Las Veghost grower
Bluelighter
I haven’t seen any disproving…just opinions…
reread the data.IF I'VE MISINTERPRETED THE DATA, THEN PROVE IT. What is the "real" story behind the data walk through? WHAT DID I MISINTERPRET?
Did you know there actually a lot of cold cases that have been solved by internet sleuths , I watched a whole episode on it the other day, pretty impressiveIt's pretty crazy that a video which completely blows open the "CONSPIRACY" about covid vaccines is on youtube :O
wow!!
it's like people are playing internet facebook detective![]()
yeah, or, at least the body foundDid you know there actually a lot of cold cases that have been solved by internet sleuths , I watched a whole episode on it the other day, pretty impressive
Yea I think it was Luca magnota or something ? That dude is legitimately fucked in the head, just listening to him talk you can tell there some screws looseyeah, or, at least the body found
I love that side of youtube. I love cold cases. I love internet sleuths. Not dissing them entirely.
Ever seen the documentary "Don't FUCK with cats" ? (pretty fucked up but got documentary about internet finding a killer/animal torturer)
this is the worst analogy i've ever seen attempted. this is just not how pre clinical and clinical trials work. ever.Ive worked inside deadlines that required magic to meet so I used the Illusion of it being done which requires me to speak with confidence and hope the flaws are not noticed. I am watching the whole scientific community act exactly like I do when I know the wedding cake looks perfect but there is a crack inside below the icing that may turn this into a $2000 refund and the worst experience of this new couples life.
Las Veghost grower said:If the virus had even a 20% mortality rate I might get the vaccine
Yep because I am overall healthy and I have no clue how the vaccine will effect me in the long runSo you might take a chance with something that has a one in a million chance of killing you, if it protects you from a virus that has a one in five chance of killing you?
Yes but at the same time scientist are human and make mistakes too, that’s why it’s always changing. My motto is never trust someone trying to sell you something, even though it’s our tax money paying for it I think that still applies…If the virus had even a 20% mortality rate I might get the vaccine, but the risk is so low to begin with I don’t want to start pushing my odds with the vaccine too…
Orders of magnitude or fractions of a percent in your overall chance of survival ?poor analogy, particularly painful in light of my above 'worst analogy i have ever seen' post above, but i come from Polish blood and we lost 20% of our population in WW2.
your tax money paid to fight against that. your people paid for that with their lives (assuming, given your quotes elsewhere about owning a gun, that you are from the US). do you have any idea what it is like to see 20% of your blood die? i'm talking a full 20% so assuming a 100% transmission rate to make the analogy vaguely acceptable but people fighting on your side are arguing that's already happened or close to occurring.
your quote is truly spoken like someone who doesn't have a large proportion of their brethren dying within their families living memory and doesn't really comprehend what it takes to fight against that.
anyway. i'm too close to godwins law so i'll leave it at that.
scientists do make mistakes, but for some things the evidence is overwhelming.
when you say slightly higher than the vaccine, you mean orders of magnitude.
what is your evidence that the long term effects of the vaccine are worse than those of contracting covid? what biological mechanisms do you propose to govern this?
orders of magnitude and fractions of a percent are the same thing.Orders of magnitude or fractions of a percent in your overall survival ?
you can word it however you like, it dosent increase your chance of survival by a whole lot, not enough to justify taking some new cocktail with no long term safety dataorders of magnitude and fractions of a percent are the same thing.
if you don't understand that, and given you asked its a fair assumption, then you need to get some classes before we can continue this conversation.
you were the one that asked re wording, not me. so why ask?you can word it however you like, it dosent increase your chance of survival by a whole lot, not enough to justify taking some new cocktail with no long term safety data
Insult (...you don't understand me, you can use your fancy words)you can word it however you like
Ignore (...reading from your own sheet of data, ignoring science or the official opinion)it dosent increase your chance of survival by a whole lot
Divert (...the real problem is the CONSPIRACY and magnifying any DOUBT there is in this vaccine)not enough to justify taking some new cocktail with no long term safety data
Then why do they even bother doing trials to begin with ? Just mix it n sell cause for all we know it makes us immortal right ?you were the one that asked re wording, not me. so why ask?
what is your proposed biological mechanism by which any one of the covid vaccines could have an impact in the long term? for your stance to have any meaning, you need to propose one. otherwise the covid vaccines could be making us immortal, since we have no long term data.
and please do not propose reverse transcription because i'm bored of that attempt and can't be bothered to explain even one of the many levels its wrong on for the time being/maybe ever again.