Bella Figura
Bluelight Crew
Meph isn't fiendish in any way. You can take a dose and stick to it for the night. Its not really that comparable to MDMA either, its not THAT empathogenic.
Meph isn't fiendish in any way.
Nonsense. Human reactions to drugs will vary, but that level of variance is absurd outside of tolerant individuals. Like most distributions of biological variables, there will be a minority of persons on either end of the dosing curve. The vast, vast majority will be in the middle. It's that predictability that permits dosing advice.Can I just point out that doses are very subjective quantities. One persons 100 mg is another ones 500 mg etc.
*shrug*So lets not been so judgemental. There are idiots out there but the vast majority have a good idea of there own personal limits.
it definitely is "fiendish". it's not like tear your house apart looking for that lost half gram style,
Nonsense. Human reactions to drugs will vary, but that level of variance is absurd outside of tolerant individuals. Like most distributions of biological variables, there will be a minority of persons on either end of the dosing curve. The vast, vast majority will be in the middle. It's that predictability that permits dosing advice.
A personal limit is simply a term that people use to describe a dose that they can handle without either dying or experiencing negative physical/mental health effects during the experience. In other words, it doesn't have any relationship to the actual safety of their behaviour.
Are you generally a fiend with drugs?
Actually I think your talking nonsense. If you look at the sample of the group of people who use this site then they are, invariably, experienced users with high tolerences. So you could expect a far higher varience than in a genuine random sample.
If you don't have any short term health effects and don't end up in hospital then you are inside your own personal limit and you are safe.
What are you basing that on?a small amount of meph is not going to do that much harm just like if you have 4 or 5 pts of lager or you have 16+ pts.
Actually I think your talking nonsense...
So in your original statement, the "one person" who considers a dose of 100mg as being qualitatively similar as "another person" on 500mg... is one or both of these people "experienced users"?Actually I think your talking nonsense. If you look at the sample of the group of people who use this site then they are, invariably, experienced users with high tolerences. So you could expect a far higher varience than in a genuine random sample.
I don't even know where to start with that one. I really don't. To be honest, I don't really feel like I need to rebut the argument. It kinda speaks for itself. It's a bit disheartening that any user of this website would take such an approach.I agree with your definition of a 'personal limit' but disagree with your idea that this bares no relationship between actual safely. If you don't have any short term health effects and don't end up in hospital then you are inside your own personal limit and you are safe.
What the fuck are you talking about? Who mentioned Parkinsons? Who's scaremongering?If you end up with Parkinson's 20 years early because you meddled with RCs then that is a risk and everyone should be aware of. Scaremongering, however, is very tabloid indeed. Drug taking always has associated risks, short and long term but you don't need to brand people as 'fucking idiots' because they fall into your narrow definition of 'hammering a substance'.
Please shut up.Different people have different levels of hammering and many variables contribute to that - so lay off the headlines.
It's rich to see someone who took E 3 times a week giving lectures to folk who are doing drugs too often. Most successful financial years? What were you doing, selling them?