There's no need for any condescending talk from anyone here. Whether said person is right or wrong, it's just not needed. So let's just agree to disagree. People can believe what they want, and they will also make up their mind as to which method is suitable for them.
End of...
he wouldnt listen to me,
he said, "we'll just agree to disagree,"
but this was a guy,
who believed he could fly,
and he fell from the top of a tree.
and died.
also,
the good Doctor is counter-productive and should be banned.
we should ask some of the guys in ADD about these theories:
* significant heat (and so solubility) increases as a result of crushing the tablets, causing significantly more harmful solutions in the same temp of solvent (oh excuse me- LLOLOLLOLOLKSUREMHMMOLOLOLOLOL)
* stirring a codeine phosphate solution causes the codeine to
"lose its salt", and become an insoluble freebase (so precipitate out )
(oh excuse me- HAHAHAAohwaitthatsnotevenfunny;areyoutakingthepiss?)
if I am wrong, and these two fascinatingly as-yet-unheard-of phenomenon are in fact theoretically demonstrable and (indeed) empirically verifiable logical implications of accepted scientific theory, then humble pie will of course be eaten.
If we are all right, and the good Doctor does indeed turn out to be a lying, deluded attention whore, I am sure we can expect to see some more ridiculous, counter-productive, pseudo-scientific manifestations of said whore's no-longer-pitiable desperation.
Hopefully to a degree, disruptive enough to warrant +b
good luck.