• ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง๓ ฟ ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ช ๐Ÿ‡ฟ๐Ÿ‡ฆ ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ช ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ญ ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡บ
    European & African
    Drug Discussion


    Welcome Guest!
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
  • EADD Moderators: Shambles

๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ Social ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ Gibberings ver. CCXIX - "what's new, c*nty chops?"

I'm pretty sure most of us UK members are old enough to remember the days of sixteen year old page three girls. Aye?
Not that I doubted you BB, but even so that sentence seemed so unbelievable that I had to verify it. And verification came back loud and clear, that indeed it was a thing, presumably right from when they started 'the feature' in 1969, possibly right up to January 2015, when the topless pictures ended due to widespread pressure from many quarters, MPs, through to women's Activism groups. Although I wouldn't be surprised if the 16 year olds were 'phased out' at some point before that.

Obviously today, if you still owned any of those newspapers, or found online versions to download, AFAIK you'd be wide open to being charged for possessing child pornography.

Even though I've seen confirmation, I still find it incredible that the Sun used 16 year old girls as their topless page 3 models, until an unknown date, when this practice ended.

I assume that it must have been before 2015, as laws regarding such material on the internet were rapidly catching up and growing teeth in that decade! Maybe even in the noughties, I;m not sure exactly 'when everything changed' in a very extreme total turn around, kind of way.
 
Yeah. Up until early naughties. 2003 I think.

And folk don't believe stuff like noncing was more accepted back then. Fuck.
The Sun was massively hypocritical and riddled with double standards. I shouldn't be surprised really.

At the same time as featuring topless 16 year olds on their page 3, and sexualsing 16 year olds more broadly, Charlotte Church for example, (we've already seen that there was sexualised articles and photos about her getting published when she was just 15. I'm sure there'd be loads more examples. The Brooke Shields rabbit hole is not one I wish to go down, but I'm sure there'd be loads of examples regarding her.) there'd be sensationalist front page articles covering the various high profile pdfs of the time getting sent to prison for their crimes. IIRC there was a lot of sexy photos of the 14 year old Mandy Smith (Bill Wyman's "girl friend". I'd have been about the same age as her at the time, so I don't think there's anything amiss with me mentioning that in such terms.
 
The Sun was massively hypocritical and riddled with double standards. I shouldn't be surprised really.

At the same time as featuring topless 16 year olds on their page 3, and sexualsing 16 year olds more broadly, Charlotte Church for example, (we've already seen that there was sexualised articles and photos about her getting published when she was just 15. I'm sure there'd be loads more examples. The Brooke Shields rabbit hole is not one I wish to go down, but I'm sure there'd be loads of examples regarding her.) there'd be sensationalist front page articles covering the various high profile pdfs of the time getting sent to prison for their crimes. IIRC there was a lot of sexy photos of the 14 year old Mandy Smith (Bill Wyman's "girl friend". I'd have been about the same age as her at the time, so I don't think there's anything amiss with me mentioning that in such terms.
Nothing whatsoever amiss in mentioning it mate, whatever age you are. It happened, so it can be discussed. End of. Don't stress it.

We're all so afraid of offending / breaking the 'rules' that any and all communication is getting progressively (sic) more difficult by the day. Boils my piss tbh. Especially as the goalposts shift every few months "Ooooh you can't say that now" Aaaagh.

Beam me up Scottie! (If that is still ok to say?)
 
e6328c9f-3535-4726-ba4a-17fad90c1f82-721x706.jpg
The most controversial Brass Eye - complete with ad breakOriginal transmission - unedited.
 
I'm pretty sure most of us UK members are old enough to remember the days of sixteen year old page three girls. Aye?
100% yes.
I was going to post it but I was beaten to the task, several papers like Daily Sport & The Sun would have a count down to a girl being 16 & on her birthday they would put out a photo of her with her boobs out as you have to be 16 to show it.

These days if you did that a bunch of skinhead Lesbian freaks & goddamn Communist nutcases would be shouting you are a Nazi & be selling issues of The Socialist Worker.

Such a good thing I never knew about smoking very clean MDPV back then in the mid 1990's when all this was quite common.
 
The best episode of Brass Eye. All are essential though.

The fact that they printed that about fifteen year old Charlotte Church next to foaming at the mouth over Brass Eye says it all about the British tabloids.
 
Nothing whatsoever amiss in mentioning it mate, whatever age you are. It happened, so it can be discussed. End of. Don't stress it.

We're all so afraid of offending / breaking the 'rules' that any and all communication is getting progressively (sic) more difficult by the day. Boils my piss tbh. Especially as the goalposts shift every few months "Ooooh you can't say that now" Aaaagh.

Beam me up Scottie! (If that is still ok to say?)

I had a memory wank over my teenage girlfriend's tits.

I promptly handed myself in to the constabulary.
 
The age was raised from 16 to 18 in 2003, and only because of the Sexual Offences Act of that year.
can't believe it was so late!

Beam me up Scottie! (If that is still ok to say?)
surely that's now racist to the scots?!

The best episode of Brass Eye.
I never watched it at the time but saw a couple on youtube last month, bloody funny! I need to go and find some more to watch.
 
The best episode of Brass Eye. All are essential though.

The fact that they printed that about fifteen year old Charlotte Church next to foaming at the mouth over Brass Eye says it all about the British tabloids.
Either the reporter and editor of that Brass Eye article were too stupid to realise that that particular episode of Brass Eye was a satirical piss take of the way television stations and news broadcasts were hysterically reporting on pedophilia issues at the time, or they didn't think their readers would understand, and just tried to stir up outrage, and completely missed the point., whatever the case.

The show was not "sick", it was merely reflecting the state of TV news and documentaries at the time, in a highly satirical way.
 
Top