• BASIC DRUG
    DISCUSSION
    Welcome to Bluelight!
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
    Benzo Chart Opioids Chart
    Drug Terms Need Help??
    Drugs 101 Brain & Addiction
    Tired of your habit? Struggling to cope?
    Want to regain control or get sober?
    Visit our Recovery Support Forums
  • BDD Moderators: Keif’ Richards

BDD Social/Information Booth - (MK. VI) - get some sleep, kids!

Bah...either way...I knew I wasn't STILL paranoid from all the speed I used to do...
 
It's true, Lou, Mugz is a proper sleaze. You're best off staying away.
 
Alrighty then... Thanks again for the warning, effie. Who knows what he's capable of ;)
 
Especially when he's wielding his modstick 8o

Hehe how are you today Loulou?
 
Am fine, thanks. Slept well, at least (with the aid of downers, though). And you?
 
Lol. But I always wanted to be a girl, that's why I'm playing with my name here.
 
loulou reed said:
Am fine, thanks. Slept well, at least (with the aid of downers, though). And you?
Click to expand...

Same, slept with a little help from some diaz. Overall, I'm good though thank you - been feeling quite a bit better the past few days. Got some train travel to do later today, I really should be packing but I can't stay away from you guys.. ;)

Mugz said:
I'm capable of many things, including inter-dimensional travel and on rare occasions time travel too 8)
Click to expand...

Surely time is just another dimension too? ;)

edit: Morning Vader! :)
 
Oh ya...I meant to add these for the sexiness contest...so here's my entries...I got this shit in the bag :P

NSFW:
Photo0042.jpg


Photo0043.jpg


You KNOW it's sexy :P
 
Vader said:
Let's not get into that messy business...
"Morning" effie!
Click to expand...

Haha. It's morning til I get out of bed and get my fucking coffee, okay? ;)

You're probably right about the time thing. I'm barely awake, that might explode my brain.

Doug2113 said:
Oh ya...I meant to add these for the sexiness contest...so here's my entries...I got this shit in the bag :P

NSFW:
Photo0042.jpg


Photo0043.jpg


You KNOW it's sexy :P
Click to expand...

Haha jesus Doug, NOT what I want to see at this time of the morning! Afternoon, whatever :p
 
You're probably right about the time thing. I'm barely awake, that might explode my brain.
Click to expand...
According to The 4D View, temporally extended objects have temporal parts, temporal extension is perfectly analogous to spatial extension, and time is one of four dimensions that are on a par, at least with respect to the manner in which objects are spread out in space-time. On The 3D View, however, temporally extended objects do not have temporal parts, temporal extension is very different from spatial extension, and time is unique among the four dimensions of the world, at least with respect to the manner in which objects are spread out in space-time.

On The 4D View, objects are to be thought of as four-dimensional “space-time worms,” each of which is made up of many different temporal parts, like the different spatial segments of an earthworm. An object at a time — Descartes in 1625, for example — is not the whole object but, rather, a mere part (a temporal part) of that object; and the relation between Descartes in 1625 and Descartes in 1635 is like the relation between the two wheels of a bicycle: they are different parts of a bigger whole. By contrast, on The 3D View, objects are to be thought of as three-dimensional things that are not made up of different temporal parts. On this view, an object at a time — Descartes in 1625, for example — is the same thing as the whole object — Descartes. Thus, according to The 3D View, the relation between Descartes in 1625 and Descartes in 1635 is the relation of identity: each one is just the same thing as Descartes.
Click to expand...
Ave summa that!
 
Haha nice, Vader. Love a bit of science before I've got out of bed. I like the 4D view.

Doug, I'm a mod, I have to check what people are posting even if it's NSFW! Thanks for putting me off my breakfast ;)
 
Me too, but there's a part of me that worries that it's "macrotyping" (the kind of "everything is the same" thinking that glosses over significant differences). I can move easily in two dimensions, and with a bit of effort in a third one, but if time is the fourth dimension, it seems that we are just uncontrollably plummeting through it, which is kind of odd. There's also the worry that, if we are 4D-spacetime-worms, the 3D thing that I see when I look at you isn't the same 3D thing I saw 5 minute ago, and that in fact the object that I term "you" is in a constant state of flux.
I think it also has some interesting consequences for the way we understand perception. I can represent a 3D object on a 2D plane, but it isn't really 3D. So, maybe, there's a rule here, that you have to be one dimension "higher" than the one you're perceiving, and that the fact we're experiencing 3 dimensions must mean we're existing in a fourth. Pretty spurious, I am sure I used to have more convincing ways of stating this but they've escaped me.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top