Exactly, the reason marijuana has and needs so much support is because how it was illegal for over half a century. That means the government has a HUGE investment in making it illegal. It takes a tremendous force of momentum to reverse all those years of prohibition, as there are powerful people who benefit from keeping things the way they are. Legalizing brings about huge changes, as we have seen with the states that have legalized medical or recreational use. Even growers have been known to vote against legalization, as they don't want to lose their corner of the market.
With kratom we don't have this problem. We are not reversing decades of prohibition, so we dont need as much support to effect changes. Truly it would be helpful if groups like NORML would lend us a hand here though.
Right.
So what do you think about the possibility that we might be able to stop the DEA from scheduling at least ONE substance, ANY substance (even if it's NOT Kratom) in our lifetimes, and that this COULD POSSIBLY set a precedent for weakening the DEA's seemingly absolute power??
You think maybe we might stop them on SOME issue in our lifetimes and that by the time we are old the DEA won't have as much power as they do now and that the war on drugs won't be QUITE AS "successful" as it is now??