i think that's an honourable ideal but what do you do when people make it clear they're unwilling to adapt and they feel that well-established rules somehow shouldn't apply to them? when tolerating the behavior of one negatively impacts the forum and the experience of many others?I really think the authoritarian route isn't the way to go, and it's a protectionist approach that has much further implications. I genuinely think posters need to learn to adapt to the environment here, to preserve what we have.
how would you decide who should be an exception and who should not? is it defensible to say "that guy gets to come back but you don't" when the reasons are arbitrary (and albeit well-intentioned).But that's not to say there aren't exceptions that shouldnt be considered, and that apealing for compassion in certain situations is a way of doing that (rather than enforcing it)
i am an idealist but i don't believe, nor expect, that we somehow should all just get along. differences of opinion are not only to be expected, they are to be embraced and celebrated. but when somebody can't respect a difference of opinion and responds with inflammatory insults which derail the thread and disrupt the forum, sometimes doing nothing just makes it worse. sometimes, when they won't let it lie, they need a break from bluelight and we need a break from them. that's why we have the public, transparent, incremental discipline system.
but even that doesn't satisfy some people. moderators on bluelight are volunteers and have a great deal of discretion in the manner in which they choose to moderate their forum. some are more laid back. some more focused on discipline. i'd saddened when i see a staff member insulted for trying to do what they think is best for the forum.
i'm also saddened when i'm called a cunt and a nazi when somebody complains to me and i simply explain to them the correct procedure for handling their complaint. i'm also called a hypocrite for the same but i just assume that means the poster doesn't really know what that word means
i think a lot of these issues would not explode the way they do if people checked their ego, but maybe that's just what you get from a bunch of drug-addled fools and an 'anonymous' internet connection...
alasdair
Last edited:

