StoneHappyMonday
Bluelighter
- Joined
- May 10, 2001
- Messages
- 18,084
Already have. 
Ross's parents sent him a book to read. I suppose if someone sends a thick book (1000+ pages) one of the pages could be dosed in acid (?)
“Master and Commander” by Patrick O’Brian review from amazon
"The first clue you have that Master and Commander is not a typical sea adventure is when a sailor is hanged in the opening pages for sexually molesting the ship's goat."

Who said it relied upon good intentions? So long as he had better security practices he woulda lasted longer*, and w/o those hits it does seem damn-clean in terms of his 'philosophical approach'. I definitely found his writings to be grounded enough in 'acceptable hardline libertarianism' (anarcho capitalism? agorism? meh there's so much overlap sometimes) that it would be very disappointing to have seen such an ambitious 'counter economic' project as silk road be tainted by the kid trying to kill people..What "philosophical approach"? (rhetorical question)... what use is an "approach" that relies on good intentions? People will always act in their own interest.
Maybe DPR will hallucinate himself a competent lawyer if he gets enough LSD![]()
Who said it relied upon good intentions?
then blundering on the most sacrosanct of its principles- that of not initiating physical force;
20th Century Fox and Chernin Entertainment have set best-selling author Dennis Lehane to script Silk Road, a fact-based tale taken from an article that Joshua Davis is writing for the Epic website, which is devoted to film-friendly longform journalism. It’s the true story of a young kid who was arrested for putting out a hit on the clients of the Silk Road, the illegal online bazaar he created where one could buy illegal goods including drugs or services like contract killings.
And IMO/IME you are right not to trust them as they have been known to plant false evidence in an attempt to incarcerate us; particularly someone whom they've been trying to burn for a while, yet, haven't been able to using conventional (legal/proper) methods. And I'm sure that several individuals are rotting in prison atm because they were framed by the very people sworn to protect the public.
Where did I say the plan relied upon 'good intentions'? Honestly I'm wondering whether I understood your first reply to me properly.
He spoke of very idealistic, laissez faire ideals. He executed a marketplace that was a testament to them, and then he (may have) violated them by ordering hits. Which part of that were you taking issue with, exactly?
AAnd theres a film in the pipeline already, yawn
A film about a guy sitting at his laptop for a few years will sure make for good viewing.
How about if the film was really about the WoD rather than Ross Ulbricht? And that the Silk Road was merely a tale within a tale? And the film concentrated on the toxic effects of prohibition juxtaposed against the inevitability of people wanting to get high?
Then I'd be dreaming. Because 20th Century Fox won't make that. So is it worth writing it...?
What he failed to grasp is that the state is essential to the operation of capitalism. Without a state, who will prevent the poor taking the wealth from the rich?
^You don't need a thick book to dose one page. I don't get it.
Kind of. From what I linked earlier in-thread:I understood you perfectly well. You didn't use the words "good intentions", I'm paraphrasing DPR's (excuse for) political philosophy.
His political stance is that of free market libertarianism, i.e. getting rid of the state but keeping wage-labour and the class system. He believes (believed?) that by eradicating the state and allowing the free market to operate unhindered, we will all be liberated, that there will be an end to the use of force, an end to violence. That's what I've gleaned from reading stuff he said.
On the need for government:
“This may shock some of you to hear coming from me, but we absolutely NEED government, and good government at that. In fact, the services the current governments of the world monopolize or regulate are some of the most demanded and needed: security/defense, law, dispute resolution, education, healthcare, transportation, utilities, quality control etc.
The question I present to you is, do we want a single entity monopolizing the provision of all of these critical goods and services, or do we want a choice?” [9/29/2012]
Rubbish. Just because crooks can steal from you or I, does not prevent us from trading among ourselves.What he failed to grasp is that the state is essential to the operation of capitalism.
The state participates in taking from the rich to give to the poor...Without a state, who will prevent the poor taking the wealth from the rich?
Where did you see this claim?DPR's claim is that physical force would be unnecessary.
Or it demonstrates that his investigators are corrupt. Or that, given the circumstances, it was the best means to protect oneself and one's livelihood. I'm very eager to see the hits illuminated more because (obviously) it is the determining factor in how I view this kid.However the hit-man debacle demonstrates quite neatly that good intentions are not worth shit.
Well, it's a good thing that, in modern-day america, the rich don't do such things. And it's fantastic that they aren't able to use an even more powerful tool to protect their interests at the expense of the citizenry, namely using our current government. It's great that that's not the case, because it would be very scary to think that those who would use force, are currently able to use the government to do their bidding.In the absence of a state to enforce property rights, the rich will create a state, i.e. hire hit-men. Otherwise, they won't be rich for long.
[emphasis mine]Currently with a state , who's preventing the rich from taking the wealth of the poor.
This. It blows my mind how willfully ignorant of the current setup some can be.One could even argue that in America there is no state, but a corporate entity that manipulates the free market and social policies to solely benefit it's wealthy subsidiaries.