First Cycle: Testo c + tren a + masteron

Status
Not open for further replies.

Desohigh

Bluelighter
Joined
May 9, 2013
Messages
306
Hello guys.

Briefly;
I'm doing bodybuilding for 8 years.
I'm now 26, 1.84cm and 91 kgs. I got bodyfat around 11%

I never used any steroids till now but I want to.

My aim is to cut like 4%-5% bf.

I think my muscle size is enough for me and don't want to gain size and see myself that big in front of the mirror; it'll be hard to maintain that size in the future and effect my psychology.

Anyway, I don't think running a testo only cycle is a must and I can easily access to a good quality tren.

For nutrition; I'm trying myself like I'm in a cylce for 2 months, and got obsessed to eat very clean. I cook my own meals, got obsessed with the grams which I take. I prefer mostly turkey, beef, salmon, asparagus, broccoli, brown cracked wheat (like rice - hope it means anything). I consume cucumber, avocado and nuts between meals. The typical clean eating thing :|
For ex: If I smoke weed at my friends, I bring my meals for the next day to his home etc. (That really helps a lot)

Anyway, I want to use
Tren acetate (200mg per w)
Testo cyp (250mg per w - I got some feedbacks from my friends which gone 500 - 750mg per w and not any different results between them)
Masteron (maybe last 4 weeks)

For PCT, I will use HCG 1500x3 after 2-3 weeks.
For tren Cabaser is a must, also keep arimidex clomid just to feel safe.

I got 1 month to start to my cycle and trying my best to get info all about I can encounter while i'm in cycle.

Any tips or recommendation instead of masteron?
 
Ok, by your own admission you don't want to gain any size. So you have no need for a multi-compounded cycle.

Since you have never used any gear before, you would do very well on 500mg Test cypionate per week for 10-12 weeks.

No need for the Tren (you also do not need cabergoline with it either). No need for Masteron.

All you are trying to do is preserve muscle tissue while restricting calories and losing bodyfat. This will easily be accomplished on the Testosterone alone. And before somebody says it's not enough, 500mg per week would be probably more than 10 times what you would normally produce. So, it's a lot!

As for PCT, don't do the HCG. Follow GF's protocol:

Adex last few days of cycle
Week 1 Clomid 50mg
Week 2 Clomid 50mg
Week 3 Clomid 25mg
Week 4 Clomid 25mg + Nolva 20mg
Week 5 Nolva 20mg
Week 6 Nolva 10mg
Week 7 Nolva 10mg + Adex 0.5mg last few days
Week 8 Adex 0.5mg
OFF........................
 
Anyway, I want to use
Tren acetate (200mg per w)
Testo cyp (250mg per w - I got some feedbacks from my friends which gone 500 - 750mg per w and not any different results between them)
Masteron (maybe last 4 weeks)

For PCT, I will use HCG 1500x3 after 2-3 weeks.
For tren Caber is a must, also keep arimidex clomid just to feel safe.

I got 1 month to start to my cycle and trying my best to get info all about I can encounter while i'm in cycle.

Any tips or recommendation instead of masteron?

You have been told a very old school methodology on cycle and PCT....

You could increase Tren-a to 300-350mg/week (ED injections)... Test as low as 150-200mg/week (2X/week injections)

Tren is rather suppressive of HPTA, you could stop the Tren 1 week before the Test-C and drop that to 100mg for the last week....

Forget the Masteron there are little to no anti-E properties associated with Mast...

DON'T use hCG for PCT.... there is a likelihood of downregulating GnRH...

Caber..?(I could spend days arguing why not to use caber for conditions you don't have).....Just to say: We DON'T advise D2 agonists here, especially on low dose cycles..!!

The PCT protocol posted by CFC will do just fine:

Adex last few days of cycle
Week 1 Clomid 50mg
Week 2 Clomid 50mg
Week 3 Clomid 25mg
Week 4 Clomid 25mg + Nolva 20mg
Week 5 Nolva 20mg
Week 6 Nolva 10mg
Week 7 Nolva 10mg + Adex 0.5mg last few days
Week 8 Adex 0.5mg
OFF......................
 
