They are normal and natural. It's just that they rely on dynamics that science doesn't yet understand.
Might be the most sensible thing I've seen you post buddy
They are normal and natural. It's just that they rely on dynamics that science doesn't yet understand.
Astrologers are not usually psychic, no. They are just using an interpretive tool. When I say the government uses psychics I am not referring to astrologers but to what the intelligence agencies use.
However, a psychic person doing astrology will see more depth and meaning from the configurations than someone who isn't psychic.
I don't think psychic powers are paranormal or supernatural. They are normal and natural. It's just that they rely on dynamics that science doesn't yet understand.
you obviously haven't seen her post much thenMight be the most sensible thing I've seen you post buddy
i didnt know there was a sun and a moon one. how does that work? alls i know is i was born in july and am a cancer. from what i have read my personality definitely fits that of a cancer.
The good-natured Taurus moons are sociable, good company and sensual. Life is worth living for them. They are emotionally balanced, inwardly and outwardly reliable and steady. They like to finish a project, before they start a new one. In turn they lack a bit of spontaneity. They like a regular life and they need a secure hold. Easily they overestimate material securities. Therefore they develop the capacity to make a lot of money and - above all - to keep it. Avarice is not their problem, therefore they enjoy life too much, and they are preoccupied with their bodily well being. Taurus - moons should learn not to take money too important. In relationships they are devoted, tender and steady. Since they are emotionally steady and radiate tranquility, they give energy to others.
Do you think that there is any truth in the zodiac? (You can google the two together type: Sun sign of ____ with a moon sign of ______. Would post a link but its hard 2 do on my phone,if someone finds a good one plz post)
The Forer effect (also called the Barnum effect after P. T. Barnum's observation that "we've got something for everyone") is the observation that individuals will give high accuracy ratings to descriptions of their personality that supposedly are tailored specifically for them, but are in fact vague and general enough to apply to a wide range of people. This effect can provide a partial explanation for the widespread acceptance of some beliefs and practices, such as astrology, fortune telling, graphology, and some types of personality tests.
In 1948, psychologist Bertram R. Forer gave a personality test to his students. He told his students they were each receiving a unique personality analysis that was based on the test's results and to rate their analysis on a scale of 0 (very poor) to 5 (excellent) on how well it applied to themselves. In reality, each received the same analysis:
“ You have a great need for other people to like and admire you. You have a tendency to be critical of yourself. You have a great deal of unused capacity which you have not turned to your advantage. While you have some personality weaknesses, you are generally able to compensate for them. Your sexual adjustment has presented problems for you. Disciplined and self-controlled outside, you tend to be worrisome and insecure inside. At times you have serious doubts as to whether you have made the right decision or done the right thing. You prefer a certain amount of change and variety and become dissatisfied when hemmed in by restrictions and limitations. You pride yourself as an independent thinker and do not accept others' statements without satisfactory proof. You have found it unwise to be too frank in revealing yourself to others. At times you are extroverted, affable, sociable, while at other times you are introverted, wary, reserved. Some of your aspirations tend to be pretty unrealistic. Security is one of your major goals in life. ”
On average, the rating was 4.26, but only after the ratings were turned in was it revealed that each student had received identical copies assembled by Forer from various horoscopes.[2] As can be seen from the profile, there are a number of statements that could apply equally to anyone. These statements later became known as Barnum statements, after P. T. Barnum.
logic said:Noun
Reasoning conducted or assessed according to strict principles of validity: "experience is a better guide to this than deductive logic".
A particular system or codification of the principles of proof and inference: "Aristotelian logic".
Also some people can intuit everything falsely
Astrological signs are determined by the position of the sun relative to certain constellations on a person's day of birth. The problem is, the positions were determined more than 2,000 years ago. Nowadays, the stars have shifted in the night sky so much that horoscope signs are nearly a month off.
Even if the astrological signs were stable, there's no evidence the stars have anything to do with people's day-to-day existence. One 2006 study published in the journal Personality and Individual Differences used data from more than 15,000 people and found no relationship between date of birth and personality.
... *tsk* I'm not even going to try that questionnaire, simply because reading the stars is a science - the answers there are all based on subjective opinion and experience, and therefore one of the lowest and most impure forms of knowledge.
I begin with aries, because it stands at the beginning of the zodiac, spring, march 21.)
those that refute it, try this: Take five of your friends, your real friends. If you only have one, then take one. Your friends will almost always correspond with your compatible star signs.
you seem like the kinda guy who loves the sound of his own voice...What mechanism would this "effect" be mediated by? The apparent positions of the stars in the sky has little bearing on their actual location in space. Further, they can't really do anything to us, the influence of distant stars is indescribably small, and the only meaningful thing about them is truly tiny amount of electromagnetic energy we can detect from them (i.e. starlight...Xrays and gamma rays above the atmosphere, some radio waves make it down to earth too) Gravity, I guess, but come on guys, come on, a pinhead a football field away exerts more gravitational tug on you than distant stars do. In any event, all gravity is does accelerate you (no different than being in an elevator, except the elevator is of a much larger magnitude) and the starlight and radio-waves will be absorbed by your body tissues and like heat them up by maybe 1 x 10-9999999999999999 degrees