• 🇬🇧󠁿 🇸🇪 🇿🇦 🇮🇪 🇬🇭 🇩🇪 🇪🇺
    European & African
    Drug Discussion


    Welcome Guest!
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
  • EADD Moderators: Pissed_and_messed | Shinji Ikari

The EADD Linux Technical Gibberings Thread

We need to get you some more RAM shambles. Hang on in there old bean! <3

No problem at all, sirrah. Am hardly bitching (well, no more than is decorous ;)) about a replacement pooter than arrived mere days before me lappy became unusable (at least for me at the moment - still got a lil project for ya one of these weeks :D<3=D). From one of your earlier posts it seems like an eminently upgradeable situation which is just dandy. A bit of minor irritation when it puffs and pants a bit too heavily is a helluva lot better than the other option which currently resides back in its box being not another option :D

I really know nowt about such things but saw you mention those DRAM thingies. Would ones from me old - properly dead - peecee be of any use? They just slot in don't they? Not that I'm planning on fiddling with owt tonight. Just thought it worth an ask really seeing as I have two old pooters beside the lappy presumably full o' bits that may or may not be of use.
 
Although from the top of my head I think the original reason OS X is so popular with media production, etc, was to do with how it handles processing/multi-tasking. I think this was addressed for Windows though. Can anyone elaborate on this as I'm unsure if it's true.

That may be true. Having said that OSX MacOS had a few additional advantages over Windows... at least, earlier versions of Windows, I know nothing of Windows beyond XP or before 95. I think it ran like this:

i) Early days availability / compatability / monopolies. OSX MacOS was more stable and could run processor-intensive tasks like graphics apps with less chance of dying than early Windows.... not only that, Photoshop didn't debut on Windows til version 4. Then people who had learned media production on macs at grunt level became managers of studios and stuck with what they knew when they were controlling their department's resources, ie buying new machines, and the flow of kids from college coming in at the bottom had all learned on Macs. Swapping files between platforms used to be a complete nightmare. Your printer (person, not device) might flip his wig if presented with a Windows Zip disk or even more elderly storage medium because he jolly well had a Mac, so you had one too.

ii) Workflow. SIMPLER and more intuitive earlier in the game than Windows. MacOS workflow (and actually OSX workflow) was more suited to the types of tasks media producers would be performing, like grabbing a load of files from one place, dumping them into an application, processing them there, dumping the output of that into another app... I can't articulate it properly (because I'm drunk) but I used to think Macs were ridiculously overrated until I found myself in a commercial media production environment around 1999, and then it just clicked and I understood. There are lots of minor stumbling blocks and annoyances in older versions of Windows (maybe in current versions too, I don't know) which slow you down dramatically when you're doing those types of tasks. One which springs to mind is this : when you grab a file from a folder and dump it onto a program in your taskbar a Mac will open that file. Older versions of Windows will throw up a stern warning that 'You cannot drop an item onto a button on the taskbar'. Why not just open it, dipshit? (Patent reasons, possibly). The older Macs worked WITH you, Windows always seemed to work AGAINST you or make you do things its way. I grew up with Windows, switched to Macs for work, used them for far less time but was still much faster and more focused doing almost anything on a Mac rather than Windows.
/ramble
 
Last edited:
^and the fact that OS X is in fact BSD/nix at it's core, dressed up in a pretty frock. It can be used by numpties and coders alike. That's what makes it a great system (beyond the overpriced hardware).
 
apple products are for fashion victims.

3kwRvkI.jpg
 
Hmm, I've installed lubuntu, and it does indeed seem to be very quick. Looks hideous out of the box but gradually tackling that problem...
 
I woulda thunk that if you don't have much RAM that could put you in a robbing Peter to pay Paul type situation, but perhaps not, I'm certainly not one of the gurus of which you speak.

What distro you running (see, not even sure if distro is the right word)? I've meddled with the look of lubuntu a bit since I started using it and it's OK-looking now... the speed / responsiveness / battery life increase is fantastic.
 
It may go like a shit house door in the wind, but at the end of the day you've got to look at it day in, day out. Have some self respect man.

This. Absolutely this.

I'd rather wait an hour to open a folder than use fukkin lubuntu.

Pretty things are pretty <3

Also, in memory news, I have recently received a package of new memory thingies. Thank the pooter fairies <3

Now to find a screwdriver so I can actually plug the fuckers in. Hadn't considered that aspect :|

(but uberthanks to the provider of all techy stuffs <3)

Pretty sure even I can muster up a screwdriver. Have tried knives and stuff but the nuts are too tight. Fnarr.
 
I reckon it ain't bad-looking with a little tweaking. Bit old skool, possibly but I'm not really enamoured of glossy transparent bizness, and I don't think it's any worse than Ubuntu 2D. Also, I can run Chrome again happily, which has been an absolute no-go for about six months.


NSFW:
Fn4qOId.jpg


PLUS I have only heard my laptop's fan once since I switched. THAT is quite impressive.
 
Last edited:
Top