• 🇬🇧󠁿 🇸🇪 🇿🇦 🇮🇪 🇬🇭 🇩🇪 🇪🇺
    European & African
    Drug Discussion


    Welcome Guest!
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
  • EADD Moderators: Shambles

Russel Brand... your thoughts?



Wow.

I'm not an expert on such things but clearly a rented chauffeur-driven vehicle (that 'brand new car' luster is the give-away) and just look at the single man 'close security detail'! Not a group of totally unmemorable people in well tailorered suits but crucially cut so PDWs may be concealed, but ONE geezer in a tight leather jacket and what I suspect is a dead rat on his head.

I would love someone to ID that geezer as one he's totally at odds with the image Brand was attempting to radiate but he clearly has no experience. One is not a detail and the only way one can work is if that officer has a ranged weapons (gun).

So in essence Brand made himself LOOK like a criminal who is trying but failing to appear a professional of some sort.

I bet anyone who will take it £1 that the security geezer is an ex-boxer or something of that ilk. He certainly isn't a licenced SIA member as they are legally required to wear ID.

Apparently the 'rat pack' of journalisst who end up filming Brand's frequent court appearences are still puzzling out who the guy is.

Any ideas?

FYI he doesn't turn up in the USA so he is likely British. Hope it's not a BLer ;-)
 
Last edited:
Update - the bouncer IS an ex-boxer! Specifically a 'friend' of Tyson Fury (ex boxer) and so is almost certainly part of Britian's traveller community.

In retrospect, people who grew up in or entered that community would have good reason not to be photographed. Close ups of the guys neck tattoos are clearly a 'cover up'.
 


Russell brand clumsily getting out the back of a hired Mercades people-carrier; eventually. Only two people in the back yet he used a people-carrier?

Having hired a LOT of vehicles in my time, I know when someone has been offered 'a cheap deal' when I see it.

Same one-man security detail who is clearly an idiot as he repeatedly leans into the vehicle to ask Brand exactly what to do for NINTY SECONDS thus NOT looking for potential attack vectors. While the rat on his head has got a bit fatter, I think it telling that he's wearing that same tight (and very tasteless) faux-leather jacket. You know the one.

Then we clearly see there are six uniformed police officers and a couple of security guard of the court, so it's self-evident that faux-rathead is just a motley.

I asked someone about RBs 'burn rate' i.e. how much money he's chucking about to APPEAR the success he isn't. Shades of the Tates, methinks. It seems he goes to great lengths to avoid his name being on bills but the bloke with the rodent on his bonce likely hired the vehicles (for example) and he's employed by someone else so on paper the known outgoings are all to shell companies.

But the burn-rate is clearly hurting.

When he turned up hosting the semi-final of some obscure US boxing league, that tells us he will do anything that pays... as long as his viewers don't get to learn of it.

I tell you what, how quickly things change. A 2023 article in The Guardian claimed he had 500,000 viewers on his Monday to Friday one hour 'Aren't I great' Rumble channel but as I noted after checking, they only get 35,000-45,000 views in total, not the 500,000 of two plus years ago.

It's wisdom taught to me by my grandparents that you cut your clothing to your cloth. But Brand if anything is going the other way.

To me, this all smells of desperation.

He doesn't need any security as the only people who turn up to his court appearences are the press, apart from that one bloke on the other side of the street who clearly just stopped to see what was occuring. Everyone else is seen just walking past totally disintereted. But he feels the need to project the sense that he IS in physical danger BUT it's sad because he clearly cannot afford a professional security detail so it all ends up looking EXACTLY like a disgraced ex-TV personality who thinks if he just stays calm and looks hard, the jury will take a gander and remark how nobody that much like a rapist could possibly BE a rapist.

With my home-made psychiatrist's hat on, it demonstrates that Brand is a narcissist and a psychopath. He feels the constant need to project an image BUT he doesn't have the intelligence to understand basic things like the permanence of objects. I bet he thinks nobody has noticed what a sad display he in fact makes of himself because he THINKS he's more intelligant than EVERYONE else.

Any competent KC would tell him NOT to look in any way threatening. Things like smiling and waving so people see him as a normal person who by pure bad luck to have been targetted by someone who must have a personal grievence. Not to look like an East End villian who knows they are on their way to a long stretch in chokey. But that's a narccicist for you. They need to feel superior.

He's going down.

I'm going to guess 10-12 because like the rest of us, I don't have access to all of the evidence but this wasn't a one-off. The police advised the CPS to focus on the charges between 1999-2009 in spite of futher claims made in 2013. Now when a police force essentially asks only for specimen charges, that generally means they feel their is sufficient evidence so the cost of adding the charges made in 2013 won't materially alter the outcome.
 
Last edited:
OK.

Right now I'm wondering how long hamsters live for.

In 'The Young Ones' Vyvyan Basterd has a pet hamster called 'Special Patrol Group' and maybe we stumbled upon yet another star destroyed by drink and drugs and reduced to demeaning stereotype roles.

The Brian Harvey of the 80s BBC2 sitcom world, if you will.


Oh, and rapey Russell as well...

Sorry for the OT.
 
@F.U.B.A.R. - Great minds and all that...

But I find it almost impossible that his defence council wouldn't at least hint that projecting an air of menace is probably NOT la mode du jour.

I actually spent the time to look footage of other men facing similar charges and you know what? Every single one of them was smiling and ideally was accompined by a woman (where duress wasn't involved). Sure, they all got sent down but to me what he is in fact doing is setting up an image he fondly imagines will serve him best for his spell at HMP.

That's why I concluded desperation.

He will go under the numbers before they even turn the key.

BUT I would wager £1 that ratfink got the job because he at least says he can somehow provide protection for rapeman during his term. Which of course is why who he is has been so closely guarded. But ironically his wealth will tick boxes to class him as a 'high risk inmate' so the only question is Belmarsh or Wandsworth? I think the latter.
 
No, no no.

Pope Leo XIV was in fact a 16'3 bay gelding called 'Proton' (but keep it on the QT, it's a secret).
 
Always a pleassure to see the jesus card being played when it ends catastrophic failure. Not surprised noone bought into his crap, this guy wouldn't be able to sell smack at a rehab clinic even.
 
Rapey Russell's ego means he cannot even imagine anyone not falling under his spell. The UK being the LEAST religious nation on the planet means while he may fool some people in the USA, he's only fooling HIMSELF if he thinks a British jury would even consider that particular lie. We tend to just ASSUME a rich successful person who 'finds god' is lying.

I bet his 'awakening wonders' DO believe him so reflect his lies - so ironically, the USA is probably the very WORST place to go if your mission is to practice lying in a British Crown Court.

Unlike the US, the jury of 8 men and 4 women can only be asked to 'stand down' on 'proven bias' based on interviews only the judge has access to. I suppose asking 'have you or a close friend been the victim of sexual assault?' would be the obvious one BUT believe it or not, most judges are no longer the stereotypes as described in works like 'Rumpole of the Bailey' so will know MOST women have been or know someone who has been a victim but may still be perfectly capable of basing their verdict purely on the evidence.

By the time the prosecution has laid out all of the evidence, we will pretty much KNOW.

My feeling is RR is losing control, possibly for the first time in his life. I mean EXTERNAL control is a novel threat to him.

I know it may sound like a small detail but often when a person grows a beard and grows their hair, they think it's a form of 'natural disguise' when a jury sees it, it may be an internal bias to ask why someone innocent of such serious crimes wouldn't at least appear smart.

“When you are dealing with official minds if you can't be humble, then at least be clean.”
-John Le Carre (Our Game)
 
fabian society cock. predatory narcissistic sociopath cuntrag.
fuck him up his stupid waffling ass.

gone carnivore or paleo now too. how conscious


utter schill led opposition motherfucker. phoney
 
Well, at the moment the prosecution are questioning victims and it seems Rapey Russell's defence team is reduced to trying to catch out witnesses , trying to show the jury that if they misremember a tiny detail of their statements, they may have mistaken agreeing...

But once anal rape is specified as one of the details, I don't think the defence will have much luck. They KNOW if they try to push a victim too hard, the jury WILL note the fact and of course the Judge WILL intervene.

A defendent may have many forms of 'special defence' from mistaken identity to someone else having borrowed their belongings even to drugs or mental health mitigating judgement.

But it's Rapey Russell the narciccist so he cannot use ANY defence that doesn't centre on his newly forged persona. I conclude he's a psychopatch who in his mind thinks his own statements/cross-examination will allow him to spin his web of lies.

I TRULY think that is the entirety of his defence.
 
Well, at the moment the prosecution are questioning victims and it seems Rapey Russell's defence team is reduced to trying to catch out witnesses , trying to show the jury that if they misremember a tiny detail of their statements, they may have mistaken agreeing...

But once anal rape is specified as one of the details, I don't think the defence will have much luck. They KNOW if they try to push a victim too hard, the jury WILL note the fact and of course the Judge WILL intervene.

A defendent may have many forms of 'special defence' from mistaken identity to someone else having borrowed their belongings even to drugs or mental health mitigating judgement.

But it's Rapey Russell the narciccist so he cannot use ANY defence that doesn't centre on his newly forged persona. I conclude he's a psychopatch who in his mind thinks his own statements/cross-examination will allow him to spin his web of lies.

I TRULY think that is the entirety of his defence.
I don’t know if I would label him as someone with ASPD. It is a spectrum and whilst bad there are a lot worse people who are diagnosed with NPD.

You only hear the horrible things about people with ASPD, the “psychopaths” that have killed and don’t care but it’s not the majority of people with the condition. You probably know lots of people with ASPD, the successful ceos, managers etc mask very well.
 
Top