tathra
bluelighter
Trump wants a war partly because its traditionally the easiest way to ensure re-election (to keep power) until he figures out how to do a Reichstag Fire
Would you say Vietnam was justified?
I'd be deeply concerned that a Korea Part II would ramp up into a broader and more fiery conflict.
Personally, I'm not sure its up to the US to intervene in regional disputes. Track record isn't great.![]()
Trump wants a war partly because its traditionally the easiest way to ensure re-election (to keep power) until he figures out how to do a Reichstag Fire
25th amendment, section 4
Whenever the Vice President and a majority of either the principal officers of the executive departments or of such other body as Congress may by law provide, transmit to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives their written declaration that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, the Vice President shall immediately assume the powers and duties of the office as Acting President.
china is supporting n.korea and we're supporting s.korea. and yes, we're far too big for n.korea to win in a fight against us, but i'm pretty sure getting into a fight with n.korea means getting into a fight with china, and china would win against us on sheer numbers. and n.korea could do a shitton of damage against us, especially knowing that they wont come out of the fight alive. cornered animals are fucking vicious. its just not worth it.
Stabilizing, motorizing, and reorganizing!!!!!!!!!!!!!Again, stabilizing
China got a lot of peepsChina will fuck NKorea's shit up six ways till sunday.
But then I'm pretty drunk right now, so maybe thats all wrong.........(but China still kicks ass cause they got so many people)
(my emphasis)With his latest tweet, clearly implying that a United States senator would trade sexual favors for campaign cash, President Trump has shown he is not fit for office. Rock bottom is no impediment for a president who can always find room for a new low.
White House spokeswoman Sarah Huckabee Sanders on Tuesday dismissed the president's smear as a misunderstanding because he used similar language about men. Of course, words used about men and women are different. When candidate Trump said a journalist was bleeding from her "wherever," he didn't mean her nose.
And as is the case with all of Trump's digital provocations, the president's words were deliberate. He pours the gasoline of sexist language and lights the match gleefully knowing how it will burst into flame in a country reeling from the #MeToo moment.
A president who would all but call Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand a whore is not fit to clean the toilets in the Barack Obama Presidential Library or to shine the shoes of George W. Bush.
This isn’t about the policy differences we have with all presidents or our disappointment in some of their decisions. Obama and Bush both failed in many ways. They broke promises and told untruths, but the basic decency of each man was never in doubt.
Donald Trump, the man, on the other hand, is uniquely awful. His sickening behavior is corrosive to the enterprise of a shared governance based on common values and the consent of the governed.
It should surprise no one how low he went with Gillibrand. When accused during the campaign of sexually harassing or molesting women in the past, Trump’s response was to belittle the looks of his accusers. Last October, Trump suggested that he never would have groped Jessica Leeds on an airplane decades ago: “Believe me, she would not be my first choice, that I can tell you.” Trump mocked another accuser, former People reporter Natasha Stoynoff, “Check out her Facebook, you’ll understand.” Other celebrities and politicians have denied accusations, but none has stooped as low as suggesting that their accusers weren’t attractive enough to be honored with their gropes.
If recent history is any guide, the unique awfulness of the Trump era in U.S. politics is only going to get worse. Trump’s utter lack of morality, ethics and simple humanity has been underscored during his 11 months in office.
...
The nation doesn’t seek nor expect perfect presidents, and some have certainly been deeply flawed. But a president who shows such disrespect for the truth, for ethics, for the basic duties of the job and for decency toward others fails at the very essence of what has always made America great.
did anybody see the usa today editorial on trump?
obviously there are people - some here - for whom trump can do no wrong. this isn't an anti-trump 'fake news' attack from the liberal msm. this is an editorial opinion from a populist paper which has, for years, steered clear of picking political sides. it's telling that the board feels compelled to issue such a scathing rebuke:
Will Trump's lows ever hit rock bottom?
(my emphasis)
indeed.
there's no doubt that independent voters played a big role in electing trump in 2016. obviously it depends on whose numbers you choose to believe but a quick, random sample suggests that independents swung to trump about 42% to 48% compared to clinton.
in recent polls. independents are abandoning him:
TRUMP’S APPROVAL RATING HITS RECORD LOW IN YET ANOTHER POLL, AS HIS POPULARITY PLUMMETS AMONG INDEPENDENT WOMEN
Trump Losing the Supporters He Needs Most: Independents
Trump's approval rating has fallen in every single state since he became President
draw your own conclusions.
alasdair
another liberal rag
"Doesn't agree with my bias" != biased
If you're thinking this is just more criticism from another liberal editorial board, you would be wrong. As the unofficial newspaper of U.S. travelers, USA Today strives for political neutrality, even on its opinion page. It has never endorsed a presidential candidate.