I like your philosophy about not getting too big to a size that's unsustainable and forever feel like you are off your best look... that is problematic. I also like what cfc saying about only preserving mass don't need multiple supplements. If you say 11% you're probably 15 percent unless you have good eyes and realistic. The more I learn about body fat the more I suspect 6 percent is probably lowest one can go and remain in fair health. A lot of crazy numbers claimed, but only one picture ever blew me away to the point where I said guy is definitely under 5 that's andreas munzer. And he died in quest for glory.


What I'm doing myself now to break the monotony is a basic cyclical approach. I don't think complicated nutritional approaches mean shit unless ur going on stage. That said, I think 1 gram protein per lb body weight and overall calories are 2 important numbers. I take 1 gram protein lb weight regardless of what day it is; in overall calories, I'm doing an approach like day 1: maintenance - 1500 k-cal day 2h maintenance - 500 day3: maintenance

With 7 days in a week i'll complete two cycles and 7th day will be a maintenance - 500 day.

Also, I try to eat most of my calories in pre and post workout meals, so I'm often basically fasting on a protein shake or a few yolks and egg whites every few hours. I weigh my food and overestimate calories to give myself margin of error but I wouldn't freak out if I go over a few hundred on a 'maintenance' day. I pick one day a week in the morning to lock in my weight for the week although I check on a daily basis. If weight doesn't drop 1% or better per week then take more meals out. Usually it's a case of not being strict w diet and underestimating intake or getting lax. 2 weeks in a row of failing to meet 1 percent loss target means doing cardio and really tightening up numbers and that way water and confusion is at minimum. All the best.
 
I think I'm 11% but nevermind.
http://imgur.com/srNO3KD

I don't want to get a big muscle mass and lose it when the cycle ends.
That's very disturbing. I look kinda "OK" because ego won't let you say "enough".

I just want to be around 5-6% bf at least 1 summer.

For PCT, our country just recommend only HCG, but all the foreign sites recommend clomid+nolvadex.
 
So you come in here and post what you think without backing it with scientific research or citing any sources and call us outdated???
Stop the bullshit first cycle should be test only... If you want to be real then pct is bullshit... Anyone who wants to get anywhere needs to blast and cruise... And stating one needs a dopamine agonist or else blah blah blah? I've ran tren for months at a time with zero prolactin issues. In all honesty no dopamine agonist or even ai should be used unless blood tests confirm the problem or you're just throwing more drugs into the already chaotic mix. And stop with the hcg non sense. GF already posted about it causing further hpta suppression and I'm pretty sure he cited a medical journal to support that. All his info is backed by over 30 years of his aas usage and medical research that he has access to due to his career. So before you come in here slinging your claims about your way being right and discounting HUNDREDS of posts that say otherwise that are supported with evidence, I suggest you do some reading yourself.
 
All of the information here is so incorrect and it flat out kills me, for starters those of you saying not to run caber or some sort of medicaton to inhibit progesterone from increasing are idiots, unless you want milk running from your big puffy nipples, gyno, libido issues and even infertility issues you absolutely need a prolactin. Tren is one of the HARSHEST compounds out there and while running any 19-Nor steroid you need to run caber or prami to control your prolactin levels, it's just as important as running an AI with test.

Now your cycle is an absolute mess, and the pct you suggested as well as every other is shit as well. Test ONLY for your first cycle, if you run Multiple compounds on your first cycle it's going to be impossible to pin point what sides are coming from what, that's why you start with test only see how you react than add another compound on your next cycle. Why this forums sticky for "First cycle" includes dianabol blows my mind because anyone with half a mind knows that even though you CAN do it, does not mean you should. It's the same aspect as stated above, dianabol converts to estrogen as well and that means increased sides, so start with test only and stick with it, and 15 weeks isn't necessary either, your muscle growth tends to slow down dramatically after the 8-10 week mark so 12 weeks is a perfect time frame for your first cycle.

