SmokingAces
Bluelighter
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2014
- Messages
- 2,301
Yes they are completely different, unfortunately a character reference would be, imo,about as much use in both situations unfortunately ( well, not unfortunately for the cunt who killed that copper)... This isn't a job interview, this is crown court and still a fairly serious offence which the establishment take a very dim view on. Unless he knows someone with some serious clout I can't see a character reference making a scrap of difference. He has no viable defence imo, the channel the court and prosecution will say that matey who is already serving time should of made the warden know he was in danger, which is clearly not a good idea if you are actually in danger, but that's what they'll say.
Yeah actually I should of emphasized that more, you would have to know respectable people. Lecturers, local Counselors, restaurant owners, religious priests... Any of their word would hold a bit more weight and could help a bit at least create the impression of a good man making a very stupid mistake which he now regrets and is very sorry for, knows he must be punished but asks for forgiveness.
Chances are the guy who is already inside won't tell them who was threatening him incase of reprisal. It'd be safer for him to say it was just for financial gain which again, fucks over the OP who took the drugs in...
You can't be serious? Be safer to say it was for financial gain? Do not try this at home.
Last edited by a moderator: