• HEALTH & RECOVERY
    Welcome Guest
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules Thread Directory 1 Thread Directory 2
    Mindfulness Links Addiction & Mind
    Sober Living Partner Program (SLiPP)
  • H&R Moderators: VerbalTruist

Any vegans in the house?

asecin is a troll; lacking in reading comprehension and moral decency.
 
asecin said:
no shit people dont listen. being judgmental, criticizing people is just awful.
not everyone will enjoy what you eat. and besides many might feel so much better not spending so much on food (actually be happier) than spend on "healthy" food (oxymoron btw cuz food causes oxidation no matter what antioxidants you take so there is never healthy food or healthy air or healthy water). you naturally decay. i guess some people are not as obsessed as you are and some others who have addiction to live up 100 if possible and be "healthy". not completely true at all food influences so much your ability to live well. i know of many people accomplishing things in life based on eating cheap and not what you obsessive food addicts call "healthy food". simply because they have better genes. yes, it is mainly and most importantly based on genes. like some people do not even have certain enzymes to digest all types of plant food. anyway, i dont expect you stop criticizing, or just being judgmental of people. i guess your character is such. :/
Click to expand...

Haha. Well after nearly dying in my early twenties from an autoimmune disease, I will say that I am thankful for my "obsession". It saved my life. :)

Anyhow, you clearly *and this is not just based on this conversation but with the way you've treated others here as well* can't have a discussion without being rude, so I am done with you now. Good day!
 
Mehm said:
asecin: So everything is "unhealthy" in your opinion? Do you live in America? Very strange view points you have....
Click to expand...


life is not that. its competition and evolution. based on genes and everything else is just a waste of time. SIMPLY PUT TO A SIMPLY ASKED QUESTION.

MynameisnotDeja is a good example. she is obsessed with "healthy foods" and the idea of living long and being super healthy and stuff. the idea behind this more simple than anything. she is able to concetrate on positive things in life, positive attitude and energy and avoid all negativity associated with actual facts in life. ignorance is a bliss and i dont doubt she is leading a good life. just not a person i can reason with is all.

Changed said:
asecin is a troll; lacking in reading comprehension and moral decency.
Click to expand...

im the troll ? only a troll will write such short sentence accusing someone ELSE of such crap as "lacking reading comprehension and moral decency" :\

MynameisnotDeja said:
Haha. Well after nearly dying in my early twenties from an autoimmune disease, I will say that I am thankful for my "obsession". It saved my life. :)

Anyhow, you clearly *and this is not just based on this conversation but with the way you've treated others here as well* can't have a discussion without being rude, so I am done with you now. Good day!
Click to expand...


im not surprised. i knew you will do one of those tricks where you go "oh you are rude, you are a troll, you make no sense BYE I IGNORE YOU INSTEAD OF DISCUSSING THIS FURTHER BECAUSE IM UNCAPABLE OF".

ill demonstrate. you do not provide valuable facts. i didnt even accuse you of anything even tho your claims sound ridiculous about how to be healthy, ill say when you write this:

Anyhow, you clearly [whats clearly as in a state of fact here?] *and this is not just based on this conversation [im pretty sure it is because this conversation is a support statement to anything else you want to accuse me. so you do double wrong whamy right here.] but with the way you've treated others here as well* can't have a discussion without being rude, so I am done with you now. [where ive treated others here as well ? that has to be the most clueless and unsupportive statement done to me in the past few weeks. well done right here!]


anyway, im sure people who are actually more concentrated on science rather than pseudo ideas like SUPER FOODS AND SUPER HEALTH AND SUPER LONG LIVING AND ETC. will actually care to read what i say in other instances. ;)

Mod note: There is both a multiquote button and an edit button. There is no reason for you to have 3 posts in a row.

-fizzle
 
Last edited by a moderator:
[where ive treated others here as well ? that has to be the most clueless and unsupportive statement done to me in the past few weeks. well done right here!]
Click to expand...
Well you've been treating me like shit for a bout a week so yeah she's spot on about that.

you do not provide valuable facts
Click to expand...
You yourself have yet to provide a single source while I have posted roughly a half dozen in various threads.

Hypocrisy FTW I suppose =D

btw this is your last troll treat(think 'scooby snack' for trolls) so enjoy it because you're going on the ignore list soon. :)
 
delta_9 said:
Well you've been treating me like shit for a bout a week so yeah she's spot on about that.

You yourself have yet to provide a single source while I have posted roughly a half dozen in various threads.

Hypocrisy FTW I suppose =D

btw this is your last troll treat(think 'scooby snack' for trolls) so enjoy it because you're going on the ignore list soon. :)
Click to expand...


yeh hypocrisy ftw indeed. all your sources have been one sided coin. you are not honest and you never posted anything that looks on both sides of the argument. im not going to be like you and just state one side as well with bunch of urls. i was hoping you are honest but ive lost respect to you ever since to care enough to go to google and waste my valuable time on people like you.

call me a troll once again i might have to use ignore myself and report you for abuse. sick of your name calling. :\


[edit] grammar dont want you to make fun of me for this too calling me a grammatical troll.
 
all your sources have been one sided coins
Click to expand...
How on earth are abstracts and articles from peer reviewed medical, pharmacological, and nutrition journals "one sided coins"?

What do you define as a credible source then? If not the entirety of science then what? I would very much like to know how you go about "proving" things.

sick of your name calling. :\
Click to expand...
The large bulk of the scurrilous comments in this thread have all come from your posts.
 
Last edited:
^ by taking only what the findings considered positive rather than the negative and the unbranched. for example, on phytic acid you kept listing it can help against cancer, but there is not a single article that shows clear evidence IN VIVO in humans to have helped against that.
and you never cared to post phytic acid's ability as antinutrient trying to show only its positive effects and yet its highly binding to minerals can cause anemia and other conditions associated with low mineral absorption. you just said "you do it". like i thot you are going to be honest and post the negatives too...
 
delta9 it is not that we are in court and i have to put my point across and convince jurors and you do the same. i was hoping i can inspire you to look up both good and bad and for your own good consider them. then you post them and you create discussion among others hopefuly. you really think i come here to just argue by posting one point of view ? i enjoy encouraging people doing it themselves. i feel like im being pretty cool completely opposite of what you and very few others here consider me. :/
 
Well yes, of course we're not in a court. This is not a trial and if I'm right or you're right at the end of the day neither of us is going to jail (I hope ;)).

And yes, I have seen a few posts of your that were quite civil, I made note of this earlier, however as I said the bulk of your posting in this specific thread(and 1 or 2 others I can think of) have been quite rude. At least that is how it appears to me. Perhaps that was not your intention but I do not think you can honestly say you don't understand how it would appear that way to others.

In any event, can we please agree to disagree? :) I'd rather not make the HL Mods' jobs even more difficult than it probably is.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top