Let me lay out what a first cycle SHOULD look like
Weeks 1-12 Test E 500mgs a week (Monday and Thursday) 3.5 days apart.
Weeks 1-12 HCG 500 ius a week (250ius taken on same days as test Monday and thursday)
arimidex at 0.25 mg Every other day (unless you notice signs of High estrogen like loss of libido, itchy or sensitive nipples, moods wings etc..)
Now you discontinue adex 3 days before you start your pct, and with test e you should wait 14 days after last pin to begin your PCT to let your testosterone levels drop because when this happens your body is going to start telling itself to start producing it's own naturally again that's when you jump in and Kickstart it with Clomid AND nolvadex, not one or the other they both work in synergy with one another and combined give the best chances of the smoothest recovery possible. Also discontinue Hcg when you discontinue your test.
Your pct should look like this
week's 14-15 clomid at 75mg ed/Nolvadex at 40mg Ed
weeks 16-17 Clomid at 50mg Ed/Nolvadex at 20mg Ed.
NO ADEX OR HCG SHOULD BE RAN DURING THE PCT PERIOD.
I think I touched on everything but if you have any further questions please feel free to ask, as I can see this forum is highly neglected and has very outdated information.

I will leave this informative post on for now, purely for amusement purposes...!!!

I'll comment later if I can find time to waste...!!!
 
Please do I'm looking forward to it.

Thank you for taking the time to reply... First of all I will apologize for advising Tren in a first cycle, that is NOT what we do here, we always advise a single compound Test only for any first cycle. I had clearly missed read the OP...!! (I too am on several private member boards, writing multiple replies at the same time)...

Blood levels should dictate choice on any ancillaries, IF NEEDED..!!

As this is a harm reduction forum we don't advise polypharmacy for conditions you don't have, just because..!! (AI's, D2 agonists)

hCG is sometimes recommended on long blasts for general healthier living, its not needed on a short, low dose, test only cycle...

PCT:
As you approach the start of PCT, as your steroids dissipate you introduce an Aromatase Inhibitor. You do this to reduce the amount of estrogen conversion that takes place.

Your externally administered testosterone will drop to nothing and you will not be producing testosterone as you start PCT. So you want to make sure that you have reduced estrogen as well.

This is just going into PCT. You want to create a situation where both estrogen and testosterone will rise together. So the AI of your choice should be used in the last 2 weeks of the cycle and immediately discontinued at the start of PCT.

The choice of SERM and duration may vary but PCT should always start with Clomid. You do not need a huge dose in the first few days.

Here is what to do:
Start with Clomid for three weeks and reduce the dosage and overlap it with Nolva in week four. Dose Nolva for 3 weeks thereafter.
After 7 weeks in the last day of Nolva introduce an AI and run that by itself for three or four days.
Thats about it. PCTs as you can see are very long. But they are designed to recover from 6 month cycles. PCT is about as long as the cycle.
Then stay off and learn to be natural again for another 6 months or more.
In my opinion this approach can allowed you to fully recover after years of experimentation.

Addendum
Another thing I forgot to mention is don't wait for the steroid ester to completely clear before starting Clomid. Start w/ moderate dosed Clomid EOD or lower dose ED during the time wait for longer esters to clear.
This is relevant for something like Cypionate.... so during the 16 days it takes to clear dose Clomid.

A SERM is not a SERM is not a SERM.

Clomid does more then act as an anti-estrogen in certain tissues. In the pituitary it acts as an estrogen, sensitizing pituitary cells to the actions of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH). This stimulates release of FSH & LH. Enclomid the active anti-estrogenic component of Clomid is as effective as Clomid in this regard.
Tamoxifen (an anti-estrogen) is completely ineffective.
Clomid mediates the positive effect at the estrogen receptor.
Both Clomid and tamoxifen are almost equally effective at binding to the pituitary estrogen receptor. As noted Tamoxifen has no estrogen mediated effect in terms of an ability to increase GnRH-stimulated release of FSH & LH. What it does is just occupy the receptors...or block them so that E2 or Clomid can not have a positive influence.
That isn't what we want in the first few weeks of PCT. That is why not to use Tamoxifen in those early weeks.

