If they found evidence of crimes against Trump in the Mueller report then they'd impeach/indict, or that means he walks away from crimes like Clinton did. If you're telling the truth then show me one indictment related to Russia collusion.
But intent is irrelevant here, so why say that? And that would also mean that she was so incompetent that she mishandled some of the most top secret information inside the US government. That automatically should disqualify her from any important position. The truth is that there was intent, but as I mentioned before that was part of the excuse for Comey to commit obstruction of justice and let her walk.
I told you that I knew the Mueller Investigation was a fabricated coup since the beginning. So what's in the report is BS until it's proven. What's proven with Manafort is what I stated above because that's what he was found guilty of. Why would they convict him of stuff a decade ago that he did with Dems if they had evidence of him more recently committing criminal activity with Russians? What you're claiming doesn't match with what actually eventuated.
it's funny how you and many others don't care and/or are unaware of what she did. Because if Trump did any of what Clinton did you would hypocritically be calling for his head (and rightfully so).
Where did I say that? I'm just telling you the facts and you resist them, then you lie. If you held no allegiance to the Dems then you would be more unbiased when assessing their criminal activity which you are not. You think claims of "no intent" absolves someone of mishandling SAP intelligence. The only place you got this idea from is liberal media, so even if you're not a Dem you are still brainwashed by their media which is basically the same.
in one case we have direct and damning evidence and provable obstruction of justice, and the other we have insinuations and conspiracy theories. You're right about the deflection you've just got it reversed.
I thought it was "collusion with Russia"?
ll
I would stop lying if I was you it can be damaging to our psychology.
Look dude.... We've talked about this over and over again and your response is the same thing every time... Lies!! Fake news.... It's in the Mueller report. He clearly obstructed justice on the investigation of whether he colluded or not with Russia. Why does somebody obstruct justice? I'll let you infer from that what you will. That fact along with all the other circumstantial evidence is enough to allow me to say.... I believe he is ALSO guilty of collusion but more importantly the case for obstruction is made.
Mueller already stated from the outset that he was not going to make a determination for indictment but would simply lay out the evidence. It's not as if the evidence is presented and the next day he is stripped of the office. The DOJ stance is not to ever indict a sitting president. That brings us to impeachment.
This is a difficult and tricky process because, of course there are a lot of politics involved. The house is beginning the process as we speak but unfortunately they have to weigh their options because even when the impeachment is passed in the house and the trial is held they would never receive the 2/3 majority vote in the republican controlled senate because republicans wouldn't impeach, even if he "shot somebody on 5th ave"? We'll see.....
Comey stated his reasons for not trying Clinton, they didn't and most importantly.. I don't care. Hillary is not PRESIDENT. She has never been anything but Secretary of State and that was 3yrs ago. Nothing to do with Trump's crimes. While we're on the subject of Comey(registered republican), He has stated that Trump was trying to make him stop the investigation into Flynn(obstruction).
Also you never addressed the fact that Trump was already named a co-conspirator(on court transcripts) in a crime, for which Cohen has already been convicted and if you think the evidence doesn't connect Trump. You're wrong... but unfortunately he's President..... best get out of jail free card ever.
10 other cases for obstruction in the MUELLER REPORT on TRUMP
Trump has committed obstruction... A CRIME....... and for a good reason. Why does someone so blatantly obstruct the investigation into a crime?
The fact is that the SITTING PRESIDENT has committed multiple crimes but you keep deflecting and changing the subject to a secretary of state that hasn't been in office for over 3yrs..
It is unfortunate that this is even a debate because if we didn't have this bipartisan nonsense then there wouldn't even be a question of whether we should impeach..
Which brings me back to my statement.... There was a time in this country when we tried to stand for truth because it was morally right. Now we fall for lies to prove who is more morally righteous in being wrong.... The current president committed obstruction crimes... plain and simple... what anybody else did is irrelevant.... Two wrongs don't make a right and the only wrong that should matter in this debate is the presidents anyways. He and nobody else is morally righteous in committing wrongs(crimes)... especially PRESIDENTS.
With that I'm done.. Not going to waste my time debating someone, that has decided they will never change their mind. It's pointless....
www.nytimes.com
www.pbs.org
