badrobot114
Bluelighter
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2013
- Messages
- 266
Hi all, this is going to be a bit of a rant so be advised 
I've been diagnosed with ADHD(combined type) about 2 years ago(although it was quite obvious I have for as long as I can remember) and i've been cycling through various forms of racemic methylphenidate(the only registered med in my country for the condition). It's possible to get a prescription for amphetamines and dexmethylphenidate here but it has to be imported which makes it too expensive for the big majority of people.
Now, I have experimented with low doses of high quality d-methamp to treat my ADHD a few times in the past, and have also tried Desoxyn(oral dosing only, 10mg doses taken once or twice as needed throughout the day with both Desoxyn and d-methamp) on occasion with much better results than methylphenidate and no side effects whatsoever(the peripheral enantiomer of racemic formulations is very rough for me and makes me feel very uncomfortable and twitchy).
I tried switching my script to Dexedrine after my trials with d-amph after my positive reaction to d-methamp but was denied because "it has high abuse potential". Following that I considered asking for dexmethylphenidate but as mentioned earlier, it's too expensive where I live because it needs to be imported and isn't covered at all by insurance plans and am basically stuck with a med that doesn't completely agree with me because of financial motives and stupid prejudice.
This all ties to my original question because I see this happening in regards to Desoxyn as well. Clearly using very low oral doses of clean and reliable Meth is a far cry from binging on ridiculous doses of dirty street drugs. It annoys me to see people states side denied a very viable treatment option due to the same reasons I am: anachronistic stigma, war on drugs mentality and financial motives at the expense of people's well being.
What's your opinion on this? do you think Desoxyn should be included in the same category as other amphetamine medications? or do you agree it's too dangerous and should be kept as an absolute last resort like it is now?

I've been diagnosed with ADHD(combined type) about 2 years ago(although it was quite obvious I have for as long as I can remember) and i've been cycling through various forms of racemic methylphenidate(the only registered med in my country for the condition). It's possible to get a prescription for amphetamines and dexmethylphenidate here but it has to be imported which makes it too expensive for the big majority of people.
Now, I have experimented with low doses of high quality d-methamp to treat my ADHD a few times in the past, and have also tried Desoxyn(oral dosing only, 10mg doses taken once or twice as needed throughout the day with both Desoxyn and d-methamp) on occasion with much better results than methylphenidate and no side effects whatsoever(the peripheral enantiomer of racemic formulations is very rough for me and makes me feel very uncomfortable and twitchy).
I tried switching my script to Dexedrine after my trials with d-amph after my positive reaction to d-methamp but was denied because "it has high abuse potential". Following that I considered asking for dexmethylphenidate but as mentioned earlier, it's too expensive where I live because it needs to be imported and isn't covered at all by insurance plans and am basically stuck with a med that doesn't completely agree with me because of financial motives and stupid prejudice.
This all ties to my original question because I see this happening in regards to Desoxyn as well. Clearly using very low oral doses of clean and reliable Meth is a far cry from binging on ridiculous doses of dirty street drugs. It annoys me to see people states side denied a very viable treatment option due to the same reasons I am: anachronistic stigma, war on drugs mentality and financial motives at the expense of people's well being.
What's your opinion on this? do you think Desoxyn should be included in the same category as other amphetamine medications? or do you agree it's too dangerous and should be kept as an absolute last resort like it is now?