I'm saying that the lifestyle isn't safe in any way bc of the illicit nature which leads people to inject crud into their veins and not have access to live saving interventions like naloxone under supervised injection. It would have to be regulated if legal but it would be a much safer alternative and one that most addicts would prefer. It's nice you removed an important portion of my post in the quote. I'm living proof that opiates can be used safely mainly bc I use stable doses that are pure and virtually harmless in the way I use them. You must of had problems with opiates in the past and I haven't. Likewise I have a lot of problems with GABAergics and you don't. Just bc you had a problem with opiates doesn't mean everybody should be denied them. Just as my problems with benzos don't mean everyone should be denied them. It should be up to the individual what risks they're willing to take and minimize the risks as much as possible. You say opiates drive their own consumption more than GABAergics, that's entirely subjective. Legalizing opiates would lead to less incidences of the highly motivating torturous wd bc they would be easier to obtain and they would be cheaper. It would also be easier to implement a gradual taper which is a fairly easy way off opiates. I doubt I'm going to convince you of anything, you're mind is set in stone on this matter.
I've seen people die from alcohol, become extremely stupid, get into car wrecks, have dangerous mortal accidents beyond driving while intoxicated, go to work drunk, become as addicted as any opiate junky, rob stores to obtain alcohol and anyone could throw in a bunch more. Nonetheless, I'm not arguing it should be illegal, society isn't going to get destroyed if heroin is legalized, it would just reduce the harm for people already inclined towards that life. I can't really think of someone that I know who would change their lifelong abstinence from opiates just bc it was legalized. You're not giving people enough credit. It's not a very clever trap considering most people know and understand the dependence liability of opiates before they start taking them. Someone who wants to get off opiates above everything else can most often do so safely whereas GABAergics don't afford you that privilege.
No shit that addicts would be better off it were legal. As for society overall, that's uncertain--which I hope you finally understand by this third time I've said it.
Why is it nice I removed a part of your post? I simply had no comment. Watch your logical fallacies.
You might be the miraculously responsible opiate user you no doubt portray yourself to be. But that doesn't change the fact that the vast majority of users have no such will power; you are one person, not the majority, understand?
Actually, just the fact that you are on suboxone means that you couldn't handle it. So don't go lecturing people about how you have no problems with opiates and are a responsible user.
I did have problems with opiates, actually. I had a serious illness and was on codeine every six hours for several months; I took it exactly as prescribed. I was so addicted by the end that I brainwashed myself into believing that I was still in extreme physical pain and needed another dose. It was scary how the drug could do that. You do have serious problem with opiates, actually.
"Just bc you had a problem with opiates doesn't mean everybody should be denied them"...really? Are you still worth my time?
"You say opiates drive their own consumption more than GABAergics, that's entirely subjective" No I did not say that.
My mind is set in stone that no matter how many points for legalizing heroin you come up with, there is no way to know exactly what will happen if it is, and any free-thinking person would realize that there is a very great risk involved. That's my point.
Tapering off opiates is easier? Than what?
"I can't really think of someone that I know who would change their lifelong abstinence from opiates just bc it was legalized". Have you heard of advertising?
"most people know and understand the dependence liability of opiates before they start taking them". Source, now.
"Someone who wants to get off opiates above everything else can most often do so safely whereas GABAergics don't afford you that privilege". Maybe. But I know someone who was hospitalized from prescription morphine withdrawal taken as prescribed. He was about to die.
Just so you know, I am of the opinion that opiates/opioids should be available for use by the general population, but not necessarily legal as in go pick up a gram of diacetylmorphine at your nearest gas station.
^ding ding ding. Cigs and tobacco are legal and plenty of people don't smoke or drink. And are we sure this guy isn't trolling? I almost feel like he is.
Actually, you are the one "trolling". Just because you're shocked that I exposed the despicable nature of your post doesn't mean you should take out the fruits of your stupidity on me.
Heroin is not tobbacco. Heroin is not alcohol. Tobbacco simply cannot provide the all-around extreme comfort which mimics life-fulfillment that heroin readily provides, making people less likely to want to lead actual lives in favor of pursuit of heroin. And alcohol is very difficult to become addicted to if used in moderation, even if ingested virtually every day. Does that make sense? Do you see how this might be a problem?