codename99
Greenlighter
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2012
- Messages
- 1
First i must say stay away from ethylphenidate. it's a killer Seven fatality's from Ethylphenidate.Isopropylpropylphenidate will definitely have less risk of compulsive dosing and hence stimulant psychosis....
But i still largely prefer 4f-mph... 4f-eph is the best phemidate though imo.... more euphoric than eph but extremely dangerously addictive.
In my experience all phenidates are candidates for compulsive redosing.
I recently went through 10 grams in 3 weeks of (±)-threo-4F-MPH hydrochloride and.
I can say it upped my metabolism last 30 pounds and and gave me significantly better focus than MPH. Hence a significant rise in my GPA

Which I am prescribed 80mg a day. hence a significant rise in my GPA

I do have access to a university chemistry lab and test equipment i.e. LC-MS and HR-MS mass spectrometer's so that how i verified what i had,
Though thankfully I have yet to get a batch with even though it would be a case of sloppy synthesis (±)-threo and (±)-erythro-4F-MPH,
it would be interesting to see what effects that would have since
(±)-threo/(±)-erythro mixture, is active at dopamine transporters (DAT), norepinephrine
transporters (NET) and serotonin transporters (SERT), respectively where as (±)-threo-4F-MPH hydrochloride has no SERT effects as far as I know.
\
(±)-threo-4F-MPH did not show any appreciable binding affinity at SERT (IC50 > 10 μM, [3 H]citalopram). Furthermore, (±)-threo-4F-MPH was shown to be about three times more potent than MPH in a drug discrimination assay.[50] Overall, it appears that the acetate group and the piperidine ring must be oriented in the opposite direction..
see 4-fluoromethylphenidate (4F-MPH) and differentiation between the (±)-threo and (±)-erythro diastereomers