Whilst on the topic of commonly used cuts and their respective solubility.. In the instance of a long term IV user of "base" methamphetamine, which is more harmful to the body over time, glucose/sucrose or epsom salts?
I have always wanted to inject a small amount (initially) of pseudoephedrine on it's own, to see if there is any distinguishable effects that some users may associate with the quality of their meth. If that makes sense?
Is there much information on the potential damage caused to the body by delivering glucose/sucrose, epsom salts, pseudoephedrine, etc. directly into the bloodstream by means of intravenous injection? Both long term and short term.
I am
hellbent on getting some decent harm reduction information out to the public about methamphetamine in Australia. Most of the users in the meth scene that I have talked to and shot up with have been greatly miseducated about what they're putting into their bodies.
..and nine times out of ten they're opposed to someone trying to re-educate them with the correct information.
P.S - I know I'm raving on and on about IV use of meth, however these questions can also be applied to other methods of administration. For example, which is a more damaging cut to the nasal passage in the case of snorted gear? Glucodin? Epsom salts?
Food for thought.
Ashley.