I wouldn't mind him changing his opinions about anything he wants AS LONG AS HE DOESN'T HURT ANYONE ELSE .
I thought that might be the response.
Idealists have the distinct advantage of knowing that their opinions will never be tested, never be scrutinised and, indeed, never be put into effect in a public way. They enjoy a prospective and retrospective immunity and a knowledge that they will never be judged because, frankly, they'll never really be listened to by anyone of note. If they hold contradictory opinions or ideas over time, only the dullest of internet warriors will pick them up on it. If they make a mistake or see things incorrectly, the worst they will endure is death by meme. It's a cushy number.
Outside of that sphere, we're all pretty fallible, prone to influence and circumstance, moulded by those circumstances and the demands of the roles we play. Working within the confines of the Misuse of Drugs Act, the advisory
committee (not "he") came to the conclusions they did. I have no doubt that, at times, their decisions were correct according to the scope and remit of the committee. Other times, I would question their decisions. I would also agree with the assessment (above) that Nutt chose his battles in post quite wisely, largely where the scientific evidence was in his favour and less likely to leave his flank open to attack. According to the Government, this is a war. And sometimes, in order to win the war, individual battles get lost or sacrificed.
As to the charge that he's earning money out of this and that he's a media whore... well shock-fucking-horror. A man needs to earn a pound or two somehow and if it means that "the message" gets beyond the confines of these boards and a few pressure groups and thinktanks, then so be it. Do I think he's as pure as you, Ismene? No, I don't. But if you were ever expecting a Timothy Leary clone to be chairman of the ACMD, you're in for a lifetime of disappointment.
I realise that if he were to sit at home and anonymously bitch about how bad the situation is, he'd be less open to attack. But then he'd be depriving the rest of us our jobs.