• MDMA &
    Empathogenic
    Drugs

    Welcome Guest!

Why is LSD not a common adulterant of pills?

ntype

Bluelighter
Joined
Jan 17, 2006
Messages
1,228
It would seem like a cheap substitute for MDMA! Why do you NEVER get pills 'cut' with acid?
 
it's not really ethical to do that..
lsd is much harder to synthesise than mdma so many mdma labs don't have lsd, would also form some problems to have 50 mics (or around that) to be pressed in toghether with mdma.
 
I'm not sure if todays pills are heat pressed, but heat destroys LSD. Also pills aren't stored as well as LSD, LSD degrades easily with age or improper storage. And LSD synth is a lot harder.
 
Some how I don't think ethics would have anything to do with cut pills. I mean it's not really ethical to have meth, DXM, PMA, ect cut pills either but you see those.
 
LSD is a lot harder to synthesize than MDMA and since other adulterants (meth, caffeine, procaine, DXM, etc) are much cheaper, it would be more economical for them to use those instead of LSD.

i do no promote the adulteration of ecstasy. MDMA is the ONLY substance that should be present in ecstasy pills but a candyflip in a pill would be nice :D
 
i think that they dont because aside from being hard to synthesis lsd is effective in such small amounts that it wouldnt add any weight and therefor would be useless if trying to add crap to a batch to make it bigger so you can rpess more pills

actually acid in beans would be more like a free gift then anything else
haha
 
The only time I could see acid being in pills is if somebody had liquid measured acid and dropped some on some pills before they went somewhere.

To actually put LSD into the pills would be moronic because it would degrade very quickly due to the heat. They would be bunk by the time they reached your mouth.
 
I don't think it would be a cheap subsitute for MDMA. It has very different effects so therefore it is not a substitute. And I don't see how it's cheaper either.
 
If they put LSD in pills it would most likely be from the crystal product, not the diluted liquid.
 
It isn't cost effective either. The purpose of adulterating pills is to make more money by adding cheap cuts.
 
The price of acid is irrelevant(and it isn't that cheap here), the point is you can make more money by adding meth, caffeine, etc to the pills. I mean, a ready to go candyflip would be nice, but I think it's something you would be better off preparing yourself.
 
The Hoff Bomb said:
^LSd is only like 3-5$ a hit though.

My former dealers (I don't roll anymore) were not paying more than 3 to 5 dollars per pill in the first place...

Also it wouldn't be too great to get a pill with LSD on it. If you didn't know it had LSD you could easily not be ready for it, and what if you doubled or tripped your first dose? That would be quite a lot of LSD, especially for a person who has no idea they consumed the drug in the first place.
 
lsd is far rarer, and more powerful. Usually those that have lsd tend not to go around selling it as something else as well.



---------------

http://transiency.org ---- a drugs and spirituality wiki
 
Top