Here is one of several studies demonstrating what I refer to:

Disparate effect of clomiphene and tamoxifen on pituitary gonadotropin release in vitro, E. Y. Adashi, A. J. Hsueh, T. H. Bambino and S. S. Yen,AJP - Endocrinology and Metabolism, Vol 240, Issue 2 125-E130

The direct effects of clomiphene citrate (Clomid), tamoxifen, and estradiol (E2) on the gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH)-stimulated release of luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) were studied in cultured anterior pituitary cells obtained from adult ovariectomized rats. Treatment of pituitary cells with Clomid or enclomid (10(- M) in vitro for 2 days resulted in a marked sensitization of the gonadotroph to GnRH as reflected by a 6.5-fold decrease in the ED50 of GnRH in terms of LH release from 2.2 x 10(-9) M in untreated cells to 3.6 x 10(-10) M.

Treatment with E2 or Clomid also increased the sensitivity of the gonadotroph to GnRH in terms of FSH release by 4.3- and 3.3-fold respectively.

Tamoxifen, a related antiestrogen, comparable to Clomid in terms of its ability to compete with E2 for pituitary estrogen receptors, was without effect on the GnRH-stimulated LH release at a concentration of 10(-7) M. Furthermore, tamoxifen, unlike Clomid, caused an apparent but not statistically significant inhibition of the sensitizing effect of E2 on the GnRH-stimulated release of LH. Our findings suggest that Clomid and its Enclomid isomer, unlike tamoxifen, exert a direct estrogenic rather than an antiestrogenic effect on cultured pituitary cells by enhancing the GnRH-stimulated release of gonadotropin

PROLACTIN AND GYNO?

Although prolactin receptors have been demonstrated in breast tissue, including gynecomastia [1], hyperprolactinemia probably plays an indirect role in gynecomastia by causing central hypogonadism. Most men with gynecomastia do not have elevated serum prolactin levels, and not all men with hyperprolactinemia develop gynecomastia. Nevertheless, it has been shown in cultured breast cancer cells that prolactin and sex steroid receptors (especially the progesterone receptor [PgR]) may be coexpressed and may cross-regulate each other?s expression [2,3]; acute prolactin treatment produced an increase in PgR and a decrease in AR content. If this were to occur in the breast tissue of hyperprolactinemic men, the resulting increase in PgR expression and decrease in AR expression could promote breast tissue growth and result in gynecomastia.

[1] Gill S, Peston D, Vonderhaar BK, et al. Expression of prolactin receptors in normal, benign, and malignant breast tissue: an immunohistological study. J Clin Pathol 2001;54:956?60.

[2] Ormandy CJ, Hall RE, Manning DL, et al. Coexpression and cross-regulation of the prolactin and sex steroid hormone receptors in breast cancer. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1997;82(11): 3692?9.

[3] Gutzman JH, Miller KK, Schuler LA. Endogenous human prolactin and not exogenous human prolactin induces estrogen receptor a and prolactin receptor expression and increases estrogen responsiveness in breast cancer cells. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 2004;88:69?77. from: Endocrinol Metab Clin N Am (2007) 36: 497?519


While prolactin and progestins on their own don't seem to cause gyno, is it possible that something similar to the post-pregnancy lactation in women could happen in men taking progestational androgens? In this case it might be that increased E and progestational signaling (if you're on a suppressive compound that also acts on the progesterone receptor) causes gyno formation (and increased prolactin levels), and then when you stop the compound and go into PCT (loss of E and progestational signaling), lactation is possible.

