If you saw some of the stuff I just saw during a 60 second look at the "Teens" category on Pornhub, I am sure you'd agree that this stuff is vile.
I must admit I did not watch any of the videos - just looked at some promo pics and captions. Some of the material appeared to be about girls who looked around 16 being "willingly sexually active" - albeit whilst in their school uniforms, with hair in pig tails etc. In other words, infantilisation was critical.
But even more disturbingly, in the "Exxxxtra Tiny Teen" subsection, there were many images of girls who (whatever their real age) were clearly meant to pass as 12 or even younger. Again, I didn't actually watch any of the clips, but from the promos I gathered there were two main themes:
- little girls being raped or at least unwillingly "initiated" - eg "She is Not Used to Suck a Dick" (sic, see OP), in which no male faces were visible, just massive penises, or -
- little girls cheerfully consenting to sex in "suburban house" settings. In these the men's faces and bodies (clothed) were shown - in order, I felt, to characterise them as "Daddies".
I am not exaggerating.
I get what you are saying about age of consent and yes, tis true that many girls aged 16 - or even younger - are psychologically ready for sex. Some may even be interested in much older men ...
That cuts boths way of course. When I was 36 I was giving private English tuition to a 16 y/o boy who persistently played footsies with me under the table and other flirtatious stuff ... to what extent he meant it, I don't know. It was indeed embarrassing because he looked like he was in his early 20s, and I couldn't help but feel a flicker of response (I certainly blushed!)
But surely, when the age difference is so pronounced, and when the kid so obviously doesn't know what the fuck they're really doing .,.. the general rule for the much older person should be "absolutely not, hands off"?
Even if I'd been 26, not 36, it still would've been totally inappropriate to take advantage of this child. A 16 year old is a child, even if legally capable of consent. It would be different with another 16 year old, or an 18 year old ...
It's a contentious area, of course. I have a feeling that the Pornhub issue aside (and I'm sure everyone who saw what I saw would concur that such "fake" kiddy porn is reprehensible) - that aside, there's a question or principle here that needs formulating, or clarifiying ...
Right now the best I can do is to refer to the popular catchphrase "barely legal". IMO, for a big grown up person to have sex with someone who is "barely legal" may be legal, but it still seems wrong.