Synchronicity

[What 23]

I had originally just gone with the 2 and 3, with 4. Then when alasdair questioned, I decided to explore and take another step and decide that even if I didn't see it, I'd play if it fits. 1 fit in the 6 and the 7. Nothing else worked, if the certain numbers stayed the same, as in 6 remained next to 7 to base, and 2 next to 3, in their order. Fulfilling this rule of the numbers being together already, to allow placement, certainly, only 234 works. But 67 may be the next step.

63, Interesting... But this would require another look, and also, if I keep 2 and 3-- If I began there, as I did, I may not have a 3 to work with, unless I go by a different way. I was wanting to observe how it goes together, only allowed to use a numeral once. It certainly keeps it easier to justify/keeps it simple... Not to say there aren't more ways of seeing things. I don't know.

63, though, interesting.

 

[kaya_9]

Awesome :D! I enjoyed reading.

There is a group on Facebook that I am somewhat active in, that is really very active, with as of this writing, 5,618 members. It's one of the better forums that I've found for discussion, and sharing of stories of synchroncities. Might check it out, if you're on there (search synchroncity). If you do try to join and aren't approved within a few days, let me know. I've made a few connections there.

Thanks for reading...Love to see that, but deleted my acct many years ago...Any friend I find important to talk to or vice versa..I do by the phone..send pics, etc


About synchs in general, I think a great deal depends on perception and world views...If you have a strictly Science-only type world view, then you will probably discount many, if not all, synch experiences.

I went through that phase, and then I had massive experiences-no ingestion of acid at the time, etc- that taught me otherwise.

 

[alasdairm]

They don't fit.

The 234 pattern "works", somewhat, even though it's completely arbitrary.

The 167 pattern doesn't work at all...
You said you were looking at digital numbers and you saw a 4 in the gap between 2 and 3.
But there is no 1 in the gap between 6 and 7. There is, however, a 1 in the gap between 63.
But that doesn't fulfill your agenda.

1+2+3+3+4+6=19



See above.

what 23, i quote this only so you can see that i'm not the sole critic. foreverafter seems as unconvinced by me of your contrived examples.

why did you use that specific typeface, by the way - it's a style of digit that hasn't been commonly used for, what, 30 or 40 years? nobody writes numbers like that any more... i guess if you had used a more contemporary typeface, your example would not have worked.

interesting...

alasdair

 

[What 23]

I know you aren't my only critic, and I've been very open about this one. I could argue it... I still see these kinds of numbers all of the time, on digital readouts and things. I don't see it as uncommon. Then there is the simplicity of it... Though that can be argued in that certainly in writing it by hand it is more simple to just write the symbol like we do, in a flow.

I was looking at this picture, to begin.

Where this was the warmest it had been that day, and I posted it on my Facebook, having just got it and joined a synchronicity group. I was borrowing my dad's car and enjoying the oranges- it was the first day, and this was the furthest away I had to go for work that day, where it read the warmest. I like I said posted, well, the image to the left, first, and then realized the image to the right had just been posted, with matching/similar oranges.

Anyways, that's what's going on with the image. And I was looking at the 23 here, which is at the edge, and the sun, which is also at the furthest edge. The 23 looked like a 4, and I has never seen that.

23 and 4 has related to me before.

And as I posted above, in the normal type, on its side, 23 to me can look like a heart. Not that it has to, but I see it. 4 chambers to a heart.

Anyways, I like it. Not sure how the regular type 4 fits there, though. Ha.

This is something that interests me, anyways--something I'll probably continue to examine. I'll probably try to stick to what is common.

 

[alasdairm]

Though that can be argued in that certainly in writing it by hand it is more simple to just write the symbol like we do, in a flow.

who writes a 4 like this by hand:

?

absolutely nobody. that 4 only appeared with 7-element lcd number displays and it's already an anachronism.

Anyways, I like it. Not sure how the regular type 4 fits there, though. Ha.

it's cool. it's totally cool that you like it. i'm sure i find things aethetically pleasing that you would not. and thats' cool too.

but to suggest there's some deeper meaning because that version of the 4 fits into the 2 and the 3 like that? that's my point. maybe there is something spiritual and mystical and magical to it. but maybe there's not.

alasdair

 

[What 23]

I could argue.

If we are to be able to create all numbers, these 7 segments are efficient. Even if perhaps one considers them antique, or not belonging in some way, I imagine many people who deal daily in numbers look at simple calculators, or this kind.

Wow--I Just saw a car on its right side, on the interstate.

 

[swilow]

As Foreverafter has pointed out, the actual symbolic representation of numbers is basically arbitrary. I can understand that seeing a repetition of an actual numerical concept as having some significance, but I think seeing significance in the actual symbols used, outside of their significance in encoding information, is a HUGE stretch.

I recall a thread here years ago of a dude seeing significance in the infinity symbol appearing to look like the number '8'. That, like your analysis of the figures of 2 & 3, is mistaking subjectivity for objectivity, IMO.

 

[What 23]

No offense, but I think that your claiming a higher objectivity here- believing, is not very objective. On a level, perhaps, it may seem that way, but you can't be sure.