In the belief that certain anabolic steroids increase prolactin levels as well as act as agonists at the progesterone receptor, some have advocated the use of antiprolactin agents, like bromocriptine, or progesterone receptor blockers like RU-486 to treat AAS related gynecomastia, in lieu of more traditional drugs like tamoxifen. In truth, the etiology of gynecomastia is unknown and a number of agents including estrogens, progestins, GH, IGF-1, and prolactin may be involved. However, most authorities believe that a decreased (T+DHT)/E ratio is central to the development of gyno, and that blocking the effects of estrogen, or increasing T + DHT levels, is central to ameliorating the problem.
Regarding prolactin, androgens decrease prolactin levels whereas estrogens increase prolactin. Non-aromatizing androgens have never been shown to elevate prolactin levels in humans, but testosterone has, due to its aromatization to estradiol. Prolactin secreting tumors, or prolactinomas, are often associated with gyno. But in these cases the prolactin is believed to induce gyno by suppressing testosterone production: "Prolactinomas that are sufficiently large to cause gynecomastia do so as a result of impairment of gonadotropin secretion and secondary hypogonadism". However, this is a moot issue in AAS users whose gonadotropin secretion is already blunted. According to research, prolactin may have a direct stimulatory effect on mammary tissue development, but only in the presence of high estrogen levels. The presence of mild hyperprolactinaemia is therefore not uncommon in patients with estrogen excess. Significant primary hyperprolactinaemia, on the other hand, may directly stimulate epithelial cell proliferation in an estrogen-primed breast, causing epithelial cell proliferation and gynaecomastia.
So rather than focusing solely on lowering prolactin levels which may be elevated in users of aromatizing androgens, attacking estrogen should be the first line of action.

Progesterone acts in concert with estrogen to promote breast development, and at least part of any role played by synthetic progestins may be to stimulate IGF-1 production in the breast. But again, blocking the action of progesterone or synthetic progestins is not practical. Specific progesterone receptor antagonists like RU-486 block not only the progesterone receptor, but the androgen receptor as well, and have actually been associated with the development of gynecomastia. In any case, progesterone is thought to act on the breast to enhance the effects of estrogen so once again, attacking estrogen is the easiest and most logical approach.

DHT is thought to act as an aromatase inhibitor and perhaps compete directly with estrogen for binding at the estrogen receptor. DHT has been used in several case reports and controlled trials to successfully treat gynecomastia. So perhaps a viable strategy would be to combine DHT gel with tamoxifen. I would recommend tamoxifen rather than an aromatase inhibitor due to the simple fact that tamoxifen has been widely used in numerous controlled studies to succesfully treat gynecomastia, whereas the evidence to support the efficacy of aromatase inhibitors is scanty at best.

Conclusions:

It seems that all the problems that come with increased progestational activity may require high estrogen to become really noticable...so if you can stop the estrogen (on cycle or during the "rebound"), you should have a good chance of avoiding the progestational sides...that's my theory from my reading, anyway.

And finally, prolactin does NOT cause gyno (well, only in extremely rare cases) in most PH/DS/AAS users. It can cause lactation if gyno (generally caused by low T/E ratio, i.e. low T, high E; increased progestational activity is also involved) has progressed to the point where the ductal systems are more developed and prolactin levels have risen enough to trigger lactation. Increased prolactin and subsequent lactation is a side effect of gyno, not a cause.

Androgens overall decrease prolactin. Gyno has always and still is treated solely with anti-estrogen therapy (barring surgery once it gets too big and androgen therapy if the cause is hypogonadism) with no research being done into newer or better ways of treatment. This lends further credence that neither progestins nor prolactin plays any role in gyno in the absence of estrogen, and that standard anti-estrogen therapy (preferably at the receptor to avoid direct drug/ER interactions) should cause gyno to regress in any and all cases.

50+ years of research and countless blood tests have always shown androgens to decrease prolactin levels, with no account ever of androgens having a positive effect on prolactin of prolactin signalling in healthy tissue in the absence of estrogen.

Weidenbach et al (1980) performed a study in castrated and adrenalectomized rats. These rats showed a severe drop in prolactin levels. Treatment with testosterone did not affect prolactin, but treatment with estradiol drastically increased prolactin. The reason for the drop in prolactin in these rats was therefore likely due to the removal of estrogen-producing organs, clearly demonstrating the estrogen-dependency of prolactin release.

