yardbirdrc
Bluelighter
- Joined
- Jan 8, 2011
- Messages
- 160
Then they should probably act that way.The main goal of this group is harm reduction by helping people identify misrepresented substances, not talking down on RC's.
Yeah come to think of it, I have no idea either. They said they drew that conclusion from tests at some particular festival, though I don't have the quote handy at the moment. Then at the end of the big long paragraph about how they weren't LSD they had this sentence about how all of what they just said was "unconfirmed". If you're testing the blotters, how is it unconfirmed? If you didn't test any blotters that had 25x-NBOMe on them, then why even bring it up? And they never followed up on it with any real information after that, so what was that all about?As for the Alex Grey's being 25i-nbome, i dont know how they came to that conclusion, maybe they were just assuming since there is 25c and 25i NBOMe, aswell as DOI and DOC being sold on blotter by RC vendors, but they are being sold as such. Ofcourse anyone can than go ahead and sell it as acid. But yeh, not sure why they assumed 25i for the Alex Greys.
Does anybody know how they test the stuff? Marquis/Mecke/Simons for the pills and Erlich for the blotters? They posted another article about confirmed DOB at a recent festival. How can they confirm anything with such specificity? Can you even detect specific test results for 25I or DOB with those reagents alone?