^Psychedelics with similar compounds often elicit fairly similar visuals, so would go as far to say that there is an archetype of any psychedelic visual considering its all math/geometry and that!
I found the visuals with the ACO version ( and I would imagine the ho version being quite similar) to be somewhat unique. Very geometrical. They were closer to n,n, DMT visuals than 4-aco-DMT for me. I found that I didn't have wild closed eye visuals on the aco though but the open eye visuals more than made up for it.
Very cool OEVs and a nice long comfortable trip but hardly anything with closed eyes.
It varies, but in my experience, the two were very similar except that 4-AcO-MET was all around more smoother and felt better, whereas 4-HO-MET felt much rougher on my body whenever I tried it.Can anyone explain the qualitative differences between this and 4-aco-met? The only info I have really found is that 4-aco-met has a longer duration and supposed similar effects.![]()
Not to say everyone feels that 4-aco-met is smoother/better feeling, but why does 4-ho-met seem to be much more popular (at least in these forums)? Is one easier to synth?It varies, but in my experience, the two were very similar except that 4-AcO-MET was all around more smoother and felt better, whereas 4-HO-MET felt much rougher on my body whenever I tried it.
4-HO-MET was sold by many more vendors than 4-AcO-MET was, iirc, but that may have changed recently, who knows.Not to say everyone feels that 4-aco-met is smoother/better feeling, but why does 4-ho-met seem to be much more popular (at least in these forums)? Is one easier to synth?