Progesterone in the breast, is anti-proliferative, especially in the presence of androgen. It counters gyno.

Lowering Prolactin can potentially lead to among others: reduced testosterone, reduced sperm counts and reduced immunity. Quit messing with your endocrine system for no reason. Keep your prolactin at NORMAL levels and stop using things like Bromocriptine and L-Dopa just "because"
 
Than I will Kindle agree to disagree with you on your pct protocols, how running an AI is Optional (and a dopamine agonist if your using a 19-Nor) and HCG on cycle. I've stated my reasons why clomid and nolva should be used together for 4 weeks, 6 isn't needed they work In SYNERGY.

So, no science on offer then...!!!
 
Do you want me to provide science behind my proven ways? I can if you'd like I just didn't feel like digging through my main forums stickies, but if you absolutely want me to I will just say so.

Considering I've taken the time to explain my reasoning to you, it might be seen as reasonable to put forward your evidence, as you were quite blunt dismissing earlier posts..

We are taught at Med-School minimal polypharmacy for maximum therapeutic effect, we apply that methodology here, with the genuine belief our advice is based on current and up to date medical data...
One thing I believe our forum has, as opposed to other more popular steroid boards, is we don't have products for sale.... We have no hidden agenda here..


When you find links to the source of your "proven ways", does that website have products for sale..?
 
Considering I've taken the time to explain my reasoning to you, it might be seen as reasonable to put forward your evidence, as you were quite blunt dismissing earlier posts..

We are taught at Med-School minimal polypharmacy for maximum therapeutic effect, we apply that methodology here, with the genuine belief our advice is based on current and up to date medical data...
One thing I believe our forum has, as opposed to other more popular steroid boards, is we don't have products for sale.... We have no hidden agenda here..


When you find links to the source of your "proven ways", does that website have products for sale..?
This alone reminds me of how big pharma states their way/product works and shows tests that were funded by them, a partner company, or a company owned by them... Bias and hidden agendas.
 
My forum has no prouts for sale and no need to lie about anything. When I get home I will attach links on the importance of hcg, proper pct and I've already given prolactin and AI research.
Oh I wasn't targeting you with that statement. More or less I've had doctors try to push shit on me claiming it works and upon further research find out all the trials and information of the drug was funded by the developer. Also the supplement industry as a whole does this kind of shit.
 
My forum has no products for sale and no need to lie about anything. When I get home I will attach links on the importance of hcg, proper pct and I've already given prolactin and AI research.

Not sufficient for this forum you haven't..!!!!

We expect links to research papers backing up your claims, plus maybe some anecdotal evidence of your years of training and compound experience...

Plenty products for sale here:

http://www.steroidology.com/forum/a...agement-gynecomastia-prevention-reversal.html
 
Last edited:
The only point I agree with in Chris Columbia's post is about not needing multiple compounds, especially on a first cycle (though particularly because this dude only wants to shed some fat). However the first person who replied (me) did state that!

The rest is just dated information, circa 2002.

And with his lively and invigorating attitude 8) I think he's probably a bbing board 'guru':

2ij0r9x.jpg
 
I think I'm 11% but nevermind.
http://imgur.com/srNO3KD

I don't want to get a big muscle mass and lose it when the cycle ends.
That's very disturbing. I look kinda "OK" because ego won't let you say "enough".

I just want to be around 5-6% bf at least 1 summer.

For PCT, our country just recommend only HCG, but all the foreign sites recommend clomid+nolvadex.

Honestly, I would say you're closer to 15% really, but if you do get down to single digits bf%, I think you'll have a pretty decent, and relatively sustainable physique.
 
As for hCG, I don't understand why anyone would want to create another level of suppression in their HPTA? There is really no use for hCG, it desensitizes leydig cells in your testes to Leutinizing hormone so that when you eventually cease using hCG it takes a while for your testes to become sensitive to your own body's natural LH, thus prolonging your recovery. The use of hCG in males is limited to increasing fertility in HRT such that guys have enough viable sperm for their partners to conceive. When you are "shut down" your testes actually become more sensitive to LH due to receptor up-regulation. All that hCG will do is prolong your recovery.

