JoeTheStoner
Bluelighter
diggin the inspiration wall.![]()
Grimes in Rodarte for New York Times.
I don't know what is going on lately.
i should buy some candles.
Last edited:
diggin the inspiration wall.![]()
Grimes in Rodarte for New York Times.
I don't know what is going on lately.
those are some pleasant adjectives. if it was some designer i'd never heard of, would be calling it a find and excited to see what they put out next season. it being Valentino left me thinking, "oh. so now i have to wait how many months 'til next time?"i'm surprised you weren't over the moon about that valentino. that gentle, sheer, transparent delicacy. screaaaaams hydrozuanacaine.
dude. wouldn't that be badass. i can't even decide if people would have a cow. it's so random. at least she isn't wearing the barley-there, nude g-string that usually accompanies sheer on the runway. i understand, they don't wanna show slit nor panties. but you can see that g-string. and it's ugly.she shouldn't be wearing panties.
[video=vimeo;110772277]http://vimeo.com/110772277[/video]
binx certainly puts on the best show. her and dahpne got great looking underboob. i dislike that word, but thesaurus.com won't help me out. daphne pulls off the predator, no doubt; she is an alien. but knowing she has braids of fake hair tied onto her head is hard to get past. i don't know that i like the video. in fashion, video does need a big handicap. i at least don't dislike it. the 70s film-y look fits nicely with the setting. probably an after effect. nicely applied. first time i watched it was without sound. second time 'round, not the music i was expecting.
saw Maleficent. elle is a phenomenal disney princess. what a surprise. the character fits her even beyond that. supposed to be this grace-given ray of sunshine in a word turned dark. she's certainly sunshine.
dude. wouldn't that be badass. i can't even decide if people would have a cow. it's so random. at least she isn't wearing the barley-there, nude g-string that usually accompanies sheer on the runway. i understand, they don't wanna show slit nor panties. but you can see that g-string. and it's ugly.
you all listen to sky ferreira? course you do. went ahead and searched this thread. you even told me about her. and i said, "meh." anyway, Blood Diamonds was part of "Go," and listening to it on his sound cloud i ended up hearing his remix of "You're Not The One." been loving it for the past few months. including the original, maybe more so. her music reminds me of her looks. bad, but appealing. i dig her michael jackson moves.
binx killing it.(Oh, my God, I feel it in the air
Telephone wires above are sizzling like a snare
Honey, I'm on fire, I feel it everywhere
Nothing scares me anymore)
hella turnt atm... just happy to see some new posts hurr. i hate seeing my username as last post the next day lol![]()
whoa, too much coincidence going on... pretty sure i'm wearing the same jacket she is...
![]()
![]()
these are posted on the stylist's website, photographer's website, and magazine's website; none of them say who she's wearing. outta my hands. she's so pretty, i really can't handle it. that catfish mouth. she's from some eastern european country that never recovered from the world wars. eating potatoes in a scantily furnished, frozen, one-room apartment. until her parents sold her into a better life. i'm sure of it.
nice job id-ing that Givenchy dress, Kenickie! not much else comes with such satisfaction.
shakespeare and The Flamethrowers. we liking them? i just finished All the Light We Cannot See. i read Four Seasons in Rome a couple of years ago and was a big fan. All the Light We Cannot See didn't disspoint, so i went out and got About Grace yesterday. anthony doerr writes real, real pretty.
those are some pretty awesome shots. theme feels dark in a way, fairytale-esque. the porcelain skin tone plus accessories, especially first one with the antlers reminds me of maleficent . then ya got these saturated colors that pop... really eye catching spread.
Internet media has really changed the way we pay attention to clothes. Is the constant Tumblr of images and cultures a threat, or is it an opportunity?
I’m not so interested myself, but I am interested that other people are interested. I have a huge disinterest in technologies that accelerate cultural speed. Immediately, they make me uncomfortable. When I think about the speed images are consumed on Tumblr it’s already not my thing. The way communication goes over the Internet is not my thing. I can’t be positive or negative about it. But I’m fascinated by what society is becoming, and its evolution. I am watching the behavior more than the thing itself. I am not going on Tumblr to see what is going on. Not in my interest. I am more interested in mystique and romance, what’s difficult to find, aesthetics that are not in your face. When I think about images, naturally I am more attracted when I feel there is certain meaning, when someone is trying to say something. You have to investigate. You are prompted to investigate and understand, more than merely consuming the image. It’s how you judge looking at everything you see. There are things you immediately know are surface, and other things the opposite, and I’m more interested in the opposite. When you find everything so easily, you don’t look deeply anymore and you don’t investigate anymore. And you get bored.