BlindHelperMonkey
Bluelighter
friends could only sully this moment of victory
Your all forgetting that near enough all the infrastructure put in place to get all the oil out of the sea was paid for by the UK, hence financed in London. If you think those Cuntish bankers are gonna let you just up and keep all the black gold for yourselves, frankly you're deluded. Even so the piddly amount of oil produced up there still doesn't make you a net contributor to HMRC. Good luck to you if you wanna go for it though, at least you will get rid of the Tory's once and for all.
urbain, youve just repeated your previous, flawed argument. i cant be arsed to type it again, so just read it again, properly this time. scots law and especially the complete white elephant that is the scottish parliament plus building - dont mean shit, when you become independant, it is internal british law, applicable to scotland as an entity within the united kingdom can you not process that through your drink addled, vitamin d deficient, thick scotch-egg skull?
Was gonna complain about the thread title. Then I noticed that the New Statesman is apparently undecided on how to spell it too - http://www.newstatesman.com/politic...-trade-unions-are-shifting-favour-indepenence.
Can we have it spelled correctly though please - has been bugging me all afternoon![]()
i dont understand why scotland puts up with this oppression. its like mel gibson fought for nothing
i dont understand why scotland puts up with this oppression. its like mel gibson fought for nothing
Explaining her decision on her website, Ms Rowling said there was a "denial of risks" within the "Yes" campaign.
"The simple truth is that Scotland is subject to the same 21st century pressures as the rest of the world.
"It must compete in the same global markets, defend itself from the same threats and navigate what still feels like a fragile economic recovery.
Is it wrong to find that fucking funny?
Let's see what our resident Scots think, eh Dan?