Correct me if necessary, but...
1st) use of an antipsychotic all by itself can be reasonably expected to imply that you're already acting under medical (profe$$ionally-endor$ed) advice, hence i've got to wonder why even raise the matter right here, not to mention it's about cocaine anyway?!!
2nd Besides this CANNABIS-dedicated forum being doomed IMHO only micro-dosing would make some fair sense and i'd think much more of LSD than cocaine - which is ONLY meant as a personal OPINION. E.G. this ain't in NO way any sort of medical advice or else, except i must consider you didn't exactly obtain antipsychotics in a conventional medical procedure...
3rd) My guide-line here would be to «
Follow the Shortest Path of Lesser Transformation », disqualifying antipsychotic and cocaine implicitely as both happen to be transformation produ¢t$, additionally involving potential VILIFICATION / VILAINIZATION at all these steps:
- Neuro-plasticity;
- Contaminants;
- Consumption Method & Ritual;
- Socio-toxic 3rd-party interference
Basically, it's an error to expect cannabis users to provide the type of advice requested in a thread gone silent 7 months ago. While i presume the original poster was only discussing antipsychotics applied to a CANNABIS context, i'm not even going to check having some perplex feeling trying to determine how genuine your justification actually is when posting such content in here, on Christmass exactly...
Or maybe it's nothing but the holyday$ $pirit that brought you around, so we can all reply what nacy Reagan use to reply: « Ju$t $ay NO! », euh... Been good bu$ine$$ for de¢ade$, lets try again: no, prohibition ain't proven wrong yet; it only takes a decade more or 2. Generations at most.
Next new year's eve: may we all enjoy a long life of pro$perity!!
Oh! Oh! Oh! Wish us all lot$ of money falling from the $ky in 2024!! Piles of ¢a$h, to $pend on $y$temi¢ abuse amplified with multi-toxi¢omany, or the new job around: influen¢er$, hired by the $¢ientology $e¢t i gue$$.
Happy new year!
