Surely you can't argue that wanting to know the real contents of supposed "legal" highs isn't harm reduction? I do agree though there are many other vendors that do this and don't cop anywhere near as much heat, but few others have products that have been so popular.
My point of view is that some of the criticism being levelled by users here is either bandwagon-jumping or individuals who throw moderation well and truly out the window and then turn around and blame the manufacturer when they end up in hospital. Not all mind you, but some yes.
I suppose it is harm reduction, but turning the results over to law enforcement and getting the products banned is prohibition. And one of the posters here insisting on naming the Australian resellers isn't good, all including NB have now stopped selling
The report I'm speaking of was done late last year by TicTac
I really dont care if people believe I have seen it or not.
Last edited: