William Burroughs’s drugs cure inspires Alzheimer’s researcher

neversickanymore

Moderator: DS
Staff member
Joined
Jan 23, 2013
Messages
32,760
Location
babysitting the argument in my head
William Burroughs’s drugs cure inspires Alzheimer’s researcher

Author’s search in South America for the shamans’ plant hallucinogenic yagé and use of apomorphine to control his addiction leads neurologist to call for clinical trials

1379015374246.cached.jpg



Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s and motor neurone disease are the perennial neuro-degenerative afflictions which remind an ageing population that the human brain is still the final frontier of modern medicine.

Now, more than ever, the conundrum of the brain is a profound and fascinating mystery that is inspiring a new generation of graduate neuroscientists and attracting glossy funding for state-of-the-art research. But some of the advances in developing, for example, a cure for Parkinson’s are not hi-tech and have come via unlikely, even exotic, routes. Consider, for instance, the strange tale of Williams Burroughs, “the dead man’s vine” and the British medical establishment.

In 1953 the celebrated author of The Naked Lunch, a countercultural guru and lifelong junkie whose centenary is celebrated this year, travelled to South America on a quest for “the liana [vine] of the dead”, the plant source of ayahuasca, also known as yagé, a natural drug whose hallucinogenic properties, used by shamans, had long been known to European explorers. “All agree,” wrote one, “in the account of their sensations under its effects – alterations of cold and heat, fear and boldness, everything joyous and magnificent.”

Burroughs’s quest for “the final fix” was occasionally nerve-racking. After one infusion of yagé, he told his friend, the poet Allen Ginsberg: “I was completely delirious for four hours. The old bastard who prepared this potion specialises in poisoning gringos.”

The trip accelerated Burroughs’s acute drug dependence. In 1956, conscious that he might otherwise die, he went to London to be treated with apomorphine, a non-narcotic derivative of morphine, by Dr John Dent, a medical maverick and coincidentally the secretary of the British Society for the Study of Addiction.

Dent, who had begun his career in 1918 treating drunks around King’s Cross in London, had pioneered the use of apomorphine as a cure for alcoholism, reporting his findings in the British Journal of Inebriety in 1931. Acting on an inspired hunch, Dent applied his treatment to the drug-addicted Burroughs, who reported extraordinary results. “Apomorphine,” he wrote later, “acts on the back brain to normalise the bloodstream in such a way that the enzyme system of addiction is destroyed.”

continued here http://www.theguardian.com/science/...ghs-drugs-cure-inspires-alzheimers-researcher
 
Why is he using "apomorphine" and "yage" to control is opiate addiction? Doesn't apomorphine just make you sick, and wiki says it doesn't even bind to opioid receptors or "does not actually contain morphine or its skeleton, nor does it bind to opioid receptors. The apo- prefix relates to it being an aporphine derivative."
 
I think back when Burroughs was using apomorphine it was as a sort of aversion therapy. Whether that was from the strong emesis it produces or something else I am not entirely clear on.
 
What I find interesting about this article is that neither "cure" worked too well - Burroughs was addicted (off and on) his whole life, til his death in 1997 (at which point he was on methadone maintenance).
I think there are many more treatments to assist patients with opiate withdrawal these days than there were in William Burroughs' time....and surely if these 'cures' worked so well, they'd have become more widely practised? Maybe that's an unfair assumption to make?

Having said that, I think psychedelics such as ayahuasca are certainly worth further medical evaluation for use in treating addiction.
 
What I find interesting about this article is that neither "cure" worked too well - Burroughs was addicted (off and on) his whole life, til his death in 1997 (at which point he was on methadone maintenance).
I think there are many more treatments to assist patients with opiate withdrawal these days than there were in William Burroughs' time....and surely if these 'cures' worked so well, they'd have become more widely practised? Maybe that's an unfair assumption to make?

Having said that, I think psychedelics such as ayahuasca are certainly worth further medical evaluation for use in treating addiction.

He also used hash while in Morocco, grew cannabis when he lived in Kansas at the end of his life, and he did grow it when he was married and living in Texas. But cannabis is a psychedelic.
 
^ true - and while I agree that cannabis is psychedelic in its effects, William Burroughs was reported to have hated the effects of "hallucingenic" drugs (despite his well-documented pioneering use of LSD, DMT, psilocybin and yage/ayahuasca).

In all my readings of his yage pilgrimage in the 50s, it never seemed to really fulfill the role he desired of it (which - if I recall correctly - was to do with experiencing some kind of "ultimate trip" that would help free him from addiction.
It is interesting that - of all things - there is an effort to revisit or research along this part of Burroughs' exceptional life story, considering it didnt seem to 'cure' him at all.

Not to be too critical - I am, after all, a big fan of WSB...but it seems a little odd.

Why is so little attention given to the considerable addiction-breaking properties of ibogaine, for instance?
I don't know much about apomorphine, but surely if it worked that well in clinical practice it would still have it's advocates today?
Maybe that is a mistaken assumption, considering how big Pharma and the 'rehab industry' work in many parts of the world.
 
I just came across this for the first time while researching aversion therapy, and I have got to say it has peaked my interest.

There seems to be a lack of in-depth material.
 
Burroughs has always irked me.

His writting is mad concise but who shoots their wife in the head..?
 
It was a reckless accident, and one that (he claimed) lead him to become a writer; one of the most influential of the 20th century.

Nobody could justify him killing his wife by fooling around with a gun, but I don't understand why an artists' life story has to be included in how we percieve their work.
Some of the best artists, thinkers and creative people have had personal lives that put them at odds with socially acceptable public opinion. It needn't take away from their art, unless you chose to let it taint your opinion.
 
Top