whoaaaa wait a minute here.......I never criticized a person, namely you, or a post, you are taking this way too personally, and responding with a direct criticism of me, complete with name calling. THAT is kindof shit of bluelight doesnt need more of. My response was based on fact, rooted in reality, and based on personal experience. Some background info....
*and, i dont believe this post goes into synthesis talk. It vaguely talks about the purification of unpure substances, which falls under harm reduction in every way. therefore, this post shouldnt be removed for synthesis talk, or because of taking it too personally*
First off, Yerg does have a point. And so do I..(and I didnt INTEND to come off as a "douchbag" on a "high horse"...once again, you are taking this WAY too personally)
If a batch of molly is 95% pure (which yes, is quite good by street standards) it would suggest that 5% more is needed for an active dose....that doesnt bump you up to 250 mg....that would suggest it is 50% pure....maybe I am confused. Are you suggesting it was 95% pure and then it was cut down the line? If so, then I recant...it just isnt clear in the posts.
Now back to my statement. I have been on bluelight since 2001, albeit under a different user name. I was arrested in 2004, for manufacture of MDMA and a few other things....i did my few years, and got out about 2 yrs ago. I am "reformed" now, but still take an interest in the goings on, hence my rejoining Bluelight. I am not arguing that brown or tan molly is weak, I never said that. It can be brown with as little as 2% impurities, those generally being unreacted MDP-2-P, possible dimers,depending on which synthesis was used, or MD alcohol, etc etc. Now, depending on crystal size, some of this can be removed with a simple anhydrous acetone wash. Now this step is easy, I dont know why so many chemists don't do it. But, if yr crystal size is bigger, you have to recrystallize. This step is also easy, but SO much product out there doesnt go thru this step, because it takes a few hours more than an acetone wash, and if your product is only 90% pure, this step removes that 10% of crap that isnt MDMA. And if you scale that up, that can be a substantial loss. Sooo, it comes down to greed, lazyness, or ineptitude. THAT is why I dont trust discolored crap. Because those are not characteristics I want from the person I am trusting to make the things I am to put into my body.
And it doesnt take a "top of the line lab with top of the line precursors" to produce MDMA that is 99% pure. Generally all it takes is a simple recrytallization or two or three. This is easy. And, in fact, the bulk of the MDMA produced is from anything but "top of the line precursors". Most comes from our fav essential oil, which is anything but top of the line precursor. And you mentioned sterile? Shit, most of the labs I've seen are anything but. Usually a quite dirty mad scientist mess. But still produce product that is 99% pure. We are not talking sterile culture work here. We are talking organic chemistry. I dont know how sterility plays into this?
So, I didnt intend to offend you. I am sorry if I did. I based my statements on fact. And personal experience. And I stand by them. I dont trust product that comes from people who are not willing to take a few more hours or incur a 5-10% loss in profit. These are not the kind of people I want controlling what I put into my body. Production should be a sacred act, not a time saving one or one based on profit. Can brown molly be as good as white molly? absolutely. I never said it couldnt. You seem to be willfully misinterpreting me. And taking it as an attack on you. It aint. And I resent the name calling and posts based in knee-jerk emotional response. This is the kind of thing bluelight struggles to avoid, and always has.
Peace.
