to us swiftly.
 
Don't you understand? When the anti-semitic level of this website gets to a certain level he just appears and throws down.
thehebrewhammer2.jpg
 
Wooo, Michigan has passed a minimum wage increase law which goes into effect tomorrow (Labor day in the US). Bottom earners will be receiving over a full dollar increase starting tomorrow, and end up at a $2 increase by 2017. It's not much, but is good news nonetheless.

In b4 economy crumbles and the four horsemen of the fortune 500 are released upon the state.
 
The Government's Stance On The People

This isn't really a trip report, but I need this to be heard by anybody who is on here. I have to say that the government is really basically just a group of rich people trying to make money. They essentially just get voted in only because there is nobody else to choose from and fuck people over pretty badly. I cannot stand the government and if they come after me and beat me to death for saying this I honestly don't give a fuck. I got no drugs on me and all my posts were fake, I don't do drugs, never have and never will so you CIA people got nothing to arrest me for then. No drugs at my place, no weed, nothing. I just have an important message to get out there to everyone.

I have several problems with the American oligarchy. One is that the people have little say. I believe that George Bush only got elected due to rigging of the elections in both 2000 and 2004. He is a fraud and sucks cock. Bush sucks cock end of story. Bush is a fag, somebody told me that he sucks dick and is a fag. Fuck George Bush, seriously, he's a homo I heard from this guy who said he knew somebody who knew somebody who knew somebody who knew somebody who knew somebody that Bush and Cheney were butt buddies or so I heard from Bush's friend of a friend of a friend of a friend of a friend 8o Like a game of political telephone :)

Anyways, for the solid evidence of this. The 2000 election was determined by the supreme court. That says it all right there. Gore won by a couple thousand votes but the supreme court decided otherwise on a technicality. In 2004, there was voter intimidation where people were told if they voted they would get arrested. http://www.nytimes.com/2004/08/16/opinion/16herbert.html

Also, the incidents on 9/11 I believe were actually done by George Bush and not even Osama Bin Laden although I hope Bin laden gets ass raped by satan because I still hate the fucker. He probably is being sodomized by satan as we speak. Fuck bin laden! But also, George Bush is a cocksucker as well and he actually was responsible for 9/11 I believe and have solid proof of this. There was molten fucking steel found in the towers months later. This is proof to me that it was an inside job. Also, the towers collapsed due to "fire" yet no building has in the history of mankind. Sure, buildings got burned out but never did a steel tower fucking collapse! Also, there was no plane at the pentagon it was a missile, clearly. The pentagon had no debris of a large aircraft. Also, the plane at the towers was a government aircraft and slow motion films show this. Do your research, the government did 9/11, Bush rigged the election and the government is fucked up as hell. The CIA can suck my cock. I can say whatever I want, freedom of speech motherfuckers
 
This isn't really a trip report, but I need this to be heard by anybody who is on here. I have to say that the government is really basically just a group of rich people trying to make money. They essentially just get voted in only because there is nobody else to choose from and fuck people over pretty badly. I cannot stand the government and if they come after me and beat me to death for saying this I honestly don't give a fuck. I got no drugs on me and all my posts were fake, I don't do drugs, never have and never will so you CIA people got nothing to arrest me for then. No drugs at my place, no weed, nothing. I just have an important message to get out there to everyone.

I have several problems with the American oligarchy. One is that the people have little say. I believe that George Bush only got elected due to rigging of the elections in both 2000 and 2004. He is a fraud and sucks cock. Bush sucks cock end of story. Bush is a fag, somebody told me that he sucks dick and is a fag. Fuck George Bush, seriously, he's a homo I heard from this guy who said he knew somebody who knew somebody who knew somebody who knew somebody who knew somebody that Bush and Cheney were butt buddies or so I heard from Bush's friend of a friend of a friend of a friend of a friend 8o Like a game of political telephone :)

Anyways, for the solid evidence of this. The 2000 election was determined by the supreme court. That says it all right there. Gore won by a couple thousand votes but the supreme court decided otherwise on a technicality. In 2004, there was voter intimidation where people were told if they voted they would get arrested. http://www.nytimes.com/2004/08/16/opinion/16herbert.html

Also, the incidents on 9/11 I believe were actually done by George Bush and not even Osama Bin Laden although I hope Bin laden gets ass raped by satan because I still hate the fucker. He probably is being sodomized by satan as we speak. Fuck bin laden! But also, George Bush is a cocksucker as well and he actually was responsible for 9/11 I believe and have solid proof of this. There was molten fucking steel found in the towers months later. This is proof to me that it was an inside job. Also, the towers collapsed due to "fire" yet no building has in the history of mankind. Sure, buildings got burned out but never did a steel tower fucking collapse! Also, there was no plane at the pentagon it was a missile, clearly. The pentagon had no debris of a large aircraft. Also, the plane at the towers was a government aircraft and slow motion films show this. Do your research, the government did 9/11, Bush rigged the election and the government is fucked up as hell. The CIA can suck my cock. I can say whatever I want, freedom of speech motherfuckers

maxresdefault.jpg
 
With all the news about the global warming "hiatus", why isn't their speculation that the Illuminati are using chemtrails to offset the beginning of global warming, so most of the population won't believe in it? Then when global warming hits the tipping point (and chemtrails aren't effective anymore), the massive temperature increase will result in a massive die-off of the human population, thus allowing the Illuminati their sparsely populated, idyllic Eden?
 
i never understood the hypothesis that any elite would want a reduction in population, could someone explain that? the elite, by the very nature of being elite, won't have to worry about competing for resources of space or materials, so why would they want less people? If anything, i'd think that they'd benefit from more people, as the higher you are in an economic food-chain, the more benefits you get from those beneath you.
 
i never understood the hypothesis that any elite would want a reduction in population, could someone explain that? the elite, by the very nature of being elite, won't have to worry about competing for resources of space or materials, so why would they want less people? If anything, i'd think that they'd benefit from more people, as the higher you are in an economic food-chain, the more benefits you get from those beneath you.

Lol, you not supposed to apply logic, sheeeesh 8)

The other bit about depopulation I find amusing is that clearly the elites are pretty incompetent because they've been running the world for god knows how long now and population continues to grow exponentially =D
 
i never understood the hypothesis that any elite would want a reduction in population, could someone explain that? the elite, by the very nature of being elite, won't have to worry about competing for resources of space or materials, so why would they want less people? If anything, i'd think that they'd benefit from more people, as the higher you are in an economic food-chain, the more benefits you get from those beneath you.

The elite want there to be less people and may decide at some point to "depopulate" because all the other non elite people are using resources that they could have. With less people, the elite could consume all the oil and resources they wanted. I think one day they might go underground and possibly kill off everyone, including their own citizens using nuclear devices. The rich will hide in underground caves while nuclear bombs go off above.
 
The elite want there to be less people and may decide at some point to "depopulate" because all the other non elite people are using resources that they could have.

With less people, the elite could consume all the oil and resources they wanted.

Connect these two concepts. When you say these "non-elites" are using resources, you mean that they're buying these resources. What are the "elites" (ruling class) going to do with the Earth's resources without a huge population to extract, process, manufacture, distribute and most importantly, buy them? They would be useless materials. A vast population in itself is a very important resource, labor. It's probably the most important resource available as it is required to extract, to process, to manufacture, to distribute and to buy.

The ruling class is the ruling class because the rest of us make it possible. The shrugging Atlas concept is nonsense, really.
 
What are the "elites" (ruling class) going to do with the Earth's resources without a huge population to extract, process, manufacture, distribute and most importantly, buy them?

Well, we have seen a variety of economies (and sub-economies) within a variety of major modes of production (some capitalist) where demand for finished products is rooted in luxury goods and services consumed by those elites who control the means of production and laboring process. One can look to colonial economies where local elites and metropolitan rulers consume at extremely elevated rates, employing numerous servants, etc. I would expect such configurations to be more unstable than economies tempered by Keynsian stimuli aimed at wide consumer-classes, as such stimuli tend to stave revolt, ideologically and materially.

ebola
 
The elite want there to be less people and may decide at some point to "depopulate" because all the other non elite people are using resources that they could have. With less people, the elite could consume all the oil and resources they wanted. I think one day they might go underground and possibly kill off everyone, including their own citizens using nuclear devices. The rich will hide in underground caves while nuclear bombs go off above.

and do all their own work? i mean, aren't we expecting to be able to prospect on asteroids / in space at some not-too-distant future?

When i picture the 'sinister elite' that ppl refer to when they talk about de-population, all i can think is that such a mindset would sooner enslave, than eradicate, surplus citizenry.
 
bardo nailed it: *labor* The value of people, particularly if you get them to the level of true slavery, is far more than the value of keeping them alive/working.


The shrugging Atlas concept is nonsense, really.

that's not exactly the point i see in shrugging atlas though, i definitely interpret it far more as "I'd rather live far more modestly in a society w/o a single moocher/looter, than be a god of the society of moochers/looters" Whatever you think of the morality of that, it's what rand was trying to get across:
- "who cleans the toilet in galt's gultch?" this is commonly said here, but in galt's gultch they clearly are doing menial jobs, i mean the richest banker on the planet is growing the tobacco, they're cooking their own meals, dagny is galt's paid maid.
- galt is offered position of economic dictator and a billion dollars to help the country, but won't.

the idea being that it'd be better to have a far, far smaller piece of pie go to each 'producer', than to have larger pieces from a much larger pie, if any looter/moocher got to eat, too; it wasn't about maximizing one's income, so much as minimizing unearned income.
 
Well, we have seen a variety of economies (and sub-economies) within a variety of major modes of production (some capitalist) where demand for finished products is rooted in luxury goods and services consumed by those elites who control the means of production and laboring process. One can look to colonial economies where local elites and metropolitan rulers consume at extremely elevated rates, employing numerous servants, etc. I would expect such configurations to be more unstable than economies tempered by Keynsian stimuli aimed at wide consumer-classes, as such stimuli tend to stave revolt, ideologically and materially.

ebola
It was the IMF or world bank that said something on a very similar theme to your point there, if i'm reading you correctly. will try to find it.
[edit: gotta love your History function :) http://www.bluelight.org/vb/threads...ng-to-economic-growth?p=12198553#post12198553
I think this makes a lot of sense and that, for better prosperity amongst the ruling class, it's better to have less inequality. That can sound counter-intuitive, but it's not a short-term, "gimme more pie right now" idea, it's "i get more pie in the end, if we grow a larger pie, and that pie grows faster if i don't take it all this minute"
My example, using slaves as the extreme, wasn't meant to buck that idea, but just to be a different extreme contrasted against de-population.. i still think the point came across though, even though bardo just saying 'labor' is far more efficient :) ]
 
Top