• 🇬🇧󠁿 🇸🇪 🇿🇦 🇮🇪 🇬🇭 🇩🇪 🇪🇺
    European & African
    Drug Discussion


    Welcome Guest!
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
  • EADD Moderators: Shambles

Want to be an EADD Mod?

Status
Not open for further replies.
I think a forum members vote would give us some say, a bit ike the unons at the TUC...

name the candidates, but don't publish their applications (this would obviously affect their alications if they knew they were ripe for publick mockeryscrutiny...

Name the candidates, and if they wish i the thread to make their case, it's up to them.

EADD posters can politely discuss the merits or not of each candidate, and at the end we have a vote on the communitys choice

Its not to say the mods will think this is complete pish, and a bad decision, but it might help sway them and allow them to consider our opinions/worries....

You never know, we might all agree with the mods <3

EDIT....AT LEAST TRY IT ONCE, IF IT'S A COMPLETE FARCE, ABANDON IT, BUT IT MIGHT WORK, YOU NEVER KNOW, WE'E NOT ALL IDIOTS HERE

Fuck sake. I need to get a job/life.

I agree, you're too bright to waste yur life away. tIt's quite hard to ge a life without a job/steady incime, hard to be independent, hard to make any plans....

You're one person i imagine would go a bit mad on the rocknroll.
 
Last edited:
Top Posters.. ahahaha.

All that means is you bitches have far too much time on your hands!

;)
 
^
You still make it into the top 50 urbain :p

Mr Monkey feel free to lobby, threaten and knee-cap potential applicants and oh, remember to get your cut of the drugs in payment for services facilitated and rendered. Hopefully after that you'll not forget to pass the applicant details on to BL nor sabotage the voting process or bomb the site.





I'll expect your application sharpish first thing Monday - OK ;)
 
^
You still make it into the top 50 urbain :p

Mr Monkey feel free to lobby, threaten and knee-cap potential applicants and oh, remember to get your cut of the drugs in payment for services facilitated and rendered. Hopefully after that you'll not forget to pass the applicant details on to BL nor sabotage the voting process or bomb the site.





I'll expect your application sharpish first thing Monday - OK ;)

Top 50 doesnt count. All my posts are either calling Spade a ginger pube, or ousting adam west as Mugz.

Perhaps i need to become more constructive in my musings.. :D
 
exactly i may be afrequent poster but most of my posts are just agreeing with people, taking the piss out of jancrows cooking, or reporting people.
 
I think a forum members vote would give us some say, a bit ike the unons at the TUC...

name the candidates, but don't publish their applications (this would obviously affect their alications if they knew they were ripe for publick mockeryscrutiny...

Name the candidates, and if they wish i the thread to make their case, it's up to them.

EADD posters can politely discuss the merits or not of each candidate, and at the end we have a vote on the communitys choice

Its not to say the mods will think this is complete pish, and a bad decision, but it might help sway them and allow them to consider our opinions/worries....

You never know, we might all agree with the mods <3

EDIT....AT LEAST TRY IT ONCE, IF IT'S A COMPLETE FARCE, ABANDON IT, BUT IT MIGHT WORK, YOU NEVER KNOW, WE'RE NOT ALL IDIOTS HERE

No-ones answered this, no mods got a comment?

Any forum users got a comment?.

I'm not saying the forum users decision should have anywhere near as much sway as the mods decision, you lot obviously know ow it works, but it would alow you to be transparent, and tell us why you think the successful applicant is the best choice.

Sometmes forum users won't be happy with your decisions,but they are often not intitially happy anyway.


MM
 
You should organise a gladiator-esque fight to the death to decide. That's how they do it in the wild/up north
 
i believe the title of the thread is " want to be an eadd mod?" where's the small print saying bag heads need not apply? (only spade can use that language round my type)

pp i seriously hope you realised i was joking. You're ace, I've got nothing whatsoever against a functioning productive sensible and responsible baghead. IMO they don't even need to be defined as bagheads, just as i don't ilke it when colleagues or pub pissheads call me a druggie (as they break into anoher £20 pound notefor anothr pint of natch)
 
No-ones answered this, no mods got a comment?

Any forum users got a comment?.

I'm not saying the forum users decision should have anywhere near as much sway as the mods decision, you lot obviously know ow it works, but it would alow you to be transparent, and tell us why you think the successful applicant is the best choice.

Sometmes forum users won't be happy with your decisions,but they are often not intitially happy anyway.