You will find I've been open to discussion today, for this, because even I am scrutinizing this. I'll be looking still as I said through various ways of writing/display to see if anything else fits. I've done this before, in ways- it is fun. Its stimulating.

What I know is that it can work. And in their natural order, no others do. But I haven't explored very far, into the other ways of writing...

I don't jump to call things "arbitrary", especially most commonly used things.

And, some fish developed sideways-- Flatfish.

An 8 isn't much different than the symbol for infinity...
From an 8, digitally, all numerals can be created.

To man, of course man's inventions may seem "unnatural".

 

[ForEverAfter]

I don't really see how you can argue that (Arabic) numerological symbols aren't essentially arbitrary, in terms of their relationship to value / magnitude... especially given the various different numerological systems, that I've already mentioned, throughout the world... There's nothing wrong with having a bit of fun finding patterns in alphabetical or numerological systems, but that doesn't mean there's any significance to them.

What I know is that it can work. And in their natural order, none others do.

Are you saying that there aren't three other consecutive numbers in the Arabic numerological system that, when represented with on a 7-point digital LCD, and when the first two are arranged side by side, in ascending order, form a negative space resembling the third one?

That may be true, but I'm not sure why you think that is remotely significant.

There are only eight possibilities, after all, and that is a VERY specific pattern you're looking for.

(012. 123. 234. 345. 456. 567. 678. 789.)

From an 8, digitally, all numerals can be created.

What you're saying, here, is - what - that all numbers that can be represented on a 7-point digital LCD can be represented on a 7-point digital LCD?

Forgive me for saying this, but that seems rather obvious.

...

I hesitate to ask, but what does the flatfish have to do with the... uh... "price of fish" (so to speak)?

 

[What 23]

I don't know about price of fish. But a 4 in this font reminds me of a fish.

With that- my showing it, was basically that the same things can develop oddly. The fish is still a fish. And the guy who saw the 8 as infinite may not have been "wrong".

 

[ForEverAfter]

What kind of fish does it remind you of?
Do you think different species of fish can be arranged to form a significant pattern?

 

[What 23]

But not exclusively...

I don't know. How?

 

[ForEverAfter]

Mother fucking Escher, yo!

 

[What 23]

I guess for "price of fish" my mind may go to the date of 12/21/12, when I was paid 1221.52--The highest sum I've been paid at once in a week or that I can remember at once, and midnight 12/21/12 and midnight 12/22/12- at both times I was driving through a town called Shoals--Shoal which means "school of fish".

I had received a message from a girl named "RockRed" with two numbers, possibly "85", around/in this town. I remember messaging her/reading her message- pertaining to scent, in this town.

My passing through on this day, and my paycheck having numbers of the day--This being the only time it had happened, highest, etc, prompted more interest. Investigation. So I researched Shoals. It is home to the largest geological formation of its kind East of the Mississippi-- a table-rock formation probably formed by water (guessing), called "Jug Rock", bringing an association with water.

The age that the next age is associated with--it's beginning disputed, is Aquarius (water).

Price, every time I hear that I think about Donna. And to me she related with this date of 12/21/12, certainly... She also cried a lot once, and I held her as she did, not knowing what else to do. Though I know her last name means "enthusiasm", and Donna, like her father's name, Donald, is not of the same meaning--Donna meaning "lady". Sometimes Donna reminds me of Dawn. Her hair is like the often color, naturally. I'm also sure she cried the most of anyone I've held. Dawning of the age of Aquarius.

She also liked (likes) the number 44.

I may continue this in another post...
Gabriel... Michael...

 

[What 23]

Ah--Images hinting at like those came to mind. I didn't know how you meant though, or how to say, or quantify.

 

[swilow]

So this is just the random and disjointed musings thread then? Ok, I can dig that...

 

[What 23]

I don't see it as disjointed, or random.

A friend posted about a picture of a dress that people are giving very different responses as to its coloring, to. You may be aware of it.

http://wtnh.com/2015/02/26/dresss-color-draws-debate-on-social-media/

It made me think of synchronicity In that people either see or don't see something. It can be there staring them in the face and they won't see it. Not to say it is always like this... All ways.

The thought came to mind, anyway.

I commented that I saw black and blue.

I saw one person, Ashley Sink, commented that she saw grey and blue, and I 'liked' this comment, then looked at her profile, and my eye was caught by this--Her first displayed image and cover photo:

That I clicked on her, a stranger, I am interested in the first place.

She has posted two Bible verses toward the top, along with some images of her, which I could analyze but it would be messy.

The first two verses she has posted toward the top have verses 23. There are no other verses on her page, at least without expanding her profile (there are two more that I can see if I do, Psalm 62:8 and Joshua 1:9)

Then I notice sometime around this, perhaps just after, someone has posted about this dress in the Synchronicity group that I belong to.

 

[ForEverAfter]

Given the instant accessibility and vastness of the internet, you're bound to find all sorts of things that fit your definition of "synchronicity"... aren't you?

 

[swilow]

Gold and white.

Apparently its blue and black. Weird.

 

[ForEverAfter]

The dress is actually blue and black, but - in the photograph - it's blue and brown due to a back-light effect..

This is weird, though?
Did you seriously see gold and white?