Captain.Heroin
Bluelight Crew
the "spectrum" can start at a zero/nihil value.
TY Captain.Heroin, I'll admit to feeling slightly butthurt at not being able to post my rebuttal.
@CFC - I'd say that asexuality would probably lie on a different axis of the spectrum to the homosexuality/heterosexuality axis, so, for example, 0 on the Y or sexuality axis would be asexual, and 100% would be, 100% sexual, whatever that is, and 0 on the X/heterosexuality axis would be the probably asymptotic 100% homosexual, and 100% would be the 100% heterosexual.
No worries, of course, although I wouldn't characterise my own contributions as that exactly, anymore than your own admission that you were waiting for a very obvious reply such as my own.
I would say though that we are already discussing semantics - that seems self evident, since what's up for debate is the definition of what it is to be gay or straight.
If you're not interested in defining exactly what you mean by using these terms, then your position is as unchallengeable as it is meaningless. To clarify further - if you're not able to define what exactly "gay" means in this context ("I know I'm not gay"), or any other, then it's hard to see by what criteria you are evaluating this claim. It's also hard for me to understand why you take such issue with any challenge to this position (not a challenge to your own sexual identity, mind - just a challenge to the idea that it's possible for anyone to be 100% of any given sexual orientation), while being happy to keep repeating it without clarifying your reasoning in any way.
TY Captain.Heroin, I'll admit to feeling slightly butthurt at not being able to post my rebuttal.
@CFC - I'd say that asexuality would probably lie on a different axis of the spectrum to the homosexuality/heterosexuality axis, so, for example, 0 on the Y or sexuality axis would be asexual, and 100% would be, 100% sexual, whatever that is, and 0 on the X/heterosexuality axis would be the probably asymptotic 100% homosexual, and 100% would be the 100% heterosexual.
No worries, of course, although I wouldn't characterise my own contributions as that exactly, anymore than your own admission that you were waiting for a very obvious reply such as my own.
I would say though that we are already discussing semantics - that seems self evident, since what's up for debate is the definition of what it is to be gay or straight.
If you're not interested in defining exactly what you mean by using these terms, then your position is as unchallengeable as it is meaningless. To clarify further - if you're not able to define what exactly "gay" means in this context ("I know I'm not gay"), or any other, then it's hard to see by what criteria you are evaluating this claim. It's also hard for me to understand why you take such issue with any challenge to this position (not a challenge to your own sexual identity, mind - just a challenge to the idea that it's possible for anyone to be 100% of any given sexual orientation), while being happy to keep repeating it without clarifying your reasoning in any way.
I'm still concerned about how good it feels to stick warm meat in my mouth... I need to be consoled.
I still think of straight sex as pretty hot and can enjoy watching/doing it if I am so inclined... DOES THIS MAKE ME GAY
There are obviously black and whites like someone having arms - OR NOT - or having a Y chromosome, OR NOT.
I feel better about sticking meat in my mouth now, thank you.makes you lucky I'd say!
Oh yeah for sure, although on the scale of "potential for polarisation", I would say "chromosomality" is MORE black and white than sexuality...Actually even that can get into some fuzzy areas.
There's genetic conditions where someone can have a Y chromosome, but for it to be damaged in such a way that it doesn't work, leaving the person functionally without it. So are they male or female? It's interesting stuff.
True, probably, although I feel that for human beings the extremes are more theoretical than actual. Although again, I'm not actually sure how anyone is measuring this, so without a clear idea of that, it's hard to say.the "spectrum" can start at a zero/nihil value.
I'm not actually sure how anyone is measuring this
I wouldn't be visibly repulsed if a hot chick tried to hop on me or something , I think I would just dodge her and politely say no thanks.
Likewise with a guy (it's happened )
How about if you were sharing a bed and she put your hand in her crotch?
Hah! Thanks for that. If the the orientation units go from 0-6 then I concede it is indeed possible to be 100% heterosexual or 100% homosexual. Just to keep on nitpicking for the sake of it though, I would say that in actual fact the scale is continuous rather than contiguous, and as such 0% and 100% remain asymptotic with respect to the sexuality equation.
That is bisexuality. If you were heterosexual you would never have had sex with a woman or person of the same sex. I know multiple women who had sex and relationships with women as teens or young adults or early 20s, and in their late 20s or early 30s started dating and having sex with men or people of the opposite sex.Take what you will from my experience.
I'm no troll.
I was with a female sexually in my 20s. I'm now in my late 30s and can only now relate to being a heterosexual.
I shared my experience in my other post because you are unsure if you are gay.
You are what you feel.
You mean this website?Someone in game chat sent me a link and I clicked on it and I was greeted by a animation on a website called meat spinner or near spinners and it’s this mans penis spinning Around in time to music and I couldn’t look away, the background music was called You Spin me round by dead or Alive and I just couldn’t look away, it’s caused me to question my sexuality and just watching it was amazingand now every time the song plays on the radio even at work I can see the image in my head and I get turned on but I am not attracted to men just the spinning penis and it’s weird I feel freaked out and I don’t know what this means.
Are you from Finland? The sauna and booze gave it away. That is a really bizarre 'game' and it sounds like rape or sexual assault, unless both people somehow consent? It is not my sex kink but I am sure some people like this sort of kink or sex?My friend used to play game called "Smeagol" .
How you play it is you go to Sauna, a wooden sauna.
You drink lots of booze, then someone goes under the seats that are made of wooden planks.
Then he sticks finger to someone's ass. I don't remember how it goes from here, but i'm pretty sure the friend who told me about this game is 100% faggot. His girlfriend always whines how he doesn't fuck him and tries to cheat the dude. The girl is ugly as fuck speed addict, so i wouldn't myself even fuck her, but hey - whatever suits you.
Yes, i am from Finland. However i'm pretty sure it's not rape. Also, there's more than two people in it. I don't know about the guys who played it, the one who told me does way too much speed so maybe they were tweaking.Are you from Finland? The sauna and booze gave it away. That is a really bizarre 'game' and it sounds like rape or sexual assault, unless both people somehow consent? It is not my sex kink but I am sure some people like this sort of kink or sex?