MM

I'm into that idea. Particularly the "tell us why you think the successful applicant is the best choice". Not that I really give that much of a fuck, I might be an annoying cunt but I don't really do much to warrant much interaction with mods, but it would let anyone who (for whatever reason) wasn't chuffed with the mod choice to at least see why that mod was chosen & then (if they're a sensible cunt) be less pissed off. Then again, if you're a sensible cunt, you shouldn't be bothered about who gets to do an unpaid job in the first place.

You should organise a gladiator-esque fight to the death to decide. That's how they do it in the wild/up north

THIS.
 
Mods see post#72


No-ones answered this, no mods got a comment?

Any forum users got a comment?.

I'm not saying the forum users decision should have anywhere near as much sway as the mods decision, you lot obviously know ow it works, but it would alow you to be transparent, and tell us why you think the successful applicant is the best choice.

Sometmes forum users won't be happy with your decisions,but they are often not intitially happy anyway.


MM

I'm into that idea. Particularly the "tell us why you think the successful applicant is the best choice". Not that I really give that much of a fuck, I might be an annoying cunt but I don't really do much to warrant much interaction with mods, but it would let anyone who (for whatever reason) wasn't chuffed with the mod choice to at least see why that mod was chosen & then (if they're a sensible cunt) be less pissed off. Then again, if you're a sensible cunt, you shouldn't be bothered about who gets to do an unpaid job in the first place.

and mods, do'n't just tell me this isn;t the way things are done here, we're not known for beng a hotbed of conservatism, change can work, but if it doesn't and causes muchos headaches for all concerned we're big enough to accept that the olden ways were the best...

I'll even (unofficially, non-BL approved) mod the forum users discussion thread, meting out justice where it's needed, and offering encouragmrnt too. Totalyunbiased too. Unless ColDan Applied, in wich case I'd lose the names of the other nominees sharpish
 
Mr Monkey - who gets to vote, just eadd regulars, all bluelighters? What if some wish their application to be private, what if you ask BL's owner to change the whole sites mod processes to fit in with your wishes, what if...what if you didn't talk so much pish.

Ok. I'll do this for yeh, we'll tell you who the mods / smods choose then you can vote whether you like them and if yes they can stay. If no they can also stay and ban you. Ok.
 
jebus christ on the fucking cross.

I mean, honestly, who wouldn't want to be an EADD mod? what's WRONG with folk?!!!
 
Mr Monkey - who gets to vote, just eadd regulars, all bluelighters? What if some wish their application to be private, what if you ask BL's owner to change the whole sites mod processes to fit in with your wishes, what if...what if you didn't talk so much pish.

Ok. I'll do this for yeh, we'll tell you who the mods / smods choose then you can vote whether you like them and if yes they can stay. If no they can also stay and ban you. Ok.

Everyone, including Mugz' 16 alts, gets a vote.
 
kate said:
Mr Monkey - who gets to vote, just eadd regulars, all bluelighters? What if some wish their application to be private, what if you ask BL's owner to change the whole sites mod processes to fit in with your wishes, what if...what if you didn't talk so much pish.

Ok. I'll do this for yeh, we'll tell you who the mods / smods choose then you can vote whether you like them and if yes they can stay. If no they can also stay and ban you. Ok.EADD posters, peope with 80% of theirposts in EADD.

I'm saying the mods draw up a list of applicants.

They post the applicants names.

The applicants may OR may not add a few words.

EADD users could ask them a specific question.

EADD users could politelycompare the attributes

EADD users come up with their choice of applicants and why.

EADD mods can consider this, take it on board, or dismiss it, even if it's dismissed it's no worse then the situation now.

EADD nods announce the successful applicants, and why, and for what reason this applicant will be better than the users' choice.

You mods all have the ultimate say, but it gives us a chance to air our input. We're always told, and most of us feel this is a community. this would be one way of getting one step closer to being a more real, than a virtual community

Yes kate, I talk some pish, but its only pish cos you can't be arsed to consider it right now.

I'm not suggesting we choose the new mod, I'm not suggestig we scrutinise private applications, i just think the current mods should let us have our say, and at least show willing to listen a bit. And, maybe, just one time, throw caution to the wind and let the users decide completely. if it fails, it fails.

I bet you'd get a few more apps too.

You don;t need to mail all BL members to gt votes in, most EADD postes will have seen the thread anyway, and i bet a lot wont even want to comment.

Gwarn kate, think about this pish<3

And I'm not suggesting the site's owner changes the whole mod process, just have a try in EADD,,we are aspecial forum, a social forum, let us, as a social community have some input, not a final say..

Do any other users think this is valid? Or detrimental? Or unworkable? I'm just looking at a bit more of a democracy.

I suppose it all falls apart if you only get one application :p
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top