I'd rather taper off and for this reason I wouldn't bother with SERMS as aromatase inhibitors like anastrozole are a better accompaniment to this protocol. Adding more PCT drugs into the mix just means more poly-pharmacy and more side effects.

With regard to hCG, receptor down regulation is just a reality for receptor mediated drug therapy. While the literature on this particular topic is scarce I have seen one showing the effects in humans as well as rats, albeit the human study was with large dosages greater than 1000iu. Regardless, while you may be able to safely administer therapeutic doses of hCG without inducing primary hypogonadism, why would you? LH is not the problem when it comes to coming off cycle, LH concentrations rise simultaneously with a fall in serum androgen levels and it is a myth that all exogenous testosterone must clear your system before your HPTA restarts. Your body cannot tell the difference between endogenous and exogenous testosterone.

So if hCG mimics LH yet serum LH rises with falling androgen concentrations anyway, whats the point in administering it? Having said that it is important to note that when I say androgens I mean testosterone. Other AAS which have different binding affinities for the androgen receptor may still be suppressing LH production in spite of negligible levels of circulating testosterone. For this reason I have seen it been recommended that a low dose test bridge (100mg/ week) be used before the taper in order to allow time for other AAS to clear your system. The bridge should be equal to at least 4x the longest half life of any co-administered androgens/anabolics.
Your brain senses the amount of sex hormones in your blood and adjusts the secretion of LH accordingly. Its doing this all the time. It doesn't matter whether its secreted from your testes or injected into the body, testosterone is testosterone. Your brain only senses how much is in your blood not where it came from.

Actually you can run more than a 100mg of test a week and still maintain LH secretion, like I said LH secretion resumes with lowering serum concentrations of sex hormone.

Why run hCG during cycle? To not have small balls?

hCG's use is limited to fertility and HRT applications. The thing is, the doctor isn't too concerned with your natural LH secretion when going on HRT, any real endocrinologist (not from some dodgy men's clinic) will only really prescribe with the view that it's a permanent thing so why worry about LH secretion? If someone is worried about having kids then yeah sure they might also use hCG. But the reality is that most guys on HRT are past that and already have kids.

You don't really have to worry about permanent shut down with normal cycle lengths. Studies where guys have been administered 600mg of test for 6 months show that LH production still resumes as normal.

Estradiol itself is not very nice to your testes, this is seen in studies that have shown SERMS are able to ameliorate hCG induced leydig cell desensitization (1). In this particular study, 1500iu of hCG for only 3 days was enough to elicit the accumulation of 17 alpha-hydroxyprogesterone (17 OHP). 17 OHP is a precursor to testosterone and an elevated ratio of 17 OHP to testosterone suggests disruption to testosterone biosynthesis. So yip hCG does cause leydig cell desensitization. Tamoxifen was able to alleviate this however it must be noted that testosterone production wasn't increased any more so than with the administration of hCG alone, thus suggesting there is some other factor that comes into play. What it is exactly, we don't know. So if we are throwing significant amounts of oestrogen into the mix, it makes sense we should see some damage to leydig cells and evidently hCG actually facilitates estrogen related desensitization of these cells.

Secondly, hCG has a much longer half life than endogenous LH, from memory it is around 33hr compared to only 20min for LH. This has a profound effect on the HPTA as shown in this particular study where the examined the amount of testosterone production after, continuous infusion of recombinant LH or multiple bolus doses (2). Multiple bolus doses of LH allow for greater testosterone production than a continued infusion because this mimics the body's natural diurnal pattern of pulsatile LH secretion. So if you are injecting hCG which has a much longer half life, you are interfering with the the pulsatile release of LH from your pituitary, as a note it's hypothesised that hCG production during pregnancy is what feeds back to the hypothalamus to stop pulsatile LH release (3).

Leydig cells don't just die off because they aren't being stimulated, they reduce their volume. LH helps to maintain leydig cells in their differentiated state i.e. it keeps them producing testosterone, it doesn't keep them alive. In light of this, there is no reason why a taper would not work and actually takes no longer than a conventional PCT. Further to this, because leydig cells are not permanently damaged, not keeping them stimulated while on cycle isn't really going to affect you so long as you taper off. The taper gives your testes time to resume normal response to LH as you are not all of a sudden dropping testosterone cold turkey. You have enough exogenous testosterone in your system to maintain sexual function and hold onto gains but not enough to suppress your natural LH production and compromise testicular function.

You have to stand back a bit and look at the big picture, ultimately a PCT is about recovering as quickly as possible and with the least side effects as possible. A test taper allows you to do this. Sure you can take hCG here and there and then SERMs to offset leydig cell desensitization and then time hCG to mimic LH secretion as best you can, then deal with the added sides from nolva clomid, hCG etc. But you wan't your body to achieve homeostasis, I don't see how throwing more drugs into the mix all the while lining your dealer's pockets is going to be the easiest way of doing this. I guess its up to the individual and what they feel is the best option for them.

1. Smals AG et al.Tamoxifen suppresses gonadotropin-induced 17 alpha-hydroxyprogesterone accumulation in normal men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1980 51(5): 1026-9.

2. Veldhuis JD et al. Dynamic testosterone responses to near-physiological LH pulses are
determined by the time pattern of prior intravenous LH infusion. Endo and metab 2012 303(6): 720-728.

3. Mores N et al. Activation of LH receptors expressed in GnRH neurons stimulates cyclic AMP production and inhibits pulsatile neuropeptide release. Endocrinology 1996 137(12): 5731-4.
 
I'm admittedly an outside observer in that I know the bare minimum about these topics however, my instincts are good. They lead me to believe on a subject like pct people will parrot the shit out of. What they read on a board. The truth is it's probably far less complicated. Take dieting for example: eat less progressively until you reach a point of losing weight at 1-2 lbs per week. Yet there's a fucking dieting industry with thousands of approaches to maximize such and such bullshit bullshit and make money off ridiculous farfetched notions of what's really basic.

The same is probably true here. I can't stand people who have no special expertise pontificating about theoretical merits of shit they know nothing about. Anecdotal evidence is fine in the sense you can talk about how you ran into a problem why you think it happened what you did to resolve it how you control for the fact it wasn't another factor etc etc but PLEASE don't come on here like some fucking professor emeritus of bullshittery and speak pompously when your vocabulary doesn't even support the claim to a high level of education and the rest of your stilted verbiage is lifted in bits and pieces from elsewhere.
 
When I see someone argue that an AI just isnt needed on a cycle, I think to myself, why is it not needed? Based on what? Because you haven't got gyno? The user may not experience side effects such as gyno, water retention, acne, but there estrogen level is sure as f*ck high.

Maybe if you had any experience in application of exogenous hormones, or a basic knowledge of endocrinology or pharmacology, you might be aware that when on a cycle of AAS endogenous hormones rise simultaneously with exogenous testosterone....
We don't consider it an issue if not experiencing side effects, because the general consensus is not to be concerned about elevated E2, only if the Androgen:Estrogen ratio is out of whack..!!

It might be nice to see your own work, rather than cut-n-paste garbage from popular steroid forums..!!
 
I'm new to this forum I am not new to the bodybuilding-steroid scene. I'm done trying to help people who won't accept it. Have a good day and enjoy your testicular atrophy and crushed estrogen (during pct for using an AI)


You are a 17yr old schoolboy..... Get back to your crack pipe..!!
 
Age is no correlation to knowledge, but nice trying to make yourself feel better by acknowledging I'm younger than you.
Age is a correlation to experience which in this field surpasses strictly science. As there is not much human studies done with aas, personal experience is the next best thing. If you are indeed 17, then you hardly have